Suppr超能文献

灾难来袭时,医疗护理标准何去何从?

When disaster hits, where does the standard of care go?

作者信息

Cushman Esq Dawn

机构信息

Ryan, Datomi & Mosely LLP, Glendale, California, USA.

出版信息

J Healthc Risk Manag. 2011;31(2):6-13. doi: 10.1002/jhrm.20082.

Abstract

On July 22, 2011, it was reported in the news that a $25 million-dollar settlement was reached in a class-action lawsuit alleging that Memorial Medical Center in Louisiana failed to adequately prepare for the devastating catastrophe known as Hurricane Katrina. This magnitude of a claim raises serious questions regarding the viability of lawsuits and the lack of immunity available to hospital facilities, physicians, nurses and other healthcare providers for the provision of emergency aid during national disasters. This article is intended to address one aspect of the legal issues facing healthcare providers and to analyze the standard of care by which facilities and individual providers may be judged, measured and assessed following national disasters.

摘要

2011年7月22日,新闻报道称,一起集体诉讼达成了2500万美元的和解协议,该诉讼指控路易斯安那州的纪念医疗中心未能为被称为卡特里娜飓风的毁灭性灾难做好充分准备。如此巨额的索赔引发了关于诉讼可行性以及医院设施、医生、护士和其他医疗服务提供者在国家灾难期间提供紧急援助时缺乏豁免权的严重问题。本文旨在探讨医疗服务提供者面临的法律问题的一个方面,并分析在国家灾难之后用于评判、衡量和评估医疗机构及个体医疗服务提供者的护理标准。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验