Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy, Tufts University, 150 Harrison Ave, Boston, MA 02111, USA.
Prev Chronic Dis. 2011 Nov;8(6):A150. Epub 2011 Oct 17.
To build on a growing interest in community-based obesity prevention programs, methods are needed for matching intervention strategies to local needs and assets. We used the Community Readiness Model (CRM), a structured interview guide and scoring system, to assess community readiness to act on childhood obesity prevention, furthering a replication study of a successful intervention. Using the CRM protocol, we conducted interviews with 4 stakeholders in each of 10 communities of similar size, socioeconomic status, and perceived readiness to implement a community-wide obesity prevention intervention. Communities were in California, Florida, Illinois, Massachusetts, New York, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, and Tennessee. The 4 stakeholders were the mayor or city manager, the school superintendent, the school food service director, and a community coalition representative. Interviews were recorded and professionally transcribed. Pairs of trained reviewers scored the transcriptions according to CRM protocol. The CRM assesses 9 stages of readiness for 6 dimensions: existing community efforts to prevent childhood obesity, community knowledge about the efforts, leadership, community climate, knowledge about the issue, and resources. We calculated an overall readiness score for each community from the dimension scores. Overall readiness scores ranged from 2.97 to 5.36 on the 9-point scale. The mean readiness score, 4.28 (SD, 0.68), corresponds with a "preplanning" level of readiness. Of the 6 dimensions, community climate varied the least (mean score, 3.11; SD, 0.64); leadership varied the most (mean score, 4.79; SD, 1.13). The CRM quantified a subjective concept, allowing for comparison among 10 communities. Dimension scores and qualitative data from interviews helped in the selection of 6 communities for a replication study.
为了进一步推动社区为基础的肥胖预防项目的发展,我们需要找到一种方法,使干预策略与当地的需求和资源相匹配。我们使用社区准备度模型(CRM),这是一种结构化的访谈指南和评分系统,来评估社区在儿童肥胖预防方面的准备程度,以进一步复制一项成功干预措施的研究。使用 CRM 协议,我们对 10 个规模、社会经济地位和实施社区范围肥胖预防干预措施的准备程度相似的社区中的每个社区的 4 名利益相关者进行了访谈。这些社区位于加利福尼亚州、佛罗里达州、伊利诺伊州、马萨诸塞州、纽约州、北卡罗来纳州、宾夕法尼亚州和田纳西州。这 4 名利益相关者分别是市长或城市经理、学校总监、学校餐饮服务主任和社区联盟代表。访谈进行了录音,并由专业人员进行了转录。经过培训的两位评审员根据 CRM 协议对转录本进行了评分。CRM 评估了 6 个维度的 9 个准备阶段:预防儿童肥胖的现有社区努力、社区对这些努力的了解、领导力、社区氛围、对问题的了解和资源。我们根据维度得分计算了每个社区的整体准备得分。在 9 分制上,社区的整体准备得分范围从 2.97 到 5.36。平均值为 4.28(标准差为 0.68),对应于“计划前”准备水平。在 6 个维度中,社区氛围变化最小(平均得分为 3.11;标准差为 0.64);领导力变化最大(平均得分为 4.79;标准差为 1.13)。CRM 量化了一个主观概念,使 10 个社区之间的比较成为可能。维度得分和访谈中的定性数据有助于选择 6 个社区进行复制研究。