The William S. Middleton Memorial Veterans Hospital, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2012 Jan;112(1):48-53. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00820.2011. Epub 2011 Oct 13.
Vasoconstrictors cause contraction of pulmonary microvascular endothelial cells in culture. We wondered if this meant that contraction of these cells in situ caused active control of microvascular perfusion. If true, it would mean that pulmonary microvessels were not simply passive tubes and that control of pulmonary microvascular perfusion was not mainly due to the contraction and dilation of arterioles. To test this idea, we vasoconstricted isolated perfused rat lungs with angiotensin II, bradykinin, serotonin, or U46619 (a thromboxane analog) at concentrations that produced equal flows. We also perfused matched-flow controls. We then infused a bolus of 3 μm diameter particles into each lung and measured the rate of appearance of the particles in the venous effluent. We also measured microscopic trapping patterns of particles retained within each lung. Thirty seconds after particle infusion, venous particle concentrations were significantly lower (P ≤ 0.05) for lungs perfused with angiotensin II or bradykinin than for those perfused with U46619, but not significantly different from serotonin perfused lungs or matched flow controls. Microscopic clustering of particles retained within the lungs was significantly greater (P ≤ 0.05) for lungs perfused with angiotensin II, bradykinin, or serotonin, than for lungs perfused with U46619 or for matched flow controls. Our results suggest that these agents did not produce vasoconstriction by a common mechanism and support the idea that pulmonary microvessels possess a level of active control and are not simply passive exchange vessels.
血管收缩剂会引起培养的肺微血管内皮细胞收缩。我们想知道这是否意味着这些细胞在原位的收缩会主动控制微血管灌注。如果是这样,那就意味着肺微血管不仅仅是被动的管道,而且肺微血管灌注的控制并不主要归因于小动脉的收缩和扩张。为了验证这个想法,我们用血管紧张素 II、缓激肽、血清素或 U46619(血栓烷类似物)在产生相等流量的浓度下使分离的灌注大鼠肺收缩。我们还进行了匹配流量对照灌注。然后,我们向每个肺中注入一团 3μm 直径的颗粒,并测量颗粒在静脉流出物中的出现速度。我们还测量了每个肺中保留的颗粒的微观捕获模式。颗粒输注 30 秒后,用血管紧张素 II 或缓激肽灌注的肺静脉中颗粒浓度明显低于(P≤0.05)用 U46619 灌注的肺,但与用血清素灌注的肺或匹配的流量对照无显著差异。用血管紧张素 II、缓激肽或血清素灌注的肺中保留的颗粒微观聚集程度明显高于(P≤0.05)用 U46619 灌注的肺或匹配的流量对照。我们的结果表明,这些药物没有通过共同的机制产生血管收缩,并支持肺微血管具有一定水平的主动控制而不仅仅是被动交换血管的观点。