振动触觉感觉替代物体操作：幅度调制与脉冲串频率调制。
Vibrotactile sensory substitution for object manipulation: amplitude versus pulse train frequency modulation.
机构信息
Boston University, Boston, MA 02215, USA.
出版信息
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2012 Jan;20(1):31-7. doi: 10.1109/TNSRE.2011.2170856. Epub 2011 Oct 13.
Abstract
Incorporating sensory feedback with prosthetic devices is now possible, but the optimal methods of providing such feedback are still unknown. The relative utility of amplitude and pulse train frequency modulated stimulation paradigms for providing vibrotactile feedback for object manipulation was assessed in 10 participants. The two approaches were studied during virtual object manipulation using a robotic interface as a function of presentation order and a simultaneous cognitive load. Despite the potential pragmatic benefits associated with pulse train frequency modulated vibrotactile stimulation, comparison of the approach with amplitude modulation indicates that amplitude modulation vibrotactile stimulation provides superior feedback for object manipulation.
摘要
现在已经可以将感觉反馈与假肢设备结合使用，但提供这种反馈的最佳方法仍不清楚。本研究评估了 10 名参与者在使用机器人界面进行虚拟物体操作时，两种振幅和脉冲串频率调制刺激模式在提供用于操纵物体的振动触觉反馈方面的相对效用，研究了这两种方法作为呈现顺序和同时认知负荷的函数。尽管脉冲串频率调制振动触觉刺激具有潜在的实际益处，但与振幅调制的比较表明，振幅调制振动触觉刺激为物体操纵提供了更好的反馈。
相似文献
1
Vibrotactile sensory substitution for object manipulation: amplitude versus pulse train frequency modulation.
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2012 Jan;20(1):31-7. doi: 10.1109/TNSRE.2011.2170856. Epub 2011 Oct 13.
2
Object manipulation improvements due to single session training outweigh the differences among stimulation sites during vibrotactile feedback.
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2011 Dec;19(6):677-85. doi: 10.1109/TNSRE.2011.2168981. Epub 2011 Oct 6.
3
Repeated training with augmentative vibrotactile feedback increases object manipulation performance.
PLoS One. 2012;7(2):e32743. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0032743. Epub 2012 Feb 27.
4
Vibrotactile feedback aids EMG control of object manipulation.
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2011;2011:1061-4. doi: 10.1109/IEMBS.2011.6090247.
5
Vibrotactile sensory substitution for electromyographic control of object manipulation.
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2013 Aug;60(8):2226-32. doi: 10.1109/TBME.2013.2252174. Epub 2013 Mar 11.
6
Vibrotactile grasping force and hand aperture feedback for myoelectric forearm prosthesis users.
Prosthet Orthot Int. 2015 Jun;39(3):204-12. doi: 10.1177/0309364614522260. Epub 2014 Feb 24.
7
Multi-day training with vibrotactile feedback for virtual object manipulation.
IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot. 2011;2011:5975337. doi: 10.1109/ICORR.2011.5975337.
8
Real-time vibrotactile pattern generation and identification using discrete event-driven feedback.
Somatosens Mot Res. 2024 Jun;41(2):77-89. doi: 10.1080/08990220.2023.2175811. Epub 2023 Feb 7.
9
Discrete Vibro-Tactile Feedback Prevents Object Slippage in Hand Prostheses More Intuitively Than Other Modalities.
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2018 Aug;26(8):1577-1584. doi: 10.1109/TNSRE.2018.2851617. Epub 2018 Jun 29.
10
Relative to direct haptic feedback, remote vibrotactile feedback improves but slows object manipulation.
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2010;2010:2089-92. doi: 10.1109/IEMBS.2010.5626120.
引用本文的文献
1
Measuring mental workload in assistive wearable devices: a review.
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2021 Nov 7;18(1):160. doi: 10.1186/s12984-021-00953-w.
2
Grasping Embodiment: Haptic Feedback for Artificial Limbs.
Front Neurorobot. 2021 May 26;15:662397. doi: 10.3389/fnbot.2021.662397. eCollection 2021.
3
A Review of Sensory Feedback in Upper-Limb Prostheses From the Perspective of Human Motor Control.
Front Neurosci. 2020 Jun 23;14:345. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2020.00345. eCollection 2020.
4
Effects of vibrotactile feedback and grasp interface compliance on perception and control of a sensorized myoelectric hand.
PLoS One. 2019 Jan 16;14(1):e0210956. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0210956. eCollection 2019.
5
The critical stability task: quantifying sensory-motor control during ongoing movement in nonhuman primates.
J Neurophysiol. 2018 Nov 1;120(5):2164-2181. doi: 10.1152/jn.00300.2017. Epub 2018 Jun 27.
6
Neurorehabilitation in upper limb amputation: understanding how neurophysiological changes can affect functional rehabilitation.
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2017 May 22;14(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s12984-017-0256-8.
7
Effects of kinematic vibrotactile feedback on learning to control a virtual prosthetic arm.
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2015 Mar 24;12:31. doi: 10.1186/s12984-015-0025-5.
8
Combined Auditory and Vibrotactile Feedback for Human-Machine-Interface Control.
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2014 Jan;22(1):62-8. doi: 10.1109/TNSRE.2013.2273177. Epub 2013 Jul 31.
9
Augmented visual, auditory, haptic, and multimodal feedback in motor learning: a review.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2013 Feb;20(1):21-53. doi: 10.3758/s13423-012-0333-8.
本文引用的文献
1
Multi-day training with vibrotactile feedback for virtual object manipulation.
IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot. 2011;2011:5975337. doi: 10.1109/ICORR.2011.5975337.
2
Relative to direct haptic feedback, remote vibrotactile feedback improves but slows object manipulation.
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2010;2010:2089-92. doi: 10.1109/IEMBS.2010.5626120.
3
Consumer design priorities for upper limb prosthetics.
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2007 Nov;2(6):346-57. doi: 10.1080/17483100701714733.
4
Control of a six degree of freedom prosthetic arm after targeted muscle reinnervation surgery.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008 Nov;89(11):2057-65. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2008.05.016.
5
Supracutaneous vibrotactile perception threshold at various non-glabrous body loci.
Ergonomics. 2008 Jun;51(6):920-34. doi: 10.1080/00140130701809341.
6
Results of an Internet survey of myoelectric prosthetic hand users.
Prosthet Orthot Int. 2007 Dec;31(4):362-70. doi: 10.1080/03093640601061265.
7
Visual and haptic feedback contribute to tuning and online control during object manipulation.
J Mot Behav. 2007 May;39(3):179-93. doi: 10.3200/JMBR.39.3.179-193.
8
Design of a cybernetic hand for perception and action.
Biol Cybern. 2006 Dec;95(6):629-44. doi: 10.1007/s00422-006-0124-2. Epub 2006 Dec 6.
9
Time-course of vibratory adaptation and recovery in cutaneous mechanoreceptive afferents.
J Neurophysiol. 2005 Nov;94(5):3037-45. doi: 10.1152/jn.00001.2005.
10
Some neglected possibilities of communication.
Science. 1960 May 27;131(3413):1583-8. doi: 10.1126/science.131.3413.1583.
Zotero 插件