Nardi P, Biagi P, Poggini M, Bocchini S
Divisione di Radiologia, Presidio Ospedaliero, USL 31, Montepulciano (SI).
Radiol Med. 1990 Apr;79(4):349-53.
US patterns of abdominal lymph nodes were investigated in patients with neoplastic and non-neoplastic diseases, and in randomly-chosen subjects with no evidence of any pathologic condition. Major longitudinal diameter (DMax) was statistically evaluated, together with minor transverse diameter (DMin), roundness index (RI), and structural index (IS)-i.e., the presence of a central hyperechoic line (as the US sign of normal lymph node architecture). DMax proved to be useless for distinguishing between groups. The presence of a central hyperechoic line was the most useful parameter, although the extant 3 (DMin, RI, IS) were also useful for distinguishing between groups. By correlating each numerical parameter with the hyperechoic line sign an even better discrimination was obtained. Thus, it can be assumed that only a combined and comprehensive evaluation of the above parameters makes the best criterion to differentiate between neoplastic and non-neoplastic abdominal lymph nodes.
我们对患有肿瘤性和非肿瘤性疾病的患者以及随机选择的无任何病理状况证据的受试者的腹部淋巴结模式进行了研究。对主要纵向直径(DMax)以及次要横向直径(DMin)、圆形度指数(RI)和结构指数(IS)进行了统计学评估,即中央高回声线的存在情况(作为正常淋巴结结构的超声征象)。结果证明,DMax对于区分不同组并无用处。中央高回声线的存在是最有用的参数,不过现有的另外三个参数(DMin、RI、IS)对于区分不同组也有用。通过将每个数值参数与高回声线征象相关联,能获得更好的区分效果。因此,可以假定只有对上述参数进行综合全面的评估,才是区分肿瘤性和非肿瘤性腹部淋巴结的最佳标准。