• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较脉冲放线菌素 D 与 5 天甲氨蝶呤治疗低危型妊娠滋养细胞肿瘤。

Comparison of pulsed actinomycin D versus 5-day methotrexate for the treatment of low-risk gestational trophoblastic disease.

机构信息

Department of Gynecological Oncology, Vali-e-Asr Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

出版信息

Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2012 Jan;116(1):39-42. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2011.08.003. Epub 2011 Oct 11.

DOI:10.1016/j.ijgo.2011.08.003
PMID:21996593
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine the effectiveness of 2 standard chemotherapy regimens for low-risk gestational trophoblastic disease according to the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) staging system.

METHODS

From 2008 until 2010, 75 women with low-risk gestational trophoblastic disease received either pulsed actinomycin D (n=50) or 5-day methotrexate (n=25). The primary remission rate, the duration of treatment, the number of treatment courses, and the adverse effects were compared.

RESULTS

The complete remission rates were 90% for the actinomycin D group and 68% for the methotrexate group (P=0.018). The mean number of chemotherapy courses administered to achieve complete remission (including courses of second-line therapy) was 3.1 in the methotrexate group and 5.3 in the actinomycin D group (P=0.01). No major adverse effects were experienced in either treatment group and there were no significant differences in terms of adverse effects. Second-line chemotherapy was indicated for 11 patients.

CONCLUSION

Based on the present study, pulsed actinomycin D seems to be an appropriate first-line treatment for patients with low-risk gestational trophoblastic disease.

摘要

目的

根据国际妇产科联合会(FIGO)分期系统,确定 2 种标准化疗方案治疗低危妊娠滋养细胞疾病的疗效。

方法

2008 年至 2010 年,75 例低危妊娠滋养细胞疾病患者接受了脉冲放线菌素 D(n=50)或 5 天甲氨蝶呤(n=25)治疗。比较了主要缓解率、治疗持续时间、治疗疗程数和不良反应。

结果

放线菌素 D 组完全缓解率为 90%,甲氨蝶呤组为 68%(P=0.018)。达到完全缓解(包括二线治疗疗程)所需的平均化疗疗程数,甲氨蝶呤组为 3.1 个,放线菌素 D 组为 5.3 个(P=0.01)。两组均未出现严重不良反应,且不良反应无显著差异。11 例患者需要二线化疗。

结论

根据本研究,脉冲放线菌素 D 似乎是低危妊娠滋养细胞疾病患者的一种合适的一线治疗方法。

相似文献

1
Comparison of pulsed actinomycin D versus 5-day methotrexate for the treatment of low-risk gestational trophoblastic disease.比较脉冲放线菌素 D 与 5 天甲氨蝶呤治疗低危型妊娠滋养细胞肿瘤。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2012 Jan;116(1):39-42. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2011.08.003. Epub 2011 Oct 11.
2
Pulse methotrexate versus pulse actinomycin D in the treatment of low-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia.甲氨蝶呤脉冲疗法与放线菌素D脉冲疗法治疗低危妊娠滋养细胞肿瘤的比较
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2008 Oct;103(1):33-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2008.05.013. Epub 2008 Jul 16.
3
Actinomycin D for methotrexate-failed low-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia.放线菌素D用于甲氨蝶呤治疗失败的低危妊娠滋养细胞肿瘤。
J Reprod Med. 2012 Jul-Aug;57(7-8):283-7.
4
Treatment of nonmetastatic and metastatic low-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia: factors associated with resistance to single-agent methotrexate chemotherapy.非转移性和转移性低危妊娠滋养细胞肿瘤的治疗:对单药甲氨蝶呤化疗耐药的相关因素。
Gynecol Oncol. 2012 Jun;125(3):572-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2012.03.039. Epub 2012 Mar 23.
5
Evaluation of weekly intramuscular methotrexate in the treatment of low risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia.每周肌肉注射甲氨蝶呤治疗低危妊娠滋养细胞肿瘤的疗效评估。
J Cancer Res Ther. 2014 Jul-Sep;10(3):646-50. doi: 10.4103/0973-1482.138199.
6
Five-Day Intravascular Methotrexate Versus Biweekly Actinomycin-D in the Treatment of Low-Risk Gestational Trophoblastic Neoplasia: A Clinical Randomized Trial.五日血管内注射甲氨蝶呤与每两周一次放线菌素-D治疗低危妊娠滋养细胞肿瘤的临床随机试验
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2016 Jun;26(5):971-6. doi: 10.1097/IGC.0000000000000687.
7
Are different methotrexate regimens as first line therapy for low risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia more cost effective than the dactinomycin regimen used in GOG 0174?对于低风险妊娠滋养细胞肿瘤,不同的甲氨蝶呤方案作为一线治疗,是否比妇科肿瘤学组(GOG)0174中使用的放线菌素方案更具成本效益?
Gynecol Oncol. 2017 Jan;144(1):125-129. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2016.10.038. Epub 2016 Nov 3.
8
Comparison of pulsed actinomycin D and 5-day actinomycin D as first-line chemotherapy for low-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia.脉冲放线菌素 D 与 5 天放线菌素 D 一线化疗低危型妊娠滋养细胞肿瘤的比较。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2018 Nov;143(2):225-231. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.12629. Epub 2018 Aug 16.
9
Treatment of low-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia comparing biweekly eight-day Methotrexate with folinic acid versus bolus-dose Actinomycin-D, among Brazilian women.巴西女性中低风险妊娠滋养细胞肿瘤的治疗:双周8天甲氨蝶呤联合亚叶酸与大剂量放线菌素D的比较
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2015 Jun;37(6):258-65. doi: 10.1590/SO100-720320150005366.
10
Treatment for low-risk gestational trophoblastic disease: comparison of single-agent methotrexate, dactinomycin and combination regimens.低危妊娠滋养细胞疾病的治疗:单药甲氨蝶呤、放线菌素D与联合方案的比较
Gynecol Oncol. 2008 Jan;108(1):149-53. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2007.09.006. Epub 2007 Oct 10.

引用本文的文献

1
First-line monodrug chemotherapy in low-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia: a network meta-analysis.低风险妊娠滋养细胞肿瘤的一线单药化疗:一项网状Meta分析
Front Oncol. 2024 Jan 5;13:1276771. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1276771. eCollection 2023.
2
Resistance to single-agent chemotherapy in low-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia.低危妊娠滋养细胞肿瘤对单药化疗的耐药性。
Caspian J Intern Med. 2023 Winter;14(1):47-52. doi: 10.22088/cjim.14.1.47.
3
Direct comparisons of efficacy and safety between actinomycin-D and methotrexate in women with low-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia: a meta-analysis of randomized and high-quality non-randomized studies.
比较低危型妊娠滋养细胞肿瘤患者应用放线菌素 D 和甲氨蝶呤的疗效和安全性:一项随机和高质量非随机研究的荟萃分析。
BMC Cancer. 2021 Oct 18;21(1):1122. doi: 10.1186/s12885-021-08849-7.
4
Cost-effectiveness of second curettage for treatment of low-risk non-metastatic gestational trophoblastic neoplasia.二次刮宫治疗低危非转移性妊娠滋养细胞肿瘤的成本效益分析。
Gynecol Oncol. 2020 Jun;157(3):711-715. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.03.029. Epub 2020 Apr 8.
5
Pulse actinomycin D as first-line treatment of low-risk post-molar non-choriocarcinoma gestational trophoblastic neoplasia.低危绒癌性妊娠滋养细胞肿瘤一线治疗采用放线菌素 D 脉冲疗法。
BMC Cancer. 2018 May 23;18(1):585. doi: 10.1186/s12885-018-4512-5.
6
Prophylactic chemotherapy for hydatidiform mole to prevent gestational trophoblastic neoplasia.预防性化疗用于葡萄胎以预防妊娠滋养细胞肿瘤。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Sep 11;9(9):CD007289. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007289.pub3.
7
Comparing and evaluating the efficacy of methotrexate and actinomycin D as first-line single chemotherapy agents in low risk gestational trophoblastic disease.比较和评估甲氨蝶呤与放线菌素D作为低危妊娠滋养细胞疾病一线单药化疗药物的疗效。
J Gynecol Oncol. 2017 Mar;28(2):e8. doi: 10.3802/jgo.2017.28.e8. Epub 2016 Oct 7.
8
Are different methotrexate regimens as first line therapy for low risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia more cost effective than the dactinomycin regimen used in GOG 0174?对于低风险妊娠滋养细胞肿瘤,不同的甲氨蝶呤方案作为一线治疗,是否比妇科肿瘤学组(GOG)0174中使用的放线菌素方案更具成本效益?
Gynecol Oncol. 2017 Jan;144(1):125-129. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2016.10.038. Epub 2016 Nov 3.
9
First-line chemotherapy in low-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia.低危妊娠滋养细胞肿瘤的一线化疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Jun 9;2016(6):CD007102. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007102.pub4.
10
Comparison of the efficacy of methotrexate and actinomycin D in the treatment of patients with stage I low risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (GTN).甲氨蝶呤与放线菌素D治疗Ⅰ期低危妊娠滋养细胞肿瘤(GTN)患者的疗效比较。
Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2014 Jul 22;28:78. eCollection 2014.