Suppr超能文献

β受体阻滞剂、钙通道阻滞剂和转换酶抑制剂在高血压黑人患者中的疗效与安全性比较。

A comparison of the efficacy and safety of a beta-blocker, a calcium channel blocker, and a converting enzyme inhibitor in hypertensive blacks.

作者信息

Saunders E, Weir M R, Kong B W, Hollifield J, Gray J, Vertes V, Sowers J R, Zemel M B, Curry C, Schoenberger J

机构信息

Department of Medicine, University of Maryland Hospital, Baltimore.

出版信息

Arch Intern Med. 1990 Aug;150(8):1707-13.

PMID:2200382
Abstract

A double-blind, positively controlled, forced dose titration study comparing the efficacy and safety of atenolol, captopril, and verapamil sustained release as single agents in the treatment of black patients with mild to moderate hypertension (diastolic blood pressure, 95 to 114 mm Hg) was conducted. A total of 394 patients were randomized to one of the three therapies. Mean blood pressures during a 2- to 4-week placebo treatment period (baseline) ranged from 100.4 to 100.7 mm Hg diastolic and 151.7 to 152.5 mm Hg systolic for the three groups. Of the patients, 355 (of whom 345 had assessable data) completed the first treatment period, which consisted of therapy with either 50 mg/d of atenolol, 25 mg every 12 hours of captopril, or 240 mg/d of verapamil sustained release. During the second 4-week treatment period, which 319 patients completed (307 assessable), half of the patients had their antihypertensive medication increased and the other half continued the same dose. Goal blood pressure was defined as a supine diastolic pressure of less than 90 mm Hg or a 10-mm Hg or greater drop in supine diastolic blood pressure from pretreatment levels. Atenolol, captopril, and verapamil sustained release therapy was associated with goal blood pressure achievement during the first treatment period 55.1%, 43.8%, and 65.2% of the time, respectively, and during the second treatment period 59.6%, 57.1%, and 73.0% of the time. Side effects were minimal and comparable for all three drugs.

摘要

开展了一项双盲、阳性对照、强制剂量滴定研究,比较阿替洛尔、卡托普利和缓释维拉帕米作为单一药物治疗轻度至中度高血压(舒张压95至114毫米汞柱)黑人患者的疗效和安全性。共有394例患者被随机分配至三种治疗方法之一。三组患者在2至4周安慰剂治疗期(基线)的平均舒张压为100.4至100.7毫米汞柱,平均收缩压为151.7至152.5毫米汞柱。355例患者(其中345例有可评估数据)完成了第一个治疗期,该期治疗药物为每日50毫克阿替洛尔、每12小时25毫克卡托普利或每日240毫克缓释维拉帕米。在第二个4周治疗期,319例患者完成治疗(307例可评估),一半患者增加了抗高血压药物剂量,另一半患者继续使用相同剂量。目标血压定义为仰卧位舒张压低于90毫米汞柱或仰卧位舒张压较治疗前水平下降10毫米汞柱或更多。在第一个治疗期,阿替洛尔、卡托普利和缓释维拉帕米治疗分别有55.1%、43.8%和65.2%的时间达到目标血压;在第二个治疗期,分别有59.6%、57.1%和73.0%的时间达到目标血压。三种药物的副作用均极小且相当。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验