• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

质体定位的磷脂酶 Dα4 和α5 调控水稻中食草动物诱导的直接和间接防御。

The chloroplast-localized phospholipases D α4 and α5 regulate herbivore-induced direct and indirect defenses in rice.

机构信息

National Key Laboratory of Rice Biology, Institute of Insect Science, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310029, China.

出版信息

Plant Physiol. 2011 Dec;157(4):1987-99. doi: 10.1104/pp.111.183749. Epub 2011 Oct 7.

DOI:10.1104/pp.111.183749
PMID:21984727
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3327179/
Abstract

The oxylipin pathway is of central importance for plant defensive responses. Yet, the first step of the pathway, the liberation of linolenic acid following induction, is poorly understood. Phospholipases D (PLDs) have been hypothesized to mediate this process, but data from Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) regarding the role of PLDs in plant resistance have remained controversial. Here, we cloned two chloroplast-localized PLD genes from rice (Oryza sativa), OsPLDα4 and OsPLDα5, both of which were up-regulated in response to feeding by the rice striped stem borer (SSB) Chilo suppressalis, mechanical wounding, and treatment with jasmonic acid (JA). Antisense expression of OsPLDα4 and -α5 (as-pld), which resulted in a 50% reduction of the expression of the two genes, reduced elicited levels of linolenic acid, JA, green leaf volatiles, and ethylene and attenuated the SSB-induced expression of a mitogen-activated protein kinase (OsMPK3), a lipoxygenase (OsHI-LOX), a hydroperoxide lyase (OsHPL3), as well as a 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid synthase (OsACS2). The impaired oxylipin and ethylene signaling in as-pld plants decreased the levels of herbivore-induced trypsin protease inhibitors and volatiles, improved the performance of SSB and the rice brown planthopper Nilaparvata lugens, and reduced the attractiveness of plants to a larval parasitoid of SSB, Apanteles chilonis. The production of trypsin protease inhibitors in as-pld plants could be partially restored by JA, while the resistance to rice brown planthopper and SSB was restored by green leaf volatile application. Our results show that phospholipases function as important components of herbivore-induced direct and indirect defenses in rice.

摘要

类二十烷酸途径对于植物防御反应至关重要。然而,该途径的第一步,即在诱导后释放亚麻酸,还了解甚少。已经假设磷脂酶 D (PLD) 介导这一过程,但来自拟南芥 (Arabidopsis thaliana) 的关于 PLD 在植物抗性中的作用的数据仍然存在争议。在这里,我们从水稻 (Oryza sativa) 中克隆了两个质体定位的 PLD 基因,OsPLDα4 和 OsPLDα5,它们都对水稻二化螟 (Chilo suppressalis) 的取食、机械损伤和茉莉酸 (JA) 处理有反应。OsPLDα4 和 -α5 的反义表达 (as-pld) 导致这两个基因的表达减少 50%,降低了亚麻酸、JA、绿叶挥发物和乙烯的诱导水平,并减弱了 SSB 诱导的丝裂原活化蛋白激酶 (OsMPK3)、脂氧合酶 (OsHI-LOX) 、过氧化物裂解酶 (OsHPL3) 和 1-氨基环丙烷-1-羧酸合酶 (OsACS2) 的表达。as-pld 植株中类二十烷酸和乙烯信号的受损降低了草食性诱导的胰蛋白酶抑制剂和挥发物的水平,改善了 SSB 和褐飞虱 Nilaparvata lugens 的表现,并降低了 SSB 幼虫寄生蜂 Apanteles chilonis 对植物的吸引力。JA 可以部分恢复 as-pld 植株中胰蛋白酶抑制剂的产生,而绿叶挥发物的应用则恢复了对褐飞虱和 SSB 的抗性。我们的结果表明,磷脂酶作为水稻中草食性诱导的直接和间接防御的重要组成部分发挥作用。

相似文献

1
The chloroplast-localized phospholipases D α4 and α5 regulate herbivore-induced direct and indirect defenses in rice.质体定位的磷脂酶 Dα4 和α5 调控水稻中食草动物诱导的直接和间接防御。
Plant Physiol. 2011 Dec;157(4):1987-99. doi: 10.1104/pp.111.183749. Epub 2011 Oct 7.
2
OsNPR1 negatively regulates herbivore-induced JA and ethylene signaling and plant resistance to a chewing herbivore in rice.OsNPR1 负调控昆虫诱导的茉莉酸和乙烯信号以及水稻对咀嚼式昆虫的抗性。
Physiol Plant. 2013 Mar;147(3):340-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3054.2012.01666.x. Epub 2012 Jul 12.
3
OsMPK3 positively regulates the JA signaling pathway and plant resistance to a chewing herbivore in rice.OsMPK3 正向调控茉莉酸信号通路和水稻对咀嚼式食草动物的抗性。
Plant Cell Rep. 2013 Jul;32(7):1075-84. doi: 10.1007/s00299-013-1389-2. Epub 2013 Jan 24.
4
The 9-lipoxygenase Osr9-LOX1 interacts with the 13-lipoxygenase-mediated pathway to regulate resistance to chewing and piercing-sucking herbivores in rice.9-脂氧合酶Osr9-LOX1与13-脂氧合酶介导的途径相互作用,以调节水稻对咀嚼式和刺吸式食草动物的抗性。
Physiol Plant. 2014 Sep;152(1):59-69. doi: 10.1111/ppl.12148. Epub 2014 Feb 10.
5
Contrasting effects of ethylene biosynthesis on induced plant resistance against a chewing and a piercing-sucking herbivore in rice.乙烯生物合成对诱导水稻抗咀嚼和刺吸式食草动物的植物抗性的对比影响。
Mol Plant. 2014 Nov;7(11):1670-1682. doi: 10.1093/mp/ssu085. Epub 2014 Jul 26.
6
Silencing OsHI-LOX makes rice more susceptible to chewing herbivores, but enhances resistance to a phloem feeder.沉默 OsHI-LOX 使水稻更容易受到咀嚼食草动物的侵害,但增强了对韧皮部饲养者的抵抗力。
Plant J. 2009 Nov;60(4):638-48. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2009.03988.x. Epub 2009 Jul 25.
7
OsLRR-RLK1, an early responsive leucine-rich repeat receptor-like kinase, initiates rice defense responses against a chewing herbivore.OsLRR-RLK1,一种早期应答的富含亮氨酸重复受体样激酶,启动了水稻对咀嚼式食草动物的防御反应。
New Phytol. 2018 Aug;219(3):1097-1111. doi: 10.1111/nph.15247. Epub 2018 Jun 7.
8
Expressing Impairs Plant Growth but Enhances the Resistance of Rice to the Striped Stem Borer .表达抑制植物生长,但增强水稻对二化螟的抗性。
Int J Mol Sci. 2018 Apr 13;19(4):1182. doi: 10.3390/ijms19041182.
9
An EAR-motif-containing ERF transcription factor affects herbivore-induced signaling, defense and resistance in rice.一个含有 EAR 基序的 ERF 转录因子影响水稻中取食诱导的信号转导、防御和抗性。
Plant J. 2011 Nov;68(4):583-96. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2011.04709.x. Epub 2011 Aug 30.
10
The Rice Transcription Factor WRKY53 Suppresses Herbivore-Induced Defenses by Acting as a Negative Feedback Modulator of Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Activity.水稻转录因子WRKY53通过作为丝裂原活化蛋白激酶活性的负反馈调节剂来抑制食草动物诱导的防御反应。
Plant Physiol. 2015 Dec;169(4):2907-21. doi: 10.1104/pp.15.01090. Epub 2015 Oct 9.

引用本文的文献

1
OsEDS1 and OsPAD4 Are Involved in Brown Planthopper Resistance in Rice.水稻中的OsEDS1和OsPAD4参与抗褐飞虱反应。
Plants (Basel). 2025 May 25;14(11):1612. doi: 10.3390/plants14111612.
2
Roles of hormones, calcium and in the defense of Lamb. against Walker.激素、钙以及[此处原文缺失内容]在保护羔羊抵御[此处原文缺失内容]·沃克方面的作用。
For Res (Fayettev). 2021 Dec 3;1:21. doi: 10.48130/FR-2021-0021. eCollection 2021.
3
Genome-wide association study reveals effect of nsSNPs on candidate genes in rice during iron deficiency.全基因组关联研究揭示了缺铁条件下水稻中 nsSNP 对候选基因的影响。
Funct Integr Genomics. 2024 Oct 25;24(6):198. doi: 10.1007/s10142-024-01478-w.
4
A time-course transcriptomic analysis reveals the key responses of a resistant rice cultivar to brown planthopper infestation.一个时间过程转录组学分析揭示了一个抗褐飞虱水稻品种对褐飞虱侵害的关键反应。
Sci Rep. 2024 Sep 28;14(1):22455. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-73546-x.
5
-Mediated GLVs Enhance Rice Resistance to Brown Planthoppers.介导的绿叶挥发物增强水稻对褐飞虱的抗性。
Plants (Basel). 2024 May 29;13(11):1494. doi: 10.3390/plants13111494.
6
Magnaporthe oryzae infection triggers rice resistance to brown planthopper through the influence of jasmonic acid on the flavonoid biosynthesis pathway.稻瘟病菌感染通过茉莉酸对类黄酮生物合成途径的影响引发水稻对褐飞虱的抗性。
Insect Sci. 2025 Feb;32(1):243-259. doi: 10.1111/1744-7917.13378. Epub 2024 May 15.
7
Volatolomics to Decrypt the Monophagous Nature of a Rice Pest, Scirpophaga Incertulas (Walker).挥发组学解析单食性害虫褐飞虱的取食特性。
J Chem Ecol. 2024 Aug;50(7-8):373-384. doi: 10.1007/s10886-024-01498-7. Epub 2024 Apr 19.
8
Silencing an ATP-Dependent Caseinolytic Protease Proteolytic Subunit Gene Enhances the Resistance of Rice to .沉默一个 ATP 依赖的蛋白酶体蛋白酶亚基基因可增强水稻对 … 的抗性。
Int J Mol Sci. 2024 Mar 26;25(7):3699. doi: 10.3390/ijms25073699.
9
Single-Cell RNA sequencing of leaf sheath cells reveals the mechanism of rice resistance to brown planthopper ().叶鞘细胞的单细胞RNA测序揭示了水稻对褐飞虱的抗性机制。
Front Plant Sci. 2023 Jun 19;14:1200014. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1200014. eCollection 2023.
10
The dissection of tomato flavor: biochemistry, genetics, and omics.番茄风味剖析:生物化学、遗传学与组学
Front Plant Sci. 2023 Jun 6;14:1144113. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1144113. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
An EAR-motif-containing ERF transcription factor affects herbivore-induced signaling, defense and resistance in rice.一个含有 EAR 基序的 ERF 转录因子影响水稻中取食诱导的信号转导、防御和抗性。
Plant J. 2011 Nov;68(4):583-96. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2011.04709.x. Epub 2011 Aug 30.
2
Phospholipase D and phosphatidic acid signalling in plant response to drought and salinity.磷脂酶 D 和磷脂酸信号在植物响应干旱和盐胁迫中的作用。
Plant Cell Environ. 2010 Apr;33(4):627-35. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2009.02087.x. Epub 2009 Nov 24.
3
Phospholipase dalpha1 and phosphatidic acid regulate NADPH oxidase activity and production of reactive oxygen species in ABA-mediated stomatal closure in Arabidopsis.磷脂酶Dα1和磷脂酸在拟南芥脱落酸介导的气孔关闭过程中调节NADPH氧化酶活性和活性氧的产生。
Plant Cell. 2009 Aug;21(8):2357-77. doi: 10.1105/tpc.108.062992. Epub 2009 Aug 18.
4
Silencing OsHI-LOX makes rice more susceptible to chewing herbivores, but enhances resistance to a phloem feeder.沉默 OsHI-LOX 使水稻更容易受到咀嚼食草动物的侵害,但增强了对韧皮部饲养者的抵抗力。
Plant J. 2009 Nov;60(4):638-48. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2009.03988.x. Epub 2009 Jul 25.
5
Phospholipase D activation is an early component of the salicylic acid signaling pathway in Arabidopsis cell suspensions.磷脂酶D的激活是拟南芥细胞悬浮液中水杨酸信号通路的早期组成部分。
Plant Physiol. 2009 May;150(1):424-36. doi: 10.1104/pp.108.133595. Epub 2009 Mar 20.
6
Phospholipase D- and phosphatidic acid-mediated signaling in plants.植物中磷脂酶D和磷脂酸介导的信号传导
Biochim Biophys Acta. 2009 Sep;1791(9):927-35. doi: 10.1016/j.bbalip.2009.02.017. Epub 2009 Mar 13.
7
Suppression of a phospholipase D gene, OsPLDbeta1, activates defense responses and increases disease resistance in rice.磷脂酶D基因OsPLDbeta1的抑制激活了水稻的防御反应并增强了其抗病性。
Plant Physiol. 2009 May;150(1):308-19. doi: 10.1104/pp.108.131979. Epub 2009 Mar 13.
8
Reassessing the role of phospholipase D in the Arabidopsis wounding response.重新评估磷脂酶D在拟南芥创伤反应中的作用。
Plant Cell Environ. 2009 Jul;32(7):837-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2009.01962.x. Epub 2009 Feb 9.
9
Phospholipase D epsilon and phosphatidic acid enhance Arabidopsis nitrogen signaling and growth.磷脂酶Dε和磷脂酸增强拟南芥的氮信号传导及生长。
Plant J. 2009 May;58(3):376-87. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2009.03788.x. Epub 2009 Jan 8.
10
Involvement of phospholipase D in the low temperature acclimation-induced thermotolerance in grape berry.磷脂酶D参与葡萄果实低温驯化诱导的耐热性过程。
Plant Physiol Biochem. 2009 Jun;47(6):504-10. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2008.12.010. Epub 2008 Dec 24.