Navigating REBs.
作者信息
Hardacre Gordon D
出版信息
Can Fam Physician. 2012 Feb;58(2):152-3.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Navigating REBs.应对研究伦理审查委员会
Can Fam Physician. 2012 Feb;58(2):152-3.
2
Respect for the subject paramount.对受试者的尊重至关重要。
Can Fam Physician. 2012 Feb;58(2):153-5; author reply 155-6.
3
Ask not what your REB can do for you; ask what you can do for your REB.不要问你的研究伦理委员会能为你做什么；要问你能为你的研究伦理委员会做什么。
Can Fam Physician. 2011 Oct;57(10):1113-4.
4
5
Obtaining consent for future research with induced pluripotent cells: opportunities and challenges.获取对诱导多能干细胞未来研究的同意：机遇与挑战。
PLoS Biol. 2009 Feb 24;7(2):e42. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000042.
6
Primary care provider reflections on common themes from special issue on ethical quandaries when delivering integrated primary care.基层医疗服务提供者对提供综合基层医疗时伦理困境特刊中常见主题的思考。
Fam Syst Health. 2013 Mar;31(1):49-51. doi: 10.1037/a0031868.
7
Complementary medicine: implications for informed consent in general practice.补充医学：全科医疗中知情同意的意义
Br J Gen Pract. 2004 Feb;54(499):82-3.
8
How Should Biobanking Be Governed in Low-Resource Settings?低资源环境下的生物样本库应当如何管理？
AMA J Ethics. 2020 Feb 1;22(2):E156-163. doi: 10.1001/amajethics.2020.156.
9
HIV testing and informed consent.艾滋病毒检测与知情同意。
J Med Ethics. 2005 Dec;31(12):699-700. doi: 10.1136/jme.2005.012328.
10
Challenges to informed consent.知情同意面临的挑战。
EMBO Rep. 2004 Sep;5(9):832-6. doi: 10.1038/sj.embor.7400246.
本文引用的文献
1
2
Ask not what your REB can do for you; ask what you can do for your REB.不要问你的研究伦理委员会能为你做什么；要问你能为你的研究伦理委员会做什么。
Can Fam Physician. 2011 Oct;57(10):1113-4.
3
Attitudes toward genetic research review: results from a survey of human genetics researchers.对基因研究综述的态度：人类基因研究人员调查结果
Public Health Genomics. 2011;14(6):337-45. doi: 10.1159/000324931. Epub 2011 Apr 11.
4
Do IRBs protect human research participants?机构审查委员会能保护人类研究受试者吗？
JAMA. 2010 Sep 8;304(10):1122-3. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.1304.
Zotero 插件