• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过微计算机断层扫描评估 K 锉和 LightSpeed LSX 器械初始根尖适配性。

Initial apical fit of K-files versus LightSpeed LSX instruments assessed by micro-computed tomography.

机构信息

Division of Endodontology, Department of Preventive Dentistry, Periodontology and Cariology, University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.

出版信息

Int Endod J. 2012 Feb;45(2):169-76. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2011.01967.x. Epub 2011 Oct 12.

DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2591.2011.01967.x
PMID:21992481
Abstract

AIM

To compare the apical fit in two dimensions of the first K-file versus the first Lightspeed LSX instrument binding at working length after an initial crown-down preparation.

METHODOLOGY

Twenty maxillary molars with fully developed roots and four separate root canals were selected. Canals were pre-flared with ProFile.04 taper instruments to three quarters of estimated working length. Working length was electronically determined using a size 06 K-file. Progressively larger K-files were inserted passively to working length. The first binding K-file was termed initial apical file (IAF). Then, the first binding LSX initial apical lightspeed-instrument (IAL) was determined. Teeth were scanned with and without instruments in place using micro-computed tomography. Cross-sections of the apical part of the root canals were analysed as follows: the largest and smallest diameters of the root canal and the diameter of the instrument were calculated and related to each other. Statistics were performed using Kruskal-Wallis test and Wilcoxon test. The alpha-type error was set at 0.05.

RESULTS

Initial apical file sizes ranged from 8 to 30 and were lowest in second mesiobuccal and highest in palatal canals. IAL sizes ranged from size 20 to 40. The apical large canal diameter was assessed more accurately by the LSX instruments (P < 0.0001). However, the smallest available LSX instrument (i.e. size 20) did not reach working length in 39 of 80 canals.

CONCLUSIONS

Instruments with a flat widened tip were found to determine apical cross-sectional diameter better than round, tapered instruments.

摘要

目的

比较在初始冠向下预备后至工作长度时,第一根 K 锉和第一根 Lightspeed LSX 锉在二维方向上的根尖适配。

方法

选择 20 颗上颌磨牙,这些磨牙具有完全发育的根和 4 个独立的根管。使用 ProFile.04 锥度器械预扩根管至工作长度的四分之三。使用 6 号 K 锉确定工作长度,并用电子方法测量。然后用渐大的 K 锉被动插入至工作长度。第一根有适配的 K 锉称为初始根尖锉(IAF)。然后,确定第一根有适配的 LSX 初始根尖光高速器械(IAL)。用微计算机断层扫描(micro-computed tomography)在有和没有器械的情况下扫描牙齿。对根尖部分的根管进行横截面分析,计算根管的最大和最小直径以及器械的直径,并相互比较。使用 Kruskal-Wallis 检验和 Wilcoxon 检验进行统计学分析。设定 alpha 型错误为 0.05。

结果

IAF 的尺寸范围为 8 至 30,在第二近中颊侧根管中最小,在腭侧根管中最大。IAL 的尺寸范围为 20 至 40。LSX 器械更准确地评估根尖大根管直径(P < 0.0001)。然而,在 80 个根管中,有 39 个根管的最小可用 LSX 器械(即 20 号)未达到工作长度。

结论

与圆形、锥形器械相比,具有平宽尖端的器械在确定根尖横截面直径方面表现更好。

相似文献

1
Initial apical fit of K-files versus LightSpeed LSX instruments assessed by micro-computed tomography.通过微计算机断层扫描评估 K 锉和 LightSpeed LSX 器械初始根尖适配性。
Int Endod J. 2012 Feb;45(2):169-76. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2011.01967.x. Epub 2011 Oct 12.
2
Apical fit of initial K-files in maxillary molars assessed by micro-computed tomography.通过微计算机断层扫描评估上颌磨牙初始 K 锉的根尖适配。
Int Endod J. 2010 Apr;43(4):328-35. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2010.01685.x.
3
Effects of root canal preparation on apical geometry assessed by micro-computed tomography.通过显微计算机断层扫描评估根管预备对根尖形态的影响。
J Endod. 2009 Jul;35(7):1056-9. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2009.04.020.
4
An in vivo evaluation of two types of files used to accurately determine the diameter of the apical constriction of a root canal: an in vivo study.两种用于准确测定根管根尖狭窄部直径的锉的体内评估:一项体内研究。
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2009 Jul 1;10(4):43-50.
5
Influence of cervical preflaring on determination of apical file size in mandibular molars: SEM analysis.下颌磨牙中宫颈预扩对根尖锉大小确定的影响:扫描电镜分析
Braz Dent J. 2008;19(3):245-51. doi: 10.1590/s0103-64402008000300013.
6
Comparison in vivo of the first tapered and nontapered instruments that bind at the apical constriction.对在根尖狭窄处结合的第一代锥形和非锥形器械进行体内比较。
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2006 Sep;102(3):395-8. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2005.11.017. Epub 2006 Apr 21.
7
Influence of cervical preflaring on apical file size determination.宫颈预扩对根尖锉尺寸确定的影响。
Int Endod J. 2005 Jul;38(7):430-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2005.00946.x.
8
The quality of apical canal preparation using hand and rotary instruments with specific criteria for enlargement based on initial apical file size.使用手动和旋转器械按照基于初始根尖锉尺寸的特定扩大标准进行根尖根管预备的质量。
J Endod. 2002 Sep;28(9):658-64. doi: 10.1097/00004770-200209000-00008.
9
Influence of apical constriction diameter on Root ZX apex locator precision.根尖缩窄直径对Root ZX根尖定位仪精度的影响。
J Endod. 2007 Aug;33(8):995-8. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2007.05.009.
10
Determining the apical preparation size in premolars: part III.确定前磨牙的根尖预备尺寸:第三部分。
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2010 Jul;110(1):118-24. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2010.03.001.

引用本文的文献

1
The shaping and cleaning abilities of self-adjusting files in the preparation of canals with isthmuses after glidepath enlargement with ISO or ProTaper Universal NiTi files.在使用ISO或ProTaper通用镍钛锉进行引导通路扩大后,自调式锉在制备存在峡部的根管时的成形和清洁能力。
J Dent Sci. 2016 Mar;11(1):83-89. doi: 10.1016/j.jds.2015.09.004. Epub 2016 Jan 4.
2
Comparison of automatic and visual methods used for image segmentation in Endodontics: a microCT study.用于牙髓学中图像分割的自动和视觉方法的比较:microCT 研究。
J Appl Oral Sci. 2017 Nov-Dec;25(6):674-679. doi: 10.1590/1678-7757-2017-0023.
3
Working width, a deserted aspect of Endodontics.
工作宽度,牙髓病学中一个被忽视的方面。
Restor Dent Endod. 2015 Nov;40(4):334-5. doi: 10.5395/rde.2015.40.4.334. Epub 2015 Sep 23.
4
In Vitro Comparison of Raypex 6 and Endopilot Using a Novel, Computer-Aided Measurement System, for Determining the Working Length.使用新型计算机辅助测量系统对Raypex 6和Endopilot进行体外比较以确定工作长度
PLoS One. 2015 Aug 3;10(8):e0134383. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0134383. eCollection 2015.