Suppr超能文献

与地标引导下的颈内静脉穿刺尝试后颈动脉穿刺相关的风险因素。

Risk factors associated with carotid artery puncture following landmark-guided internal jugular vein cannulation attempts.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, School of Medicine, University of Nis, Nis, Serbia.

出版信息

Med Princ Pract. 2011;20(6):562-6. doi: 10.1159/000329788. Epub 2011 Oct 4.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The relationship between certain risk factors and carotid artery puncture (CAP) as an early mechanical complication following internal jugular vein cannulation attempts (IJVCAs) was evaluated.

METHODS

In a retrospective 1-year observational single-center study, 86 IJVCAs conducted in the operating room by 4 competent anesthesiologists were evaluated. Age, gender, puncture side, number of cannulation attempts, circumstances of the procedure and incidence of CAP were obtained from medical records.

RESULTS

Of the 86 IJVCAs performed in patients aged 18-75 years, CAP occurred in 8 (9.3%): 5 (5.8%) in patients >65 years and 3 (3.5%) in patients <65 years of age. CAP was not associated with patient's age (p = 0.11) and gender (p = 0.76). Multiple cannulation attempts (OR = 26.25; 95% CI = 4.52-152.51; p < 0.001) and placement of CVC under emergency conditions (OR = 14.84; 95% CI = 1.73-127.22; p = 0.014) increased the risk for CAP significantly. Also, the risk for CAP was higher when IJVCAs were performed before induction of general anesthesia (OR = 15.75; 95% CI = 1.83-135.1; p = 0.019). CAP was more likely to happen during left-sided than right-sided IJVCA (OR = 5.98; 95% CI = 1.29-27.59; p = 0.022). In addition, left-sided attempts considerably increased the risk for multiple cannulation attempts (OR = 2.782; 95% CI = 1.342-3.965; p < 0.01). Also, manifold cannulation attempts were more frequent if the IJVCA was performed before induction of anesthesia (OR = 4.219; CI = 1.579-11.271; p = 0.004).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results strongly suggest that left-sided, multiple IJVCAs, performed under emergency conditions in conscious patients in the operating room, represent considerable risks for possible CAP.

摘要

目的

评估某些危险因素与颈总动脉穿刺(CAP)之间的关系,CAP 是颈内静脉穿刺尝试(IJVCAs)后早期机械并发症之一。

方法

在一项回顾性的 1 年单中心观察研究中,评估了 4 位有经验的麻醉师在手术室进行的 86 次 IJVCAs。从病历中获取患者年龄、性别、穿刺侧、穿刺尝试次数、操作情况和 CAP 发生率。

结果

在 18-75 岁的患者中,86 例 IJVCAs 中有 8 例发生 CAP(9.3%):65 岁以上患者 5 例(5.8%),65 岁以下患者 3 例(3.5%)。CAP 与患者年龄(p = 0.11)和性别(p = 0.76)无关。多次穿刺(OR = 26.25;95%CI = 4.52-152.51;p < 0.001)和紧急情况下放置 CVC(OR = 14.84;95%CI = 1.73-127.22;p = 0.014)显著增加 CAP 的风险。此外,在全身麻醉诱导前进行 IJVCAs 时,CAP 的风险更高(OR = 15.75;95%CI = 1.83-135.1;p = 0.019)。与右侧相比,左侧颈内静脉穿刺(IJVCAs)更易发生 CAP(OR = 5.98;95%CI = 1.29-27.59;p = 0.022)。此外,左侧尝试明显增加了多次穿刺的风险(OR = 2.782;95%CI = 1.342-3.965;p < 0.01)。此外,如果 IJVCAs 在麻醉诱导前进行,多次穿刺更为频繁(OR = 4.219;CI = 1.579-11.271;p = 0.004)。

结论

我们的结果强烈表明,在手术室中对清醒患者进行左侧、多次、紧急情况下的颈内静脉穿刺,是 CAP 的重要危险因素。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验