Suppr超能文献

尺度依赖的邻域效应:共同的厄运与关联庇护。

Scale-dependent neighborhood effects: shared doom and associational refuge.

机构信息

Biology Department, Lawrence University, Appleton, WI 54911, USA.

出版信息

Oecologia. 2012 Mar;168(3):659-70. doi: 10.1007/s00442-011-2144-4. Epub 2011 Oct 7.

Abstract

A resource's susceptibility to predation may be influenced by its own palatability and the palatability of its neighbors. We tested for effects of plant chemical defenses on seed survival by manipulating the frequency of palatable and less palatable sunflower seeds in food patches subject to harvest by fox squirrels (Sciurus niger) and gray squirrels (Sciurus carolinensis). We varied resource distributions at three scales: among stations (aggregates of patches ca. 50 m apart), among patches immediately adjacent to each other, and within patches. When food patches were segregated into high-palatability and low-palatability stations (Experiment 1), seeds suffered greater mortality at stations with high levels of palatable seeds. In the same experiment, within patches, squirrels selected strongly for palatable seeds over less palatable seeds. When high- and low-palatability food patches were placed together at the same stations (Experiment 2), increasing densities of co-occurring palatable seeds amplified the mortality of less palatable seeds, indicating "shared doom." When palatable and less palatable seeds were partitioned into micropatches (Experiment 3), associational effects disappeared, as predicted. Furthermore, selectivity in less palatable patches increased as the initial densities of palatable seeds increased, and selectivity in palatable patches decreased as the initial densities of less palatable seeds increased. Foraging theory predicts associational effects among prey that vary in palatability. Our results show how the type and magnitude of associational effects emerge from the interplay among the spatial scale of prey heterogeneity, the diet selection strategy, and the scale-dependent foraging responses of the consumer.

摘要

资源易遭受捕食的可能性可能会受到其自身的可食用性以及其邻居的可食用性的影响。我们通过操纵在狐狸松鼠(Sciurus niger)和灰松鼠(Sciurus carolinensis)的收获范围内食物斑块中可食用和不太可食用的向日葵种子的频率,来测试植物化学防御对种子存活的影响。我们在三个尺度上改变了资源分布:站之间(相距约 50 米的斑块聚集)、彼此相邻的斑块之间以及斑块内。当食物斑块被分隔成高可食用性和低可食用性站(实验 1)时,种子在高可食用性种子水平较高的站中死亡率更高。在同一实验中,在斑块内,松鼠强烈选择可食用的种子而不是不太可食用的种子。当高可食用性和低可食用性食物斑块被放置在同一站(实验 2)时,共同出现的可食用性种子密度增加会放大不太可食用性种子的死亡率,表明“共同厄运”。当可食用性和不太可食用性种子被分成微斑块(实验 3)时,如预测的那样,关联效应消失了。此外,随着可食用性种子初始密度的增加,不太可食用性斑块中的选择性增加,而随着不太可食用性种子初始密度的增加,可食用性斑块中的选择性降低。觅食理论预测了在可食用性方面存在差异的猎物之间的关联效应。我们的结果表明,关联效应的类型和大小如何从猎物异质性的空间尺度、饮食选择策略以及消费者的依赖于尺度的觅食反应之间的相互作用中出现。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验