National Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Øster Farimagsgade 5A, DK-1353 Copenhagen K, Denmark.
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2011 Oct;27(4):324-9. doi: 10.1017/S0266462311000511.
Health systems are placing more and more emphasis on designing and delivering services that are focused on the patient, and there is a growing interest in patient aspects of health policy research and health technology assessment (HTA). Only a few HTA agencies use and invest in scientific methods to generate knowledge and evidence about the patient aspects of a given technology. This raises questions about how knowledge is produced in HTA reports and what kind of knowledge is considered relevant. This article uses a Danish HTA on patient education from 2009 as empirical material for a critical examination and discussion of knowledge and knowledge production about the patient aspects of HTA.
卫生系统越来越重视设计和提供以患者为中心的服务，人们对卫生政策研究和卫生技术评估（HTA）中的患者方面越来越感兴趣。只有少数 HTA 机构使用和投资于科学方法来生成有关特定技术的患者方面的知识和证据。这就提出了关于在 HTA 报告中如何产生知识以及考虑哪些知识相关的问题。本文使用 2009 年丹麦关于患者教育的 HTA 作为实证材料，对 HTA 中患者方面的知识和知识生产进行批判性的审查和讨论。
