Suppr超能文献

神经遥测电极应用技术比较。

Neurotelemetry electrode application techniques compared.

作者信息

Lau Ryan R, Powell Mary K, Terry Colin, Jahnke Derek

机构信息

Indiana University Health, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.

出版信息

Am J Electroneurodiagnostic Technol. 2011 Sep;51(3):165-82.

Abstract

The secure and efficient affixation of EEG electrodes is an integral part of performing neurotelemetry; however there are currently no recommendations for the ideal method of affixing the electrodes that has evidence-based support. The purpose of this study was to find and determine the best hook up method based on the required hook up time and number of repairs. One hundred neurotelemetry patients were randomly assigned to one of the following four electrode application methods: collodion-Ten20, collodion-Elefix, Hypafix-Ten20, or Hypafix-Elefix. The collodion-Ten20 method had the longest average hook up time (53.7 min) and the lowest percentage of patients who needed repairs (24%); the Hypafix-Ten20 method had the shortest average hook up time (42.1 min); and the Hypafix-Elefix had the highest percentage of patients who needed repairs (86.4%). Based on these results, the study led to the recommendations that collodion-Ten20 be used for neurotelemetry studies lasting 24 hours or more and that Hypafix is more suitable for routine EEG studies.

摘要

脑电图电极的安全有效固定是进行神经遥测的一个重要组成部分;然而,目前尚无基于循证支持的关于电极理想固定方法的建议。本研究的目的是根据所需的连接时间和修复次数来找到并确定最佳的连接方法。100名神经遥测患者被随机分配到以下四种电极应用方法中的一种:火棉胶 - 泰诺20、火棉胶 - 伊莱菲克斯、优帕菲克斯 - 泰诺20或优帕菲克斯 - 伊莱菲克斯。火棉胶 - 泰诺20方法的平均连接时间最长(53.7分钟),需要修复的患者比例最低(24%);优帕菲克斯 - 泰诺20方法的平均连接时间最短(42.1分钟);而优帕菲克斯 - 伊莱菲克斯方法中需要修复的患者比例最高(86.4%)。基于这些结果,该研究得出以下建议:火棉胶 - 泰诺20用于持续24小时或更长时间的神经遥测研究,而优帕菲克斯更适合常规脑电图研究。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验