• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

可以确定三项原则来定义诊断研究的成功。

Three principles to define the success of a diagnostic study could be identified.

机构信息

Clinical Epidemiology, Institute of Medical Biometry and Medical Informatics, Freiburg University Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany.

出版信息

J Clin Epidemiol. 2012 Mar;65(3):293-300. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.07.004. Epub 2011 Oct 13.

DOI:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.07.004
PMID:21995974
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Diagnostic studies are typically studies with two endpoints, sensitivity and specificity. To define the success of a diagnostic study, results for these two endpoints have to be combined in an appropriate manner.

STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING

Identification of criteria to define the success of a diagnostic study on a single binary test and investigation of common statistical approaches in relation to these criteria.

RESULTS

Three criteria for defining the overall success of a diagnostic study could be identified: a strong criterion, a liberal criterion, and a weak criterion. The strong criterion can be implemented by comparing the lower bounds of the confidence intervals for sensitivity and specificity with prespecified target values, as is typically done in many diagnostic studies. The liberal criterion allows a clinically meaningful compensation between sensitivity and specificity and can be implemented in different ways. If the liberal criterion is applied instead of the strong criterion, this can lead to a substantial reduction in the sample size required for a diagnostic study. The weak criterion is not very adequate for defining the success of a diagnostic study.

CONCLUSION

When planning and analyzing diagnostic studies, the criterion to define the success of the study should be clearly prespecified. The results of the statistical approach taken should be interpreted in accordance with this criterion. This ensures coherence of results and prevents unnecessarily large sample sizes. The liberal criterion should be paid more attention to in the future.

摘要

目的

诊断研究通常具有两个终点,即敏感性和特异性。为了定义诊断研究的成功,必须以适当的方式组合这两个终点的结果。

研究设计和环境

确定定义单个二进制测试的诊断研究成功的标准,并研究与这些标准相关的常见统计方法。

结果

可以确定三种定义诊断研究总体成功的标准:严格标准、宽松标准和弱标准。严格标准可以通过将敏感性和特异性的置信区间下限与预定的目标值进行比较来实现,这在许多诊断研究中通常都是这样做的。宽松标准允许在敏感性和特异性之间进行有临床意义的补偿,并且可以通过不同的方式来实现。如果应用宽松标准而不是严格标准,则可以大大减少诊断研究所需的样本量。弱标准对于定义诊断研究的成功不是很充分。

结论

在规划和分析诊断研究时,应明确规定定义研究成功的标准。应根据该标准解释所采用的统计方法的结果。这确保了结果的一致性,并防止了不必要的大样本量。在未来应更加关注宽松标准。

相似文献

1
Three principles to define the success of a diagnostic study could be identified.可以确定三项原则来定义诊断研究的成功。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2012 Mar;65(3):293-300. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.07.004. Epub 2011 Oct 13.
2
[Evaluation of diagnostic methods].[诊断方法的评估]
J Radiol. 2001 Feb;82(2):117-25.
3
Bayesian sample size for diagnostic test studies in the absence of a gold standard: Comparing identifiable with non-identifiable models.无金标准诊断试验研究的贝叶斯样本量:可识别与不可识别模型的比较。
Stat Med. 2010 Nov 20;29(26):2688-97. doi: 10.1002/sim.4037.
4
Simple nomograms to calculate sample size in diagnostic studies.用于计算诊断研究样本量的简易列线图。
Emerg Med J. 2005 Mar;22(3):180-1. doi: 10.1136/emj.2003.011148.
5
Sample size for diagnostic accuracy studies.诊断准确性研究的样本量
J Clin Epidemiol. 2004 Aug;57(8):869-70; author reply 871-2. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2004.02.008.
6
[Sample size determination in reference-controlled diagnostic trials].[参考对照诊断试验中的样本量确定]
Rofo. 2002 Nov;174(11):1438-44. doi: 10.1055/s-2002-35346.
7
Modified exact sample size for a binomial proportion with special emphasis on diagnostic test parameter estimation.针对二项比例的修正精确样本量,特别强调诊断试验参数估计。
Stat Med. 2005 Sep 30;24(18):2857-66. doi: 10.1002/sim.2146.
8
Evaluation of diagnostic tests for infectious diseases: general principles.传染病诊断检测的评估:一般原则
Nat Rev Microbiol. 2008 Nov;6(11 Suppl):S16-26.
9
Early detection of HIV in infants: aspects of design and analysis for diagnostic test studies.
Pediatr AIDS HIV Infect. 1995 Feb;6(1):3-13.
10
Size of treatment effects and their importance to clinical research and practice.治疗效果的大小及其对临床研究和实践的重要性。
Biol Psychiatry. 2006 Jun 1;59(11):990-6. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2005.09.014. Epub 2005 Dec 20.

引用本文的文献

1
A Seamless Design for the Combination of a Case-Control and a Cohort Diagnostic Accuracy Study.病例对照研究与队列诊断准确性研究相结合的无缝设计。
Stat Med. 2025 Mar 15;44(6):e70016. doi: 10.1002/sim.70016.
2
Bayesian sample size determination for diagnostic accuracy studies.贝叶斯诊断准确性研究的样本量估计。
Stat Med. 2022 Jul 10;41(15):2908-2922. doi: 10.1002/sim.9393. Epub 2022 Apr 10.
3
STARD 2015 guidelines for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies: explanation and elaboration.《STARD 2015诊断准确性研究报告指南:解释与详述》
BMJ Open. 2016 Nov 14;6(11):e012799. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012799.
4
FDG PET/CT in cancer: comparison of actual use with literature-based recommendations.18F-氟代脱氧葡萄糖正电子发射断层显像/计算机断层扫描在癌症中的应用:实际应用与基于文献的推荐意见的比较
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2016 Apr;43(4):695-706. doi: 10.1007/s00259-015-3217-0. Epub 2015 Oct 30.
5
Demonstrating the benefits of clinical nuclear imaging: is it time to add economic analysis?展示临床核成像的益处:是时候增加经济分析了吗?
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2014 Sep;41(9):1720-2. doi: 10.1007/s00259-014-2807-6.
6
Heterogeneous effect of two selectin gene polymorphisms on coronary artery disease risk: a meta-analysis.两种选择素基因多态性对冠心病风险的异质性影响:荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2014 Feb 3;9(2):e88152. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0088152. eCollection 2014.
7
Relationship of the p22phox (CYBA) gene polymorphism C242T with risk of coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis.p22phox(CYBA)基因 C242T 多态性与冠心病风险的关系:一项荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2013 Sep 5;8(9):e70885. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0070885. eCollection 2013.