Iskandar A, Nepper-Rasmussen J
Department of Radiology, Odense University Hospital; Odense C, Denmark.
Interv Neuroradiol. 2011 Sep;17(3):299-305. doi: 10.1177/159101991101700304. Epub 2011 Oct 17.
The endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms 3 mm or less is considered controversial. The purpose of this study is to report angiographic and clinical results following coiling of such aneurysms and compare them to those of larger aneurysms (> 3 mm).Between November 1999 and November 2009 endovascular treatment was attempted in 956 consecutive intracranial aneurysms. Of 956 aneurysms, 111 aneurysms were very small aneurysms with a maximal diameter of 3 mm or less. We conducted a retrospective analysis of angiographic and clinical outcome following coiling of very small aneurysms and subsequently comparing it to the results of larger aneurysms.Coiling initially failed in eight aneurysms. In the remaining 103 aneurysms endovascular treatment was accomplished and immediate angiographic results showed complete aneurysm occlusion in 43 aneurysms, nearly complete aneurysm occlusion in 54 aneurysms and less than 90% aneurysm occlusion in six aneurysms. Complications occurred in the treatment of 15 aneurysms, including eight procedural ruptures, six thromboembolic events and one case of early hemorrhage. Compared with larger aneurysms, treatment of very small aneurysms was associated with a higher rate of procedural ruptures (7.2% versus 4.4%) and procedural mortality (4.7% versus 2.7%) but a lower procedural morbidity (1.9% versus 4.0%). However none of these differences reached statistical significance (p = 0.186, p= 0.388, respectively). The retreatment rate was higher for the larger aneurysms (8.2% and 6.3%), but this was not significant either (p= 0. 496). At nine-month follow-up significantly more small aneurysms were found to have a stable occlusion grade compared to large aneurysms.Endovascular treatment of very small aneurysms is feasible with a lower retreatment rate compared to large aneurysms (> 3 mm). However the data also suggest that endovascular treatment of very small aneurysms might be associated with an increased risk of procedural ruptures and mortality. At nine-month follow-up results indicate significantly less compaction in the very small aneurysms.
颅内动脉瘤直径3毫米及以下的血管内治疗存在争议。本研究旨在报告此类动脉瘤栓塞后的血管造影和临床结果,并与较大动脉瘤(>3毫米)的结果进行比较。1999年11月至2009年11月,对956例连续性颅内动脉瘤尝试进行血管内治疗。在这956例动脉瘤中,111例为最大直径3毫米及以下的极小动脉瘤。我们对极小动脉瘤栓塞后的血管造影和临床结果进行了回顾性分析,并随后将其与较大动脉瘤的结果进行比较。最初有8例动脉瘤栓塞失败。在其余103例动脉瘤中完成了血管内治疗,即刻血管造影结果显示43例动脉瘤完全闭塞,54例动脉瘤接近完全闭塞,6例动脉瘤闭塞率低于90%。15例动脉瘤治疗中出现并发症,包括8例术中破裂、6例血栓栓塞事件和1例早期出血。与较大动脉瘤相比,极小动脉瘤治疗的术中破裂率(7.2%对4.4%)和手术死亡率(4.7%对2.7%)较高,但术中发病率较低(1.9%对4.0%)。然而,这些差异均未达到统计学意义(p分别为0.186、0.388)。较大动脉瘤的再治疗率较高(8.2%和6.3%),但这也无统计学意义(p = 0.496)。在9个月随访时,与较大动脉瘤相比,发现显著更多的小动脉瘤闭塞分级稳定。与较大动脉瘤(>3毫米)相比,极小动脉瘤的血管内治疗可行且再治疗率较低。然而,数据也表明,极小动脉瘤的血管内治疗可能与术中破裂和死亡风险增加有关。在9个月随访时,结果表明极小动脉瘤的致密化明显较少。