Gawronski K, Rzepecki P, Oborska S, Wasko-Grabowska A
Bone Marrow Transplantation Unit, Department of Oncology, Military Institute of Medicine, Warsaw, Poland.
Transplant Proc. 2011 Oct;43(8):3114-5. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2011.08.006.
We sought to compare hematologic recovery between patients who did or did not receive granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF)-stimulated bone marrow (rich bone marrow [RBM]).
The study subjects were 20 patients whose bone marrow was taken without prior stimulation with G-CSF and 15 patients in whom bone marrow was taken after previous G-CSF mobilization. The bone marrow harvest took place on the fifth day after G-CSF initiation. The bone marrow aliquot was 20 mL/kg.
The median value of nucleated cells obtained from patients without G-CSF preparation was 3.65×10(8)/kg. The median value of nucleated cells from RBM patients was 4.83×10(8)/kg. The median value of stem cells obtained from patients without G-CSF preparation was 0.96×10(6)/kg versus 1.9×10(6)/kg from RBM patients. The median time to recovery of the hematopoietic system based on an increase in PLT value>20 g/L was 12.6 days for RBM versus 18.8 days without G-CSF preparation. The median time to recovery of the hematopoietic system based on assessment of growth ANC>0.5 g/L was 13.0 days for RBM versus 17.8 days without G-CSF stimulation. Significantly higher values of nucleated cells and increased stem cells were observed among RBM patients compared with those whose bone marrow was harvested without any stimulation (P=.01). There was faster recovery of the hematopoietic system in cases where bone marrow was collected after G-CSF: PLT>20 g/L (P=.015) and ANC>0.5 g/L (P=.01). We also observed that the use of stimulated bone marrow shortened hospital stay after the administration of hematopoietic cells to 17.3 days compared with 23.1 days among patients receiving hematopoietic cells from nonstimulated bone marrow. The number of complications during transplantation was comparable in both cases, the most frequent ones being febrile neutropenia and grade III and IV mucositis.
RBM is a better method to obtain stem cells from bone marrow. Stimulated bone marrow shows faster engraftment compared with nonstimulated bone marrow helping patients who fail to generate are adequate number of stem cells from peripheral blood.
我们试图比较接受或未接受粒细胞集落刺激因子(G-CSF)刺激的骨髓(富含骨髓[RBM])的患者之间的血液学恢复情况。
研究对象为20例未预先接受G-CSF刺激采集骨髓的患者和15例先前接受G-CSF动员后采集骨髓的患者。骨髓采集在开始使用G-CSF后的第5天进行。骨髓等分试样为20 mL/kg。
未进行G-CSF预处理的患者获得的有核细胞中位数为3.65×10⁸/kg。RBM患者有核细胞中位数为4.83×10⁸/kg。未进行G-CSF预处理的患者获得的干细胞中位数为0.96×10⁶/kg,而RBM患者为1.9×10⁶/kg。基于血小板计数(PLT)值增加>20 g/L的造血系统恢复中位时间,RBM患者为12.6天,未进行G-CSF预处理的患者为18.8天。基于中性粒细胞绝对值(ANC)增长评估>0.5 g/L的造血系统恢复中位时间,RBM患者为13.0天,未接受G-CSF刺激的患者为17.8天。与未接受任何刺激采集骨髓的患者相比,RBM患者的有核细胞值显著更高,干细胞数量增加(P = 0.01)。在使用G-CSF后采集骨髓的情况下,造血系统恢复更快:PLT>20 g/L(P = 0.015)和ANC>0.5 g/L(P = 0.01)。我们还观察到,与接受未刺激骨髓造血细胞的患者相比,使用刺激骨髓将造血细胞给药后的住院时间缩短至17.3天,而未刺激骨髓组为23.1天。移植期间并发症的数量在两种情况下相当,最常见的是发热性中性粒细胞减少和III级及IV级粘膜炎。
RBM是从骨髓中获取干细胞的更好方法。与未刺激骨髓相比,刺激骨髓显示出更快的植入,有助于那些无法从外周血中产生足够数量干细胞的患者。