Djukanović R, Roche W R, Wilson J W, Beasley C R, Twentyman O P, Howarth R H, Holgate S T
Department of Pathology, Southampton University General Hospital, United Kingdom.
Am Rev Respir Dis. 1990 Aug;142(2):434-57. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm/142.2.434.
Over the past decade, it has become increasingly recognized that airways inflammation is one of the major components of asthma. Until recently, measurements of bronchial responsiveness and mediators of allergic reactions were the only methods of studying pathogenetic mechanisms in asthma. With improved diagnostic procedures such as fiberoptic bronchoscopy, it has become possible to investigate these mechanisms and the resulting inflammatory changes in situ. BAL has highlighted the presence of mast cells and eosinophils and has given proof of their mediator participation in airways inflammation and hyperresponsiveness. Endobronchial biopsies have so far yielded results that are similar to those obtained from postmortem studies, although it appears that there are varying degrees of inflammation in living asthmatics. Even in mild disease, the histopathologic features of bronchial asthma are consistent with chronic inflammation. Indirect evidence obtained from allergen challenge leading to increased bronchial hyperresponsiveness during LAR, and direct evidence of inflammatory cells and their mediators in the airway mucosa and lumen after allergen challenge argue for an active role of cells in bringing about inflammatory changes. At present, however, it is not possible to relate precisely the findings obtained by bronchoscopy to the clinical presentation and progression of asthma. Cell activation with production of potent mediators of inflammation may be more relevant to inflammation than the simple presence of these cells in the airways. Almost all the inflammatory cells present in the bronchial wall and lumen have been implicated in the pathogenesis of mucosal inflammation in asthma, but with our current state of knowledge, none can be singled out as the most important contributor. The mast cell was the first to be investigated in depth, and despite the accumulation of large amounts of data concerning its ultrastructure and function, it remains uncertain to what extent this cell is involved in inflammatory responses. Thus, while its main role appears to be that of initiator of allergen-induced responses, the eosinophil has attracted more attention as a proinflammatory cell rather than as an antiinflammatory cell with a capacity to be selectively recruited from the circulation in response to IgE-dependent signals. The eosinophil secretes potent mediators that cause damage to the bronchial epithelium and lead to bronchoconstriction. The role of other cells is at present not as well defined.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
在过去十年中,人们越来越认识到气道炎症是哮喘的主要组成部分之一。直到最近,支气管反应性测量和过敏反应介质检测仍是研究哮喘发病机制的唯一方法。随着纤维支气管镜等诊断程序的改进,现在有可能在原位研究这些机制以及由此产生的炎症变化。支气管肺泡灌洗(BAL)突出了肥大细胞和嗜酸性粒细胞的存在,并证明了它们的介质参与气道炎症和高反应性。到目前为止,支气管活检的结果与尸检研究的结果相似,尽管在活体哮喘患者中似乎存在不同程度的炎症。即使在轻度疾病中,支气管哮喘的组织病理学特征也与慢性炎症一致。从变应原激发导致迟发相反应(LAR)期间支气管高反应性增加获得的间接证据,以及变应原激发后气道黏膜和管腔内炎症细胞及其介质的直接证据,都表明细胞在引起炎症变化中起积极作用。然而,目前还无法将支气管镜检查的结果与哮喘的临床表现和病程精确关联起来。细胞激活并产生强效炎症介质可能比这些细胞单纯存在于气道中与炎症的关系更为密切。几乎所有存在于支气管壁和管腔内的炎症细胞都与哮喘黏膜炎症的发病机制有关,但就我们目前的知识水平而言,没有一种细胞能被确定为最重要的促成因素。肥大细胞是第一个被深入研究的细胞,尽管积累了大量关于其超微结构和功能的数据,但该细胞在炎症反应中的参与程度仍不确定。因此,虽然其主要作用似乎是变应原诱导反应的启动者,但嗜酸性粒细胞作为促炎细胞而非具有响应IgE依赖信号从循环中选择性募集能力的抗炎细胞,已引起更多关注。嗜酸性粒细胞分泌强效介质,导致支气管上皮损伤并引起支气管收缩。目前其他细胞的作用尚不明确。(摘要截断于400字)