振动触觉感觉替代物体操作：幅度调制与脉冲串频率调制。
Vibrotactile sensory substitution for object manipulation: amplitude versus pulse train frequency modulation.
机构信息
Boston University, Boston, MA 02215, USA.
出版信息
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2012 Jan;20(1):31-7. doi: 10.1109/TNSRE.2011.2170856. Epub 2011 Oct 13.
Abstract
Incorporating sensory feedback with prosthetic devices is now possible, but the optimal methods of providing such feedback are still unknown. The relative utility of amplitude and pulse train frequency modulated stimulation paradigms for providing vibrotactile feedback for object manipulation was assessed in 10 participants. The two approaches were studied during virtual object manipulation using a robotic interface as a function of presentation order and a simultaneous cognitive load. Despite the potential pragmatic benefits associated with pulse train frequency modulated vibrotactile stimulation, comparison of the approach with amplitude modulation indicates that amplitude modulation vibrotactile stimulation provides superior feedback for object manipulation.
摘要
现在已经可以将感觉反馈与假肢设备结合使用，但提供这种反馈的最佳方法仍不清楚。本研究评估了 10 名参与者在使用机器人界面进行虚拟物体操作时，两种振幅和脉冲串频率调制刺激模式在提供用于操纵物体的振动触觉反馈方面的相对效用，研究了这两种方法作为呈现顺序和同时认知负荷的函数。尽管脉冲串频率调制振动触觉刺激具有潜在的实际益处，但与振幅调制的比较表明，振幅调制振动触觉刺激为物体操纵提供了更好的反馈。
相似文献
1
Vibrotactile sensory substitution for object manipulation: amplitude versus pulse train frequency modulation.振动触觉感觉替代物体操作：幅度调制与脉冲串频率调制。
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2012 Jan;20(1):31-7. doi: 10.1109/TNSRE.2011.2170856. Epub 2011 Oct 13.
2
Object manipulation improvements due to single session training outweigh the differences among stimulation sites during vibrotactile feedback.单次训练引起的物体操作改善超过振动触觉反馈中刺激部位之间的差异。
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2011 Dec;19(6):677-85. doi: 10.1109/TNSRE.2011.2168981. Epub 2011 Oct 6.
3
Repeated training with augmentative vibrotactile feedback increases object manipulation performance.重复使用增强型振动触觉反馈进行训练可提高物体操作性能。
PLoS One. 2012;7(2):e32743. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0032743. Epub 2012 Feb 27.
4
Vibrotactile feedback aids EMG control of object manipulation.振动触觉反馈有助于通过肌电图控制物体操作。
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2011;2011:1061-4. doi: 10.1109/IEMBS.2011.6090247.
5
Vibrotactile sensory substitution for electromyographic control of object manipulation.基于肌电控制的对象操作的振动触觉感觉替代。
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2013 Aug;60(8):2226-32. doi: 10.1109/TBME.2013.2252174. Epub 2013 Mar 11.
6
Vibrotactile grasping force and hand aperture feedback for myoelectric forearm prosthesis users.用于肌电前臂假肢使用者的振动触觉抓握力和手孔反馈
Prosthet Orthot Int. 2015 Jun;39(3):204-12. doi: 10.1177/0309364614522260. Epub 2014 Feb 24.
7
Multi-day training with vibrotactile feedback for virtual object manipulation.用于虚拟物体操作的多日振动触觉反馈训练。
IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot. 2011;2011:5975337. doi: 10.1109/ICORR.2011.5975337.
8
Real-time vibrotactile pattern generation and identification using discrete event-driven feedback.基于离散事件驱动反馈的实时振动触觉模式生成与识别。
Somatosens Mot Res. 2024 Jun;41(2):77-89. doi: 10.1080/08990220.2023.2175811. Epub 2023 Feb 7.
9
Discrete Vibro-Tactile Feedback Prevents Object Slippage in Hand Prostheses More Intuitively Than Other Modalities.离散振动触觉反馈比其他模态更直观地防止手部假肢中的物体滑动。
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2018 Aug;26(8):1577-1584. doi: 10.1109/TNSRE.2018.2851617. Epub 2018 Jun 29.
10
Relative to direct haptic feedback, remote vibrotactile feedback improves but slows object manipulation.相对于直接触觉反馈，远程振动触觉反馈虽有改善，但会减慢物体操作。
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2010;2010:2089-92. doi: 10.1109/IEMBS.2010.5626120.
引用本文的文献
1
Measuring mental workload in assistive wearable devices: a review.辅助可穿戴设备中精神工作负荷的测量：综述。
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2021 Nov 7;18(1):160. doi: 10.1186/s12984-021-00953-w.
2
Grasping Embodiment: Haptic Feedback for Artificial Limbs.把握具身性：人工肢体的触觉反馈
Front Neurorobot. 2021 May 26;15:662397. doi: 10.3389/fnbot.2021.662397. eCollection 2021.
3
A Review of Sensory Feedback in Upper-Limb Prostheses From the Perspective of Human Motor Control.从人类运动控制角度对上肢体假肢感觉反馈的综述
Front Neurosci. 2020 Jun 23;14:345. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2020.00345. eCollection 2020.
4
Effects of vibrotactile feedback and grasp interface compliance on perception and control of a sensorized myoelectric hand.振动触觉反馈和抓握界面顺应性对传感器化肌电手感知和控制的影响。
PLoS One. 2019 Jan 16;14(1):e0210956. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0210956. eCollection 2019.
5
The critical stability task: quantifying sensory-motor control during ongoing movement in nonhuman primates.关键稳定性任务：量化非人类灵长类动物在持续运动过程中的感觉运动控制。
J Neurophysiol. 2018 Nov 1;120(5):2164-2181. doi: 10.1152/jn.00300.2017. Epub 2018 Jun 27.
6
Neurorehabilitation in upper limb amputation: understanding how neurophysiological changes can affect functional rehabilitation.上肢截肢后的神经康复：了解神经生理变化如何影响功能康复。
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2017 May 22;14(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s12984-017-0256-8.
7
Effects of kinematic vibrotactile feedback on learning to control a virtual prosthetic arm.运动触觉反馈对学习控制虚拟假肢手臂的影响。
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2015 Mar 24;12:31. doi: 10.1186/s12984-015-0025-5.
8
Combined Auditory and Vibrotactile Feedback for Human-Machine-Interface Control.用于人机界面控制的听觉与振动触觉联合反馈
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2014 Jan;22(1):62-8. doi: 10.1109/TNSRE.2013.2273177. Epub 2013 Jul 31.
9
Augmented visual, auditory, haptic, and multimodal feedback in motor learning: a review.增强视觉、听觉、触觉和多模态反馈在运动学习中的应用：综述。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2013 Feb;20(1):21-53. doi: 10.3758/s13423-012-0333-8.
本文引用的文献
1
Multi-day training with vibrotactile feedback for virtual object manipulation.用于虚拟物体操作的多日振动触觉反馈训练。
IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot. 2011;2011:5975337. doi: 10.1109/ICORR.2011.5975337.
2
Relative to direct haptic feedback, remote vibrotactile feedback improves but slows object manipulation.相对于直接触觉反馈，远程振动触觉反馈虽有改善，但会减慢物体操作。
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2010;2010:2089-92. doi: 10.1109/IEMBS.2010.5626120.
3
Consumer design priorities for upper limb prosthetics.上肢假肢的消费者设计优先事项。
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2007 Nov;2(6):346-57. doi: 10.1080/17483100701714733.
4
Control of a six degree of freedom prosthetic arm after targeted muscle reinnervation surgery.靶向肌肉神经再支配手术后对六自由度假臂的控制。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008 Nov;89(11):2057-65. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2008.05.016.
5
Supracutaneous vibrotactile perception threshold at various non-glabrous body loci.不同非光滑身体部位的皮下振动触觉感知阈值。
Ergonomics. 2008 Jun;51(6):920-34. doi: 10.1080/00140130701809341.
6
Results of an Internet survey of myoelectric prosthetic hand users.肌电假肢手使用者的网络调查结果。
Prosthet Orthot Int. 2007 Dec;31(4):362-70. doi: 10.1080/03093640601061265.
7
Visual and haptic feedback contribute to tuning and online control during object manipulation.视觉和触觉反馈有助于在物体操纵过程中进行调整和在线控制。
J Mot Behav. 2007 May;39(3):179-93. doi: 10.3200/JMBR.39.3.179-193.
8
Design of a cybernetic hand for perception and action.用于感知与行动的控制论手的设计
Biol Cybern. 2006 Dec;95(6):629-44. doi: 10.1007/s00422-006-0124-2. Epub 2006 Dec 6.
9
Time-course of vibratory adaptation and recovery in cutaneous mechanoreceptive afferents.皮肤机械感受器传入纤维的振动适应和恢复的时间进程。
J Neurophysiol. 2005 Nov;94(5):3037-45. doi: 10.1152/jn.00001.2005.
10
Some neglected possibilities of communication.
Science. 1960 May 27;131(3413):1583-8. doi: 10.1126/science.131.3413.1583.
Zotero 插件