开放即基础设施。
Openness as infrastructure.
机构信息
VP of Science, Creative Commons, San Francisco, California, USA.
出版信息
J Cheminform. 2011 Oct 14;3(1):36. doi: 10.1186/1758-2946-3-36.
Abstract
The advent of open access to peer reviewed scholarly literature in the biomedical sciences creates the opening to examine scholarship in general, and chemistry in particular, to see where and how novel forms of network technology can accelerate the scientific method. This paper examines broad trends in information access and openness with an eye towards their applications in chemistry.
摘要
开放获取同行评议的生物医学科学学术文献的出现为我们提供了一个契机，可以用来研究一般的学术领域，特别是化学领域，以了解新型网络技术在何处以及如何加速科学方法。本文探讨了信息获取和开放的广泛趋势，着眼于它们在化学中的应用。
相似文献
1
Openness as infrastructure.开放即基础设施。
J Cheminform. 2011 Oct 14;3(1):36. doi: 10.1186/1758-2946-3-36.
2
The impact of free access to the scientific literature: a review of recent research.免费获取科学文献的影响：近期研究综述。
J Med Libr Assoc. 2011 Jul;99(3):208-17. doi: 10.3163/1536-5050.99.3.008.
3
A study of innovative features in scholarly open access journals.学术开放获取期刊的创新特征研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2011 Dec 16;13(4):e115. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1802.
4
How Do Scientists Define Openness? Exploring the Relationship Between Open Science Policies and Research Practice.科学家如何定义开放性？探索开放科学政策与研究实践之间的关系。
Bull Sci Technol Soc. 2016 Jun;36(2):128-141. doi: 10.1177/0270467616668760. Epub 2016 Jun 1.
5
Ethics of open access to biomedical research: just a special case of ethics of open access to research.生物医学研究开放获取的伦理：只是研究开放获取伦理的一个特殊情况。
Philos Ethics Humanit Med. 2007 Dec 7;2:31. doi: 10.1186/1747-5341-2-31.
6
Scientific Authors in a Changing World of Scholarly Communication: What Does the Future Hold?科学作者在不断变化的学术交流世界中：未来会怎样？
Am J Med. 2020 Jan;133(1):26-31. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2019.07.028. Epub 2019 Aug 13.
7
Co-evolution of departmental research collaboration and scholarly outcomes.部门研究合作与学术成果的共同演进。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2012 Dec;18(6):1241-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2012.01881.x. Epub 2012 Jul 9.
8
Open access to the scientific journal literature: situation 2009.开放获取科学期刊文献：2009 年状况
PLoS One. 2010 Jun 23;5(6):e11273. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0011273.
9
Exploring new frontiers of electronic publishing in biomedical science.探索生物医学科学中电子出版的新领域。
Singapore Med J. 2009 Mar;50(3):230-4.
10
Multi-stage open peer review: scientific evaluation integrating the strengths of traditional peer review with the virtues of transparency and self-regulation.多阶段公开同行评审：将传统同行评审的优势与透明度和自我监管的优点相结合的科学评估。
Front Comput Neurosci. 2012 Jul 5;6:33. doi: 10.3389/fncom.2012.00033. eCollection 2012.
引用本文的文献
1
Parallel worlds of public and commercial bioactive chemistry data.公共和商业生物活性化学数据的平行世界。
J Med Chem. 2015 Mar 12;58(5):2068-76. doi: 10.1021/jm5011308. Epub 2014 Dec 4.
2
Semantic science and its communication - a personal view.语义科学及其交流——个人观点。
J Cheminform. 2011 Oct 14;3:48. doi: 10.1186/1758-2946-3-48.
本文引用的文献
1
2
The end of peer review and traditional publishing as we know it.我们所熟知的同行评审和传统出版的终结。
Medscape J Med. 2008;10(11):267. Epub 2008 Nov 24.
3
Open-access journal will publish first, judge later.开放获取期刊将先发表，后评判。
Nature. 2007 Jan 4;445(7123):9. doi: 10.1038/445009a.
4
The SNP Consortium website: past, present and future.SNP联盟网站：过去、现在与未来。
Nucleic Acids Res. 2003 Jan 1;31(1):124-7. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkg052.
Zotero 插件