Suppr超能文献

婚姻状况对癌症生存影响随时间的变化。

Changes over time in the effect of marital status on cancer survival.

机构信息

Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, P,O, Box 1078 Blindern, 0316 Oslo, Norway.

出版信息

BMC Public Health. 2011 Oct 14;11:804. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-804.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Rates of all-cause and cause-specific mortality are higher among unmarried than married individuals. Cancer survival is also poorer in the unmarried population. Recently, some studies have found that the excess all-cause mortality of the unmarried has increased over time, and the same pattern has been shown for some specific causes of death. The objective of this study was to investigate whether there has been a similar change over time in marital status differences in cancer survival.

METHODS

Discrete-time hazard regression models for cancer deaths among more than 440,000 women and men diagnosed with cancer 1970-2007 at age 30-89 were estimated, using register data encompassing the entire Norwegian population. More than 200,000 cancer deaths during over 2 million person-years of exposure were analyzed.

RESULTS

The excess mortality of the never-married compared to the married has increased steadily for men, in particular the elderly. Among elderly women, the excess mortality of the never-married compared to the married has increased, and there are indications of an increasing excess mortality of the widowed. The excess mortality of divorced men and women, however, has been stable.

CONCLUSIONS

There is no obvious explanation for the increasing disadvantage among the never-married. It could be due to a relatively poorer general health at time of diagnosis, either because of a more protective effect of partnership in a society that may have become less cohesive or because of more positive selection into marriage. Alternatively, it could be related to increasing differentials with respect to treatment. Today's complex cancer therapy regimens may be more difficult for never-married to follow, and health care interventions directed and adapted more specifically to the broad subgroup of never-married patients might be warranted.

摘要

背景

与已婚人士相比,未婚人士的全因死亡率和特定原因死亡率更高。未婚人群的癌症存活率也较差。最近,一些研究发现,未婚人群的全因死亡率一直在上升,某些特定死因也呈现出同样的模式。本研究旨在调查在癌症存活率方面,婚姻状况差异是否随时间发生了类似的变化。

方法

利用 1970 年至 2007 年间年龄在 30-89 岁之间被诊断患有癌症的 44 万多名男性和女性的登记数据,使用离散时间风险回归模型估计了癌症死亡人数。在超过 200 万人年的暴露时间内,分析了超过 20 万例癌症死亡人数。

结果

与已婚者相比,男性中从未结婚者的超额死亡率一直在稳步上升,尤其是老年人。在老年女性中,从未结婚者的超额死亡率一直在增加,而且丧偶者的超额死亡率也有增加的迹象。然而,离婚男性和女性的超额死亡率一直保持稳定。

结论

从未结婚者的劣势不断增加,目前还没有明显的解释。这可能是由于在诊断时相对较差的一般健康状况,要么是因为在一个凝聚力可能较低的社会中,伴侣关系的保护作用更强,要么是因为更积极地选择结婚。或者,这可能与治疗方面的差异有关。如今复杂的癌症治疗方案可能对未婚者来说更难以遵循,针对广泛的未婚患者群体,有必要进行有针对性和适应性更强的医疗干预。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0787/3206482/c10ae279bb0b/1471-2458-11-804-1.jpg

相似文献

1
Changes over time in the effect of marital status on cancer survival.
BMC Public Health. 2011 Oct 14;11:804. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-804.
2
Trends in total and cause-specific mortality by marital status among elderly Norwegian men and women.
BMC Public Health. 2011 Jul 6;11:537. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-537.
3
Excess mortality for the unmarried in rural Bangladesh.
Int J Epidemiol. 1993 Jun;22(3):445-56. doi: 10.1093/ije/22.3.445.
4
The impact of marital status on cancer survival.
Soc Sci Med. 2001 Feb;52(3):357-68. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(00)00139-8.
5
The poorer cancer survival among the unmarried in Norway: is much explained by comorbidities?
Soc Sci Med. 2013 Mar;81:42-52. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.01.012. Epub 2013 Jan 21.
6
Marital status: a gender-independent risk factor for poorer survival after radical cystectomy.
BJU Int. 2012 Nov;110(9):1301-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.10993.x. Epub 2012 Mar 27.
7
Suicide and marital status in Italy.
Psychiatr Q. 2008 Dec;79(4):275-85. doi: 10.1007/s11126-008-9072-4. Epub 2008 Jul 4.
8
Marital history, health and mortality among older men and women in England and Wales.
BMC Public Health. 2010 Sep 15;10:554. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-10-554.
10
Marital Status and Outcomes in Patients With Cardiovascular Disease.
J Am Heart Assoc. 2017 Dec 20;6(12):e005890. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.117.005890.

引用本文的文献

1
Social determinants of health, health behaviors, and general health among colorectal cancer survivors: A cross-sectional study.
PLoS One. 2025 Aug 12;20(8):e0329752. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0329752. eCollection 2025.
3
Global epidemiology of breast cancer based on risk factors: a systematic review.
Front Oncol. 2023 Oct 10;13:1240098. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1240098. eCollection 2023.
4
Social and racial inequalities in diabetes and cancer in the United States.
Front Public Health. 2023 Jul 19;11:1178979. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1178979. eCollection 2023.
5
Comprehensive clinical analysis of patients with primary malignant tumor of pituitary gland: A population-based study.
Front Surg. 2022 Oct 18;9:933168. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.933168. eCollection 2022.
6
Are there differences in outcomes by race among women with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer?
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2022 Nov;196(2):399-408. doi: 10.1007/s10549-022-06736-8. Epub 2022 Sep 24.
7
The Effect of Dietary Methyl-Donor Intake and Other Lifestyle Factors on Cancer Patients in Hungary.
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Sep 13;14(18):4432. doi: 10.3390/cancers14184432.
8
A Population-Based Systematic Clinical Analysis With a Single-Center Case Series of Patients With Pulmonary Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma.
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2021 Dec 3;12:759915. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2021.759915. eCollection 2021.
9
Needs and Self-Care Efficacy for Cancer Patients Suffering from Side Effects of Chemotherapy.
J Oncol. 2021 Apr 24;2021:8880366. doi: 10.1155/2021/8880366. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
Social inequalities in cancer survival.
Popul Stud (Camb). 2000 Jan;54(1):1-18. doi: 10.1080/713779066.
2
Trends in total and cause-specific mortality by marital status among elderly Norwegian men and women.
BMC Public Health. 2011 Jul 6;11:537. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-537.
3
Adverse prognostic factors for testicular cancer-specific survival: a population-based study of 27,948 patients.
J Clin Oncol. 2011 Mar 10;29(8):963-70. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2010.32.3204. Epub 2011 Feb 7.
4
Prostate cancer screening and informed decision-making: provider and patient perspectives.
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2011 Jun;14(2):155-61. doi: 10.1038/pcan.2010.55. Epub 2011 Jan 18.
5
Stress and health: major findings and policy implications.
J Health Soc Behav. 2010;51 Suppl:S41-53. doi: 10.1177/0022146510383499.
6
Marital history 1971-91 and mortality 1991-2004 in England & Wales and Finland.
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2012 Jan;66(1):30-6. doi: 10.1136/jech.2010.110635. Epub 2010 Oct 5.
7
Loneliness matters: a theoretical and empirical review of consequences and mechanisms.
Ann Behav Med. 2010 Oct;40(2):218-27. doi: 10.1007/s12160-010-9210-8.
8
Predictors of PSA Screening Among Men Over 40 Years of Age Who Had Ever Heard about PSA.
Korean J Urol. 2010 Jun;51(6):391-7. doi: 10.4111/kju.2010.51.6.391. Epub 2010 Jun 21.
9
Social capital, economic conditions, marital status and daily smoking: a population-based study.
Public Health. 2010 Feb;124(2):71-7. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2010.01.003. Epub 2010 Feb 23.
10
Marital status, social capital, material conditions and self-rated health: a population-based study.
Health Policy. 2009 Dec;93(2-3):172-9. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2009.05.010. Epub 2009 Aug 18.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验