Ask not what your REB can do for you; ask what you can do for your REB.
作者信息
Upshur Ross E G
机构信息
Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto in Ontario, Canada.
出版信息
Can Fam Physician. 2011 Oct;57(10):1113-4.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Ask not what your REB can do for you; ask what you can do for your REB.不要问你的研究伦理委员会能为你做什么；要问你能为你的研究伦理委员会做什么。
Can Fam Physician. 2011 Oct;57(10):1113-4.
2
Navigating REBs.应对研究伦理审查委员会
Can Fam Physician. 2012 Feb;58(2):152-3.
3
Respect for the subject paramount.对受试者的尊重至关重要。
Can Fam Physician. 2012 Feb;58(2):153-5; author reply 155-6.
4
5
Obtaining consent for future research with induced pluripotent cells: opportunities and challenges.获取对诱导多能干细胞未来研究的同意：机遇与挑战。
PLoS Biol. 2009 Feb 24;7(2):e42. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000042.
6
Primary care provider reflections on common themes from special issue on ethical quandaries when delivering integrated primary care.基层医疗服务提供者对提供综合基层医疗时伦理困境特刊中常见主题的思考。
Fam Syst Health. 2013 Mar;31(1):49-51. doi: 10.1037/a0031868.
7
You and your EMR: the research perspective: part 3. Answering practice-level questions.你与电子病历：研究视角：第3部分。回答实践层面的问题。
Can Fam Physician. 2012 Mar;58(3):344-5.
8
Complementary medicine: implications for informed consent in general practice.补充医学：全科医疗中知情同意的意义
Br J Gen Pract. 2004 Feb;54(499):82-3.
9
'Even if they ask you to stand by a tree all day, you will have to do it (laughter)...!': community voices on the notion and practice of informed consent for biomedical research in developing countries.“即便他们要求你整天站在一棵树旁，你也得照做（笑声）……！”：发展中国家社区对生物医学研究知情同意概念与实践的看法
Soc Sci Med. 2005 Jul;61(2):443-54. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.12.003.
10
Ask first, investigate later.
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2012 Jun 26;132(12-13):1425-6. doi: 10.4045/tidsskr.12.0748.
引用本文的文献
1
Preparing ethical review systems for emergencies: next steps.为紧急情况准备伦理审查系统：下一步。
BMC Med Ethics. 2023 Oct 27;24(1):92. doi: 10.1186/s12910-023-00957-2.
2
Improving the process of research ethics review.改进研究伦理审查流程。
Res Integr Peer Rev. 2017 Aug 18;2:14. doi: 10.1186/s41073-017-0038-7. eCollection 2017.
3
Respect for the subject paramount.对受试者的尊重至关重要。
Can Fam Physician. 2012 Feb;58(2):153-5; author reply 155-6.
4
Navigating REBs.应对研究伦理审查委员会
Can Fam Physician. 2012 Feb;58(2):152-3.
5
Celebrating family medicine research.庆祝家庭医学研究。
Can Fam Physician. 2011 Oct;57(10):1111.
本文引用的文献
1
2
Attitudes toward genetic research review: results from a survey of human genetics researchers.对基因研究综述的态度：人类基因研究人员调查结果
Public Health Genomics. 2011;14(6):337-45. doi: 10.1159/000324931. Epub 2011 Apr 11.
3
Viewpoint: a method to estimate the cost in lives of ethics board review of biomedical research.观点：一种估算生物医学研究伦理委员会审查生命成本的方法。
J Intern Med. 2011 Apr;269(4):396-402. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2796.2011.02351_2.x.
4
The paradoxical problem with multiple-IRB review.多机构审查委员会审查中自相矛盾的问题。
N Engl J Med. 2010 Oct 21;363(17):1591-3. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1005101. Epub 2010 Oct 13.
5
Do IRBs protect human research participants?机构审查委员会能保护人类研究受试者吗？
JAMA. 2010 Sep 8;304(10):1122-3. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.1304.
6
Procedures for ethical review for clinical trials within the EU.欧盟境内临床试验的伦理审查程序。
BMJ. 2009 May 22;338:b1893. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b1893.
7
The dysregulation of human subjects research.人体研究的失调。
JAMA. 2007 Nov 14;298(18):2196-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.298.18.2196.
8
Time to publication for results of clinical trials.临床试验结果的发表时间。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Apr 18;2007(2):MR000011. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000011.pub2.
9
Peer review for improving the quality of grant applications.同行评审以提高资助申请质量。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Apr 18;2007(2):MR000003. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000003.pub2.
10
The ethical bureaucracy.道德官僚机构
QJM. 2003 May;96(5):323-4. doi: 10.1093/qjmed/hcg060.
Zotero 插件