School of Psychology, Fairleigh Dickinson University, Teaneck, New Jersey 07666, USA.
Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2010;6:21-47. doi: 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-090209-151448.
The proposal that psychologists should pursue prescriptive authority was first put forth 25 years ago, and it has been an official goal of the American Psychological Association for 15 years. Since then some form of prescriptive authority has been approved by three states, the Territory of Guam, and three branches of the military. Psychologists are also eligible to prescribe in the Public Health Service and the Indian Health Service. The movement has generated strong opinions both in favor and in opposition. Supporters focus particularly on increasing access to appropriate care and changing the role of psychologists within the healthcare system, while opponents raise concerns about how prescriptive authority will change professional psychology and whether psychologists will prescribe safely. This review provides a summary of milestones in the movement to date, as well as the arguments that have been raised for and against prescriptive authority.
建议心理学家应追求规定性权威,这一观点早在 25 年前就已提出,而美国心理协会也将其作为 15 年来的正式目标。自此,有三种形式的规定性权威已获得三个州、关岛地区以及三军的认可。心理学家也有资格在公共卫生署和印第安人健康服务署开处方。这一运动引起了强烈的正反两方面意见。支持者特别关注增加获得适当护理的机会,以及改变心理学家在医疗体系中的角色,而反对者则担心规定性权威将如何改变专业心理学,以及心理学家是否能够安全地开处方。本文综述了迄今为止该运动的里程碑事件,以及支持和反对规定性权威的论点。