• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

关于心理学家参与药理学问题的实践指南。

Practice guidelines regarding psychologists' involvement in pharmacological issues.

出版信息

Am Psychol. 2011 Dec;66(9):835-49. doi: 10.1037/a0025890. Epub 2011 Oct 17.

DOI:10.1037/a0025890
PMID:22004178
Abstract

The guidelines presented in this document are intended to provide a resource to psychologists interested in the issue of what represents optimal practice in relation to pharmacotherapy. They are not intended to apply to those psychologists who choose not to become directly or indirectly involved in medication management regardless of their level of competency. Some of the guidelines presented in this document are targeted specifically to the population of psychologists with prescriptive authority. Others are considered relevant in any case where the psychologist is actively involved in decision making, whether as a prescriber or collaborator. Still others are considered applicable any time a psychologist is involved in the practice of pharmacotherapy, whether as a prescriber, collaborator, or information provider. Given the unique elements of the population of psychologists who can prescribe on the one hand, and the frequency with which psychologists participate in collaborative and information-providing activities on the other, it was considered important to provide guidelines appropriate to each set of activities. However, it is also important to recognize that a principle of optimal practice may have different implications in the context of active participation versus providing information. In particular, the distinction between active participation and providing information can often be blurred in the practice setting, with a psychologist often playing different roles at different points in the treatment. Given the ambiguity that surrounds these activities, it is urged that these guidelines be read with the understanding that the clearest practice delineation occurs between those psychologists who possess prescriptive authority and those who do not, and that psychologists who do not possess prescriptive authority use critical judgment in determining which guidelines best inform their practice.

摘要

本文件中提出的准则旨在为对药物治疗相关的最佳实践问题感兴趣的心理学家提供资源。它们并不适用于那些选择不直接或间接参与药物管理的心理学家,无论其能力水平如何。本文件中提出的一些准则专门针对具有处方权的心理学家群体。其他准则则被认为在心理学家积极参与决策的任何情况下都相关,无论是作为处方者还是合作者。还有一些准则被认为在心理学家参与药物治疗实践的任何时候都适用,无论是作为处方者、合作者还是信息提供者。鉴于一方面可以开处方的心理学家群体的独特性,以及另一方面心理学家参与合作和提供信息活动的频率,认为提供适合每一组活动的准则非常重要。然而,同样重要的是要认识到,最佳实践原则在积极参与与提供信息的背景下可能有不同的含义。特别是,在实践环境中,积极参与和提供信息之间的区别往往很模糊,心理学家在治疗的不同阶段常常扮演不同的角色。考虑到这些活动周围的模糊性,强烈建议在阅读这些准则时要明白,最明确的实践划分是在那些具有处方权的心理学家和那些没有处方权的心理学家之间,并且没有处方权的心理学家在确定哪些准则最能为他们的实践提供信息时要运用批判性判断。

相似文献

1
Practice guidelines regarding psychologists' involvement in pharmacological issues.关于心理学家参与药理学问题的实践指南。
Am Psychol. 2011 Dec;66(9):835-49. doi: 10.1037/a0025890. Epub 2011 Oct 17.
2
The 2002 psychologist prescribing law in New Mexico: the psychiatrists' perspective.2002年新墨西哥州心理学家开处方法律:精神科医生的观点。
Md Med. 2002 Fall;3(4):21-3, 45.
3
The 2002 psychologist prescribing law in New Mexico: the psychologists' perspective.2002年新墨西哥州心理学家开处方法律:心理学家的视角。
Md Med. 2002 Fall;3(4):24-5, 35.
4
An ethical dilemma: clinical psychologists prescribing psychotropic medications.一个伦理困境:临床心理学家开具精神药物处方。
Issues Ment Health Nurs. 2002 Jan-Feb;23(1):17-29. doi: 10.1080/01612840252825455.
5
Responding to society's needs: prescription privileges for psychologists.回应社会需求:心理学家的处方权。
J Clin Psychol. 2002 Jun;58(6):599-610. doi: 10.1002/jclp.10057.
6
Prescriptive authority in the face of research revelations.
Am Psychol. 2010 Feb-Mar;65(2):136-7; discussion 137-8. doi: 10.1037/a0018051.
7
Just say no to psychotropic drugs!对精神药物坚决说“不”!
J Clin Psychol. 2002 Jun;58(6):635-48. doi: 10.1002/jclp.10049.
8
Prescriptive authority for psychologists.心理学家的规定权限。
Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2010;6:21-47. doi: 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-090209-151448.
9
The psychologist's role in the collaborative process of psychopharmacology.心理学家在精神药理学协作过程中的作用。
J Clin Psychol. 2002 Jun;58(6):617-21. doi: 10.1002/jclp.10058.
10
Should psychologists be granted prescription privileges? A review of the prescription privilege debate for psychiatrists.心理学家应该被授予处方权吗?对精神科医生处方权辩论的综述。
Can J Psychiatry. 2002 Jun;47(5):443-9. doi: 10.1177/070674370204700505.