Alberta Agriculture and Rural Development, Agriculture Centre, 5401 First Avenue South, Lethbridge, Alberta, Canada.
J Food Prot. 2011 Oct;74(10):1605-10. doi: 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-11-154.
Effects of cattle transportation on hide contamination with Escherichia coli O157 have been variable, and the present study was designed to clarify relationships among duration of transport, microclimate, and environment within the trailer and contamination of hides with E. coli O157. Crossbred Angus heifers from a feedlot in southern Alberta were sorted into 10 replicate loads containing 45 animals (short haul, 621.5 ± 2.1 kg of body weight) or 46 animals (long haul, 576.0 ± 1.7 kg of body weight). Long-haul trips (n = 5) were made in July and August to slaughter plant A, whereas short-haul trips (n = 5) were made in October to slaughter plant B. The same trailer unit and driver were used for all loads. Data loggers were located in the ceiling of each compartment of the trailers to record ambient temperature and relative humidity. Each heifer was swabbed on the perineum on-farm prior to loading and immediately after stunning at the slaughter plant (an average 12-h transport for long haul and 1-h transport for short haul). Swabs were transported on ice before immunomagnetic separation for detection of E. coli O157. Transportation did not affect prevalence of hide contamination with E. coli O157, although 80% of long-haul swabs were positive on-farm compared with 26% of short-haul swabs, due to seasonality of shedding E. coli O157. Cattle transported in the nose compartment had fewer positive hide swabs (P < 0.05) than cattle in the deck or belly compartments during long-haul trips, even though the nose had a higher (P < 0.05) temperature-humidity index than the other compartments. Prevalence of hide contamination varied widely among loads even when the organism was at seasonally low levels. This suggests that the feedlot pen has a greater effect on hide contamination at the slaughter plant than transportation factors including temperature-humidity index, loading density, and duration of transport.
牛只运输对牛皮大肠杆菌 O157 污染的影响各不相同,本研究旨在阐明运输时间、拖车内部微气候和环境与牛皮大肠杆菌 O157 污染之间的关系。来自艾伯塔省南部一个饲料场的杂交安格斯小公牛被分为 10 个重复批次,每个批次含有 45 头动物(短途运输,体重 621.5 ± 2.1 公斤)或 46 头动物(长途运输,体重 576.0 ± 1.7 公斤)。长途运输(n = 5)于 7 月和 8 月运往屠宰场 A,而短途运输(n = 5)于 10 月运往屠宰场 B。所有批次均使用相同的拖车单元和驾驶员。数据记录仪位于拖车每个隔间的天花板上,以记录环境温度和相对湿度。每头小公牛在装载前和在屠宰场被电击晕后立即在会阴部进行拭子取样(长途运输平均运输 12 小时,短途运输 1 小时)。拭子在免疫磁分离检测大肠杆菌 O157 之前在冰上运输。尽管长途运输的 80%的拭子在农场呈阳性,而短途运输的 26%的拭子呈阳性,但运输并未影响牛皮大肠杆菌 O157 的污染率,这是由于大肠杆菌 O157 的脱落具有季节性。在长途运输中,与甲板或腹部隔间相比,鼻子隔间的牛只的阳性拭子数量较少(P < 0.05),尽管鼻子的温湿度指数比其他隔间高(P < 0.05)。即使在季节低水平时,负载之间的隐藏污染率也差异很大。这表明与运输因素(包括温度-湿度指数、装载密度和运输时间)相比,屠宰场的牛栏对牛皮污染的影响更大。