• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

接受普拉格雷治疗的冠状动脉支架植入术患者的血小板反应残留、出血和治疗依从性。

Residual platelet reactivity, bleedings, and adherence to treatment in patients having coronary stent implantation treated with prasugrel.

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, Careggi Hospital, Florence, Italy.

出版信息

Am J Cardiol. 2012 Jan 15;109(2):214-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2011.08.034. Epub 2011 Oct 12.

DOI:10.1016/j.amjcard.2011.08.034
PMID:21996146
Abstract

Recent guidelines have recommended the use of aspirin and prasugrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. However, prasugrel use has been evaluated only in randomized trials. This study sought to evaluate bleeding rates and adherence to treatment in "real-world" patients treated with prasugrel. In total 298 consecutive patients 68 ± 10 years old (31% >75 years old) underwent stent implantation and received prasugrel therapy. Indications to prasugrel therapy were (1) ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction (41%), (2) drug-eluting stent implantation in diabetics (24%), (3) stent thrombosis (3%), (4) left main coronary artery drug-eluting stent implantation (6%), and (5) percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with high residual platelet reactivity on clopidogrel therapy (26%). All patients received a loading of prasugrel 60 mg. Patients ≥75 years old and with body weight ≤60 kg received a maintenance dose of 5 mg/day (10 mg/day for all the other patients). Follow-up data including adherence to prasugrel therapy were collected by telephone interviews or outpatient visits. Minimal follow-up length was 6 months (mean 9 ± 3). Major, minor, and minimal bleedings (Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction criteria) occurred in 2.7%, 4.7%, and 15.1% of enrolled patients. Low residual platelet reactivity (p = 0.001) and female gender (p = 0.29) were independent predictors of bleeding events. The most frequent minimal bleeding event was epistaxis. Only 8 patients (2.7%) permanently discontinued prasugrel therapy because of bleeding events (n = 4), possible side effects (n = 2), or medical decisions not associated with bleeding or side effects (n = 2). Fourteen patients (4.7%) temporarily discontinued prasugrel (average 6.5 days) mainly because of surgical procedures. No definite or probable stent thrombosis occurred, although 3 patients develop de novo myocardial infarction and 1 an ischemic stroke. There were 11 deaths because of heart failure or refractory cardiogenic shock in 9, pulmonary embolism in 1, and cancer in 1. In conclusion, in clinical practice, major and minor bleeding event rates associated with prasugrel therapy are comparable to those reported in controlled randomized trials. The minimal bleeding event rate is higher than reported but does not seem to affect adherence to treatment.

摘要

最近的指南建议,在接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的急性冠脉综合征患者中使用阿司匹林和普拉格雷。然而,普拉格雷的使用仅在随机试验中进行了评估。本研究旨在评估“真实世界”患者使用普拉格雷的出血率和治疗依从性。共有 298 例连续患者(68±10 岁,31%>75 岁)接受支架植入并接受普拉格雷治疗。普拉格雷治疗的适应证为:(1)ST 段抬高型急性心肌梗死(41%);(2)糖尿病患者药物洗脱支架植入(24%);(3)支架血栓形成(3%);(4)左主干药物洗脱支架植入(6%);(5)对氯吡格雷治疗后血小板反应性高的患者行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(26%)。所有患者均接受普拉格雷 60mg 负荷量。年龄≥75 岁且体重≤60kg 的患者给予 5mg/天维持剂量(其余患者给予 10mg/天)。通过电话访谈或门诊随访收集包括普拉格雷治疗依从性在内的随访数据。最小随访时间为 6 个月(平均 9±3 个月)。纳入患者中有 2.7%、4.7%和 15.1%发生主要、次要和最小出血(血栓溶解心肌梗死标准)。低残余血小板反应性(p=0.001)和女性(p=0.29)是出血事件的独立预测因子。最常见的最小出血事件是鼻出血。仅 8 例患者(2.7%)因出血事件(n=4)、可能的副作用(n=2)或与出血或副作用无关的医疗决策(n=2)而永久停用普拉格雷治疗。14 例患者(4.7%)因手术(平均 6.5 天)暂时停用普拉格雷。尽管 3 例患者新发心肌梗死,1 例发生缺血性卒中,但未发生明确或可能的支架血栓形成。因心力衰竭或难治性心源性休克死亡 9 例(其中 1 例因癌症死亡),肺栓塞 1 例,癌症 1 例。总之,在临床实践中,与普拉格雷治疗相关的主要和次要出血事件发生率与对照随机试验报告的相似。最小出血事件发生率高于报告,但似乎不影响治疗的依从性。

相似文献

1
Residual platelet reactivity, bleedings, and adherence to treatment in patients having coronary stent implantation treated with prasugrel.接受普拉格雷治疗的冠状动脉支架植入术患者的血小板反应残留、出血和治疗依从性。
Am J Cardiol. 2012 Jan 15;109(2):214-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2011.08.034. Epub 2011 Oct 12.
2
A randomized trial of prasugrel versus clopidogrel in patients with high platelet reactivity on clopidogrel after elective percutaneous coronary intervention with implantation of drug-eluting stents: results of the TRIGGER-PCI (Testing Platelet Reactivity In Patients Undergoing Elective Stent Placement on Clopidogrel to Guide Alternative Therapy With Prasugrel) study.普拉格雷与氯吡格雷治疗经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(经皮冠状动脉介入治疗)后氯吡格雷高血小板反应患者的随机试验:TRIGGER-PCI(在氯吡格雷治疗的择期支架置入患者中检测血小板反应以指导普拉格雷替代治疗的试验)研究结果。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 Jun 12;59(24):2159-64. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.02.026. Epub 2012 Apr 18.
3
Early and late benefits of prasugrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: a TRITON-TIMI 38 (TRial to Assess Improvement in Therapeutic Outcomes by Optimizing Platelet InhibitioN with Prasugrel-Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction) analysis.普拉格雷对接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的急性冠脉综合征患者的早期和晚期获益:TRITON-TIMI 38(通过普拉格雷优化血小板抑制评估治疗转归改善的试验-心肌梗死溶栓38)分析
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008 May 27;51(21):2028-33. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2008.04.002.
4
Efficacy and safety of intensive antiplatelet therapy with prasugrel from TRITON-TIMI 38 in a core clinical cohort defined by worldwide regulatory agencies.在由全球监管机构定义的核心临床队列中,普拉格雷强化抗血小板治疗的疗效和安全性:TRITON-TIMI 38 研究结果。
Am J Cardiol. 2011 Oct 1;108(7):905-11. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2011.05.020. Epub 2011 Aug 2.
5
Prasugrel monitoring and bleeding in real world patients.真实世界患者中普拉格雷的监测与出血。
Am J Cardiol. 2013 Jan 1;111(1):38-44. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2012.08.043. Epub 2012 Oct 2.
6
Elderly patients with acute coronary syndromes managed without revascularization: insights into the safety of long-term dual antiplatelet therapy with reduced-dose prasugrel versus standard-dose clopidogrel.未进行血运重建治疗的急性冠状动脉综合征老年患者:探讨长期应用小剂量普拉格雷双联抗血小板治疗与标准剂量氯吡格雷相比的安全性。
Circulation. 2013 Aug 20;128(8):823-33. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.002303. Epub 2013 Jul 12.
7
Effect of prasugrel versus clopidogrel on outcomes among patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention without stent implantation: a TRial to assess Improvement in Therapeutic Outcomes by optimizing platelet inhibitioN with prasugrel (TRITON)-Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) 38 substudy.普拉格雷与氯吡格雷对未植入支架行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的急性冠脉综合征患者预后的影响:一项通过优化血小板抑制作用评估普拉格雷改善治疗转归的试验(TRITON)-心肌梗死溶栓试验(TIMI)38亚组研究
Am Heart J. 2009 Sep;158(3):e21-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2009.06.021.
8
Optimizing P2Y12 receptor inhibition in patients with acute coronary syndrome on the basis of platelet function testing: impact of prasugrel and high-dose clopidogrel.基于血小板功能检测优化急性冠脉综合征患者的 P2Y12 受体抑制:普拉格雷和高剂量氯吡格雷的影响。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Mar 25;63(11):1061-70. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.12.023. Epub 2014 Jan 30.
9
Triple therapy with aspirin, prasugrel, and vitamin K antagonists in patients with drug-eluting stent implantation and an indication for oral anticoagulation.接受药物洗脱支架置入术且有口服抗凝适应证的患者使用阿司匹林、普拉格雷和维生素 K 拮抗剂三联治疗。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 May 21;61(20):2060-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.02.036. Epub 2013 Mar 21.
10
The efficacy and safety of prasugrel with and without a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor in patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing percutaneous intervention: a TRITON-TIMI 38 (Trial to Assess Improvement in Therapeutic Outcomes by Optimizing Platelet Inhibition With Prasugrel-Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction 38) analysis.普拉格雷联合或不联合糖蛋白IIb/IIIa抑制剂在接受经皮介入治疗的急性冠脉综合征患者中的疗效与安全性:TRITON-TIMI 38(通过优化普拉格雷血小板抑制评估治疗转归改善情况-心肌梗死溶栓试验38)分析
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009 Aug 18;54(8):678-85. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.05.025.

引用本文的文献

1
An optimal window of platelet reactivity by LTA assay for patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者通过光比浊法测定血小板反应性的最佳窗口期。
Thromb J. 2021 Oct 19;19(1):73. doi: 10.1186/s12959-021-00323-5.
2
No Differences in Gastrointestinal Bleeding Risk among Clopidogrel-, Ticagrelor-, or Prasugrel-Based Dual Antiplatelet Therapy.基于氯吡格雷、替格瑞洛或普拉格雷的双联抗血小板治疗在胃肠道出血风险方面无差异。
J Clin Med. 2020 May 18;9(5):1526. doi: 10.3390/jcm9051526.
3
Platelet CD40 ligand and bleeding during P2Y12 inhibitor treatment in acute coronary syndrome.
急性冠状动脉综合征患者接受P2Y12抑制剂治疗期间血小板CD40配体与出血情况
Res Pract Thromb Haemost. 2019 Jul 26;3(4):684-694. doi: 10.1002/rth2.12244. eCollection 2019 Oct.
4
Comparison of lower loading dose of prasugrel with conventional loading dose of prasugrel in Indian patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions.印度接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者中普拉格雷低负荷剂量与传统负荷剂量的比较。
Indian Heart J. 2018 Dec;70 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):S319-S322. doi: 10.1016/j.ihj.2018.08.004. Epub 2018 Aug 18.
5
Antiplatelet Therapy in ACS Patients: Comparing Appropriate P2Y12 Inhibition by Clopidogrel to the Use of New P2Y12 Inhibitors.急性冠脉综合征患者的抗血小板治疗:比较氯吡格雷对 P2Y12 的适当抑制与新型 P2Y12 抑制剂的应用。
J Atheroscler Thromb. 2018 Aug 1;25(8):674-689. doi: 10.5551/jat.40584. Epub 2018 Feb 8.
6
Platelet Aggregometry Testing: Molecular Mechanisms, Techniques and Clinical Implications.血小板聚集检测:分子机制、技术及临床意义
Int J Mol Sci. 2017 Aug 18;18(8):1803. doi: 10.3390/ijms18081803.
7
Bleeding events and maintenance dose of prasugrel: BLESS pilot study.普拉格雷的出血事件及维持剂量:BLESS初步研究
Open Heart. 2016 Oct 31;3(2):e000460. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2016-000460. eCollection 2016.
8
Predictive performance of adding platelet reactivity on top of CRUSADE score for 1-year bleeding risk in patients with acute coronary syndrome.在急性冠脉综合征患者中,在CRUSADE评分基础上增加血小板反应性对1年出血风险的预测性能。
J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2016 Oct;42(3):360-8. doi: 10.1007/s11239-016-1366-z.
9
Personalized antiplatelet therapy with P2Y12 receptor inhibitors: benefits and pitfalls.使用P2Y12受体抑制剂的个性化抗血小板治疗:益处与陷阱
Postepy Kardiol Interwencyjnej. 2015;11(4):259-80. doi: 10.5114/pwki.2015.55596. Epub 2015 Jan 12.
10
Evaluation of the F2R IVS-14A/T PAR1 polymorphism with subsequent cardiovascular events and bleeding in patients who have undergone percutaneous coronary intervention.评估F2R基因内含子14A/T蛋白酶激活受体1(PAR1)多态性与接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者随后发生的心血管事件及出血情况。
J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2016 May;41(4):656-62. doi: 10.1007/s11239-015-1285-4.