Department of Surgical Sciences, Colorectal Surgery, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
BMC Cancer. 2011 Oct 11;11:438. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-11-438.
In cancer research the selection and definitions of survival endpoints are important and yet they are not used consistently. The aim of this study was to compare different survival endpoints in patients with primary colorectal cancer (CRC) and to understand the effect of second primary other cancer on disease-free survival (DFS) calculations.
A population-based cohort of 415 patients with CRC, 332 of whom were treated with curative intention between the years 2000-2003, was analysed. Events such as locoregional recurrence, distant metastases, second primary cancers, death, cause of death and loss to follow-up were recorded. Different survival endpoints, including DFS, overall survival, cancer-specific survival, relapse-free survival, time to treatment failure and time to recurrence were compared and DFS was calculated with and without inclusion of second primary other cancers.
The events that occurred most often in patients treated with curative intention were non-cancer-related death (n = 74), distant metastases (n = 66) and death from CRC (n = 59). DFS was the survival endpoint with most events (n = 170) followed by overall survival (n = 144) and relapse-free survival (n = 139). Fewer events were seen for time to treatment failure (n = 80), time to recurrence (n = 68) and cancer-specific survival (n = 59). Second primary other cancer occurred in 26 patients and its inclusion as an event in DFS calculations had a detrimental effect on the survival. The DFS for patients with stage I-III disease was 62% after 5 years if second primary other cancer was not included as an event, compared with 58% if it was. However, the difference was larger for stage II (68 vs 60%) than for stage III (49 vs 47%).
The inclusion of second primary other cancer as an endpoint in DFS analyses significantly alters the DFS for patients with CRC. Researchers and journals must clearly define survival endpoints in all trial protocols and published manuscripts.
在癌症研究中,生存终点的选择和定义很重要,但目前它们的使用并不一致。本研究的目的是比较原发性结直肠癌(CRC)患者的不同生存终点,并了解第二原发其他癌症对无病生存期(DFS)计算的影响。
分析了 415 例 CRC 患者的基于人群的队列,其中 332 例患者在 2000-2003 年期间接受了治愈性治疗。记录了局部复发、远处转移、第二原发癌症、死亡、死因和随访丢失等事件。比较了不同的生存终点,包括 DFS、总生存期、癌症特异性生存期、无复发生存期、治疗失败时间和复发时间,并计算了包括和不包括第二原发其他癌症的 DFS。
接受治愈性治疗的患者最常发生的事件是非癌症相关死亡(n=74)、远处转移(n=66)和 CRC 死亡(n=59)。DFS 是事件发生最多的生存终点(n=170),其次是总生存期(n=144)和无复发生存期(n=139)。治疗失败时间(n=80)、复发时间(n=68)和癌症特异性生存期(n=59)的事件较少。26 例患者发生第二原发其他癌症,将其作为 DFS 计算中的事件会对生存产生不利影响。如果不将第二原发其他癌症作为事件,I-III 期疾病患者的 5 年 DFS 为 62%,如果将其作为事件,5 年 DFS 为 58%。然而,对于 II 期(68%比 60%)的差异大于 III 期(49%比 47%)。
将第二原发其他癌症作为 DFS 分析中的终点会显著改变 CRC 患者的 DFS。研究人员和期刊必须在所有试验方案和已发表的手稿中明确界定生存终点。