• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于初始头影测量变量预测 Xbow 治疗中切牙前倾。

Prediction of lower incisor proclination during Xbow treatment based on initial cephalometric variables.

机构信息

Department of Dentistry, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.

出版信息

Angle Orthod. 2012 May;82(3):472-9. doi: 10.2319/072311-465.1. Epub 2011 Oct 13.

DOI:10.2319/072311-465.1
PMID:21992530
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8865830/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To predict lower incisor proclination from initial cephalometric values in Class II division 1 patients treated in phase I with the Xbow appliance.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Two hundred forty-nine mild to moderate Class II division 1 patients treated with the Xbow appliance as a phase I treatment were considered. Patients were in late mixed dentition or early permanent dentition. Commonly used cephalometric variables at T1 (before treatment) were used to predict lower incisor proclination after Xbow treatment (T2). A principal component analysis (PCA) was performed. The four extracted PCA components were skeletal component, incisal distance, anterior facial projection, and maxillo-mandibular relation. Thereafter, a multiple linear regression analysis (MLRA) was performed using the four extracted PCA components at T1 as predictor variables, and lower incisor inclination relative to the mandibular plane (L1-MP) at T2 as the dependent variable.

RESULTS

The mean L1-MP at T1 was 95.46 degrees and the mean L1-MP at T2 was 98.51 degrees, resulting in a mean difference of 3.04 degrees. Only incisal distance and maxillo-mandibular relation PCA components had significance (P < .05) according to the MLRA. The overall model gave an adjusted R2 value (coefficient of determination) of 0.091.

CONCLUSION

The best prediction model could account for only 9% of the total variability. Using common cephalometric variables at T1, average lower incisor proclination from Xbow treatment cannot be predicted in a clinically meaningful way.

摘要

目的

预测使用 Xbow 矫治器进行 I 期治疗的轻度至中度安氏Ⅱ类 1 分类错(牙合)患者的下切牙唇倾度。

材料与方法

共纳入 249 例使用 Xbow 矫治器进行 I 期治疗的轻度至中度安氏Ⅱ类 1 分类错(牙合)患者,患者处于混合牙列晚期或恒牙列早期。在 T1 时(治疗前)使用常用的头影测量变量来预测 Xbow 治疗后(T2)下切牙的唇倾度。进行主成分分析(PCA)。提取的 4 个 PCA 成分包括骨骼成分、切牙距离、前颜面投影和上下颌关系。然后,使用 T1 时提取的 4 个 PCA 成分作为预测变量,对 T2 时的下切牙相对于下颌平面的倾斜度(L1-MP)进行多元线性回归分析(MLRA)。

结果

T1 时的平均 L1-MP 为 95.46°,T2 时的平均 L1-MP 为 98.51°,平均差异为 3.04°。根据 MLRA,只有切牙距离和上下颌关系 PCA 成分有统计学意义(P<0.05)。整体模型的调整 R2 值(决定系数)为 0.091。

结论

最佳预测模型仅能解释总变异性的 9%。使用 T1 时的常用头影测量变量,无法以有临床意义的方式预测 Xbow 治疗后的平均下切牙唇倾度。

相似文献

1
Prediction of lower incisor proclination during Xbow treatment based on initial cephalometric variables.基于初始头影测量变量预测 Xbow 治疗中切牙前倾。
Angle Orthod. 2012 May;82(3):472-9. doi: 10.2319/072311-465.1. Epub 2011 Oct 13.
2
Lower incisor inclination changes during Xbow treatment according to vertical facial type.根据垂直面型,Xbow 治疗期间下切牙倾斜度会发生变化。
Angle Orthod. 2010 Nov;80(6):1075-80. doi: 10.2319/033110-180.1.
3
Short-term skeletal and dental effects of the Xbow appliance as measured on lateral cephalograms.根据头颅侧位片测量的XBow矫治器对骨骼和牙齿的短期影响。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009 Dec;136(6):822-32. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.01.021.
4
Twin Block appliance with acrylic capping does not have a significant inhibitory effect on lower incisor proclination.双颌前导矫治器加丙烯酸树脂帽对上颌切牙内倾的抑制作用不明显。
Angle Orthod. 2017 Jul;87(4):513-518. doi: 10.2319/102916-779.1. Epub 2017 Jan 27.
5
Effect of the MARA appliance on the position of the lower anteriors in children, adolescents and adults with Class II malocclusion.MARA矫治器对安氏II类错颌儿童、青少年及成人下前牙位置的影响。
J Orofac Orthop. 2007 Sep;68(5):397-412. doi: 10.1007/s00056-007-0656-7.
6
Retrospective comparison of dental and skeletal effects in the treatment of Class II malocclusion between Herbst and Xbow appliances.Herbst 矫治器与 Xbow 矫治器治疗安氏Ⅱ类错牙合的牙颌与骨骼疗效的回顾性比较
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2021 Oct;160(4):544-551. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2020.05.021. Epub 2021 Jul 15.
7
Incisor inclination changes produced by two compliance-free Class II correction protocols for the treatment of mild to moderate Class II malocclusions.两种免控型Ⅱ类矫正方案治疗轻中度Ⅱ类错颌畸形对切牙倾斜度的影响。
Angle Orthod. 2013 May;83(3):431-6. doi: 10.2319/062712-528.1. Epub 2012 Oct 3.
8
Long-term effects of Herbst treatment on the mandibular incisor segment: a cephalometric and biometric investigation.Herbst矫治器治疗对下颌切牙段的长期影响:一项头影测量和生物测量研究。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1997 Jul;112(1):92-103. doi: 10.1016/s0889-5406(97)70279-8.
9
Cephalometric appraisal of Class II treatment effects after functional and fixed appliances: a retrospective study.功能性矫治器和固定矫治器治疗安氏II类错牙合畸形效果的头影测量评估:一项回顾性研究
Eur J Orthod. 2017 Jun 1;39(3):334-341. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjw064.
10
A randomized clinical trial comparing mandibular incisor proclination produced by fixed labial appliances and clear aligners.一项比较固定唇侧矫治器和透明矫治器导致下颌切牙前倾情况的随机临床试验。
Angle Orthod. 2016 Sep;86(5):706-12. doi: 10.2319/101415-686.1.

引用本文的文献

1
Incisor inclination changes produced by two compliance-free Class II correction protocols for the treatment of mild to moderate Class II malocclusions.两种免控型Ⅱ类矫正方案治疗轻中度Ⅱ类错颌畸形对切牙倾斜度的影响。
Angle Orthod. 2013 May;83(3):431-6. doi: 10.2319/062712-528.1. Epub 2012 Oct 3.

本文引用的文献

1
A systematic review of the association between appliance-induced labial movement of mandibular incisors and gingival recession.关于矫治器引起的下颌切牙唇向移动与牙龈退缩之间关联的系统评价。
Aust Orthod J. 2011 May;27(1):33-9.
2
Lower incisor inclination changes during Xbow treatment according to vertical facial type.根据垂直面型,Xbow 治疗期间下切牙倾斜度会发生变化。
Angle Orthod. 2010 Nov;80(6):1075-80. doi: 10.2319/033110-180.1.
3
Orthodontic therapy and gingival recession: a systematic review.正畸治疗与牙龈退缩:系统评价。
Orthod Craniofac Res. 2010 Aug;13(3):127-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1601-6343.2010.01491.x.
4
Short-term skeletal and dental effects of the Xbow appliance as measured on lateral cephalograms.根据头颅侧位片测量的XBow矫治器对骨骼和牙齿的短期影响。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009 Dec;136(6):822-32. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.01.021.
5
Immediate skeletal and dentoalveolar effects of the crown- or banded type Herbst appliance on Class II division 1 malocclusion.冠式或带环式Herbst矫治器对安氏II类1分类错牙合畸形的即刻骨骼和牙牙槽效应。
Angle Orthod. 2008 Mar;78(2):361-9. doi: 10.2319/031107-123.1.
6
Skeletal and dental changes in Class II division 1 malocclusions treated with splint-type Herbst appliances. A systematic review.使用夹板式Herbst矫治器治疗安氏II类1分类错牙合的骨骼和牙齿变化。一项系统评价。
Angle Orthod. 2007 Mar;77(2):376-81. doi: 10.2319/0003-3219(2007)077[0376:SADCIC]2.0.CO;2.
7
Short-term treatment effects produced by the Herbst appliance in the mixed dentition.Herbst矫治器在混合牙列期产生的短期治疗效果。
Angle Orthod. 2005 Jul;75(4):540-7. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(2005)75[540:STEPBT]2.0.CO;2.
8
Long-term comparison of treatment outcome and stability of Class II patients treated with functional appliances versus bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy.功能性矫治器与双侧下颌升支矢状劈开截骨术治疗安氏II类患者的治疗效果及稳定性的长期比较
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005 Apr;127(4):451-64; quiz 516-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.03.028.
9
Prevalence of malocclusions in the early mixed dentition and orthodontic treatment need.早期混合牙列错颌畸形的患病率及正畸治疗需求
Eur J Orthod. 2004 Jun;26(3):237-44. doi: 10.1093/ejo/26.3.237.
10
Effects of headgear Herbst and mandibular step-by-step advancement versus conventional Herbst appliance and maximal jumping of the mandible.头帽 Herbst 矫治器与下颌逐步前伸联合应用与传统 Herbst 矫治器及下颌最大跳跃式前伸的效果比较
Eur J Orthod. 2002 Apr;24(2):167-74. doi: 10.1093/ejo/24.2.167.