Suppr超能文献

与采用21/7方案的含炔雌醇和屈螺酮的口服避孕药相比,一种采用24/4方案的含醋酸诺美孕酮和17β-雌二醇的单相复方口服避孕药的疗效和耐受性。

Efficacy and tolerability of a monophasic combined oral contraceptive containing nomegestrol acetate and 17β-oestradiol in a 24/4 regimen, in comparison to an oral contraceptive containing ethinylestradiol and drospirenone in a 21/7 regimen.

作者信息

Mansour Diana, Verhoeven Carole, Sommer Werner, Weisberg Edith, Taneepanichskul Surasak, Melis Gian Benedetto, Sundström-Poromaa Inger, Korver Tjeerd

机构信息

Sexual Health Services, Newcastle Hospitals Community Health, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.

出版信息

Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2011 Dec;16(6):430-43. doi: 10.3109/13625187.2011.614029. Epub 2011 Oct 13.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The primary objective was to assess the efficacy, cycle control and tolerability of a monophasic combined oral contraceptive (COC) containing nomegestrol acetate (NOMAC) and 17β-oestradiol (E2). Effects on acne were evaluated as a secondary objective. Results were compared to those of a COC containing drospirenone (DRSP) and ethinylestradiol (EE).

METHODS

Women (aged 18-50 years) were randomised to receive NOMAC/E2 (2.5 mg/1.5 mg) in a 24/4-day regimen (n=1591) or DRSP/EE (3 mg/30 μg) in a 21/7-day regimen (n=535) for 13 cycles.

RESULTS

Estimated Pearl Indices for NOMAC/E2 and DRSP/EE were 0.38 and 0.81 in women aged≤35 years and 0.31 and 0.66 for all women (18-50 years), respectively. Scheduled withdrawal bleedings were shorter and lighter among users of NOMAC/E2 and were sometimes absent altogether. Intracyclic bleeding/spotting was infrequent in both groups, and decreased over time. Type and frequency of adverse events were similar to those typically reported for COCs.

CONCLUSIONS

These data show that NOMAC/E2 provides high contraceptive efficacy with acceptable cycle control as well as an overall adverse event profile similar to that of DRSP/EE.

摘要

目的

主要目的是评估含有醋酸诺美孕酮(NOMAC)和17β - 雌二醇(E2)的单相复方口服避孕药(COC)的疗效、周期控制和耐受性。将对痤疮的影响作为次要目的进行评估。将结果与含有屈螺酮(DRSP)和炔雌醇(EE)的COC的结果进行比较。

方法

将年龄在18 - 50岁的女性随机分为两组,一组接受24/4天给药方案的NOMAC/E2(2.5毫克/1.5毫克)(n = 1591),另一组接受21/7天给药方案的DRSP/EE(3毫克/30微克)(n = 535),共治疗13个周期。

结果

年龄≤35岁的女性中,NOMAC/E2和DRSP/EE的估计 Pearl 指数分别为0.38和0.81;所有女性(18 - 50岁)中,这两个指数分别为0.31和0.66。NOMAC/E2使用者的计划性撤药性出血更短、更轻,有时甚至完全没有。两组的周期内出血/点滴出血情况均不常见,且随时间减少。不良事件的类型和频率与COC通常报告的相似。

结论

这些数据表明,NOMAC/E2具有高避孕效果,周期控制良好,总体不良事件情况与DRSP/EE相似。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da18/3233274/d9188a414ac3/dejc16-430-f1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验