• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

保乳手术后局部复发:多变量分析危险因素和年轻年龄的影响。

Local recurrence after breast-conserving surgery: multivariable analysis of risk factors and the impact of young age.

机构信息

Mayo Medical School, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.

出版信息

Ann Surg Oncol. 2012 Apr;19(4):1153-9. doi: 10.1245/s10434-011-2084-6. Epub 2011 Oct 12.

DOI:10.1245/s10434-011-2084-6
PMID:21989658
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Local recurrence (LR) after breast conservation surgery (BCS) varies with risk factors. This study was designed to evaluate the impact of young age on LR.

METHODS

All patients (excluding those who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy) who underwent BCS from 1988-2001 at our institution were identified and evaluated for risk factors of LR.

RESULTS

A total of 3,064 patients underwent 3,131 BCS. Mean age at surgery was 61 (range, 21-98) years: 175 (5.6%) patients were aged<40 years; 492 (15.7%) were 40-49 years; 761 (24.3%) were 50-59 years; 801 (25.6%) were 60-69 years; and 902 (28.8%) were age 70+years. A total of 212 patients (6.8%) developed LR at a mean of 4.5 (range, 0.1-14.4) years after BCS. Mean follow-up was 8.9 (range, 0-20.2) years. The 5-year LR-free survival rate was 94.9%. The frequencies of LR by age group were: <40 years--11.4%; 40-49 years--5.7%; 50-59 years--6.2%; 60-69 years--7.6%; 70 years and older--6.2%. The 5-year LR-free survival rates for these age groups were 90.5%, 95.4%, 95.5%, 95.4%, and 94.7%, respectively (P=0.09, log-rank test). On univariable analysis, patients aged<40 years were nearly twice as likely to experience LR (hazards ratio (HR), 1.81; P=0.012). Multivariable analysis of patients with complete data (n=2,122) demonstrated that age<40 years and node positivity were associated with increased risk of LR, whereas ER positivity and radiation therapy were associated with decreased risk.

CONCLUSIONS

Risk factors for LR after BCS include age<40 years, node positivity, ER negativity, and absence of adjuvant radiation therapy. Patients younger than age 40 years are at increased risk of LR after BCS.

摘要

背景

保乳手术后(BCS)的局部复发(LR)随危险因素而变化。本研究旨在评估年龄因素对 LR 的影响。

方法

本机构对所有接受 BCS 的患者(不包括接受新辅助化疗的患者)进行了识别和 LR 危险因素评估。

结果

共 3064 例患者行 3131 例 BCS。手术时的平均年龄为 61(范围,21-98)岁:175(5.6%)例患者年龄<40 岁;492(15.7%)例患者年龄 40-49 岁;761(24.3%)例患者年龄 50-59 岁;801(25.6%)例患者年龄 60-69 岁;902(28.8%)例患者年龄 70 岁及以上。212 例(6.8%)患者在 BCS 后平均 4.5(范围,0.1-14.4)年时发生 LR。中位随访时间为 8.9(范围,0-20.2)年。5 年无 LR 生存率为 94.9%。按年龄组划分的 LR 频率为:<40 岁-11.4%;40-49 岁-5.7%;50-59 岁-6.2%;60-69 岁-7.6%;70 岁及以上-6.2%。这些年龄组的 5 年无 LR 生存率分别为 90.5%、95.4%、95.5%、95.4%和 94.7%(P=0.09,对数秩检验)。单变量分析显示,<40 岁的患者发生 LR 的可能性几乎是两倍(风险比(HR)1.81;P=0.012)。对具有完整数据的 2122 例患者进行多变量分析显示,<40 岁和淋巴结阳性与 LR 风险增加相关,而 ER 阳性和放疗与 LR 风险降低相关。

结论

BCS 后 LR 的危险因素包括年龄<40 岁、淋巴结阳性、ER 阴性和缺乏辅助放疗。年龄<40 岁的患者在 BCS 后 LR 风险增加。

相似文献

1
Local recurrence after breast-conserving surgery: multivariable analysis of risk factors and the impact of young age.保乳手术后局部复发:多变量分析危险因素和年轻年龄的影响。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2012 Apr;19(4):1153-9. doi: 10.1245/s10434-011-2084-6. Epub 2011 Oct 12.
2
Influence of the time between surgery and radiotherapy on local recurrence in patients with lymph node-positive, early-stage, invasive breast carcinoma undergoing breast-conserving surgery: results of the French Adjuvant Study Group.手术与放疗间隔时间对接受保乳手术的淋巴结阳性早期浸润性乳腺癌患者局部复发的影响:法国辅助治疗研究组的结果
Cancer. 2005 Jul 15;104(2):240-50. doi: 10.1002/cncr.21161.
3
Breast-conserving treatment with or without radiotherapy in ductal carcinoma In Situ: 15-year recurrence rates and outcome after a recurrence, from the EORTC 10853 randomized phase III trial.保乳治疗联合或不联合放疗治疗导管原位癌:来自 EORTC 10853 随机 III 期试验的 15 年复发率和复发后的结果。
J Clin Oncol. 2013 Nov 10;31(32):4054-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2013.49.5077. Epub 2013 Sep 16.
4
Isolate local failure after breast-conserving treatment for early breast cancer, about 57 cases.早期乳腺癌保乳治疗后局部复发,约57例。
Cancer Radiother. 2004 Apr;8(2):95-107. doi: 10.1016/j.canrad.2004.01.002.
5
259 Patients with DCIS of the breast applying USC/Van Nuys prognostic index: a retrospective review with long term follow up.应用USC/范纽斯预后指数的259例乳腺导管原位癌患者:长期随访的回顾性研究
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2008 Jun;109(3):405-16. doi: 10.1007/s10549-007-9668-7. Epub 2007 Aug 9.
6
[Local relapse in young (< or = 40 years) women with breast cancer after mastectomy or breast conserving surgery: 15-year results].[40岁及以下年轻女性乳腺癌乳房切除或保乳手术后的局部复发:15年结果]
Magy Onkol. 2005;49(3):203, 205-8. Epub 2005 Oct 25.
7
Patients with t1 to t2 breast cancer with one to three positive nodes have higher local and regional recurrence risks compared with node-negative patients after breast-conserving surgery and whole-breast radiotherapy.与保乳手术和全乳放疗后的无淋巴结转移患者相比,有1至3个阳性淋巴结的T1至T2期乳腺癌患者有更高的局部和区域复发风险。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009 Feb 1;73(2):357-64. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.04.034.
8
[Breast-conservation treatment for early invasive breast cancer: prognostic factors for survival after salvage treatment of local recurrence].[早期浸润性乳腺癌的保乳治疗:局部复发挽救治疗后生存的预后因素]
Magy Onkol. 2007;51(2):127-31. Epub 2007 Jul 29.
9
Feasibility of breast-conserving surgery for patients with breast carcinoma associated with nipple discharge.乳头溢液相关乳腺癌患者保乳手术的可行性
Cancer. 2004 Aug 1;101(3):508-17. doi: 10.1002/cncr.20394.
10
Ductal intraepithelial neoplasia: postsurgical outcome for 1,267 women cared for in one single institution over 10 years.导管原位癌:10年间在一家机构接受治疗的1267名女性的术后结果。
Oncologist. 2009 Mar;14(3):201-12. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2008-0203. Epub 2009 Mar 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Symphony of rebirth: a retrospective comparative cohort study on heterologous breast reconstruction after radiotherapy.重生交响曲:一项关于放疗后异源性乳房重建的回顾性比较队列研究
Gland Surg. 2025 Jun 30;14(6):1024-1032. doi: 10.21037/gs-2024-552. Epub 2025 Jun 26.
2
Pattern and risk factors of isolated local relapse among women with hormone receptor-positive and HER2-negative breast cancer and lymph node involvement: 10-year follow-up analysis of the PACS 01 and PACS 04 trials.激素受体阳性和 HER2 阴性乳腺癌且淋巴结受累女性中孤立局部复发的模式和危险因素:PACS 01 和 PACS 04 试验的 10 年随访分析。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2023 Jun;199(2):371-379. doi: 10.1007/s10549-023-06912-4. Epub 2023 Mar 29.
3
A nomogram to identify appropriate candidates for breast-conserving surgery among young women with breast cancer: A large cohort study.
用于识别年轻乳腺癌女性中保乳手术合适候选者的列线图:一项大型队列研究。
Front Oncol. 2022 Oct 21;12:1012689. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1012689. eCollection 2022.
4
Age at initial diagnosis and prognosis of breast cancer: a nationwide multicenter retrospective study in China.乳腺癌的初次诊断年龄与预后:一项中国全国性多中心回顾性研究
Ann Transl Med. 2022 Aug;10(15):813. doi: 10.21037/atm-22-302.
5
Breast Cancer in Chinese Females Aged 25 Years and Younger.25岁及以下中国女性的乳腺癌
J Oncol. 2021 Nov 30;2021:4891936. doi: 10.1155/2021/4891936. eCollection 2021.
6
Evolving Trends in Surgical Management of Breast Cancer: An Analysis of 30 Years of Practice Changing Papers.乳腺癌外科治疗的发展趋势:对30年改变实践的论文的分析
Front Oncol. 2021 Aug 4;11:622621. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.622621. eCollection 2021.
7
Mutational landscape differences between young-onset and older-onset breast cancer patients.早发性与晚发性乳腺癌患者突变特征的差异。
BMC Cancer. 2020 Mar 12;20(1):212. doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-6684-z.
8
Impact of age on pathological complete response and locoregional recurrence in locally advanced breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.年龄对新辅助化疗后局部晚期乳腺癌病理完全缓解和局部区域复发的影响。
Biomed J. 2019 Feb;42(1):66-74. doi: 10.1016/j.bj.2018.10.007. Epub 2019 Mar 28.
9
Complete excision with narrow margins provides equivalent local control to wider excision in breast conservation for invasive cancer.对于浸润性癌的保乳治疗,广泛切除和窄切缘切除均能提供等效的局部控制效果。
BJS Open. 2018 Dec 12;3(2):161-168. doi: 10.1002/bjs5.50121. eCollection 2019 Apr.
10
Liposomal curcumin and its application in cancer.脂质体姜黄素及其在癌症中的应用。
Int J Nanomedicine. 2017 Aug 21;12:6027-6044. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S132434. eCollection 2017.