Dediu M
Department of Medical Oncology, Institute of Oncology Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania.
J BUON. 2011 Jul-Sep;16(3):431-3.
The majority of patients with non-small cell lung (NSCLC) present with advanced, metastatic disease at the time of diagnosis. The current state of the art for the management of this condition is first- and second-line chemotherapy (CT), along with appropriate supporting care measures, which are supposed to alleviate symptoms and to improve survival. During the last years, maintenance therapy (MT) was included in the therapeutic algorithm for these patients. MT could be defined as continuation of an active treatment until disease progression in patients who demonstrated a non-progressing status following induction chemotherapy. Despite the results of several randomized trials showing a significant benefit by using this approach, the strategy is far from being universally accepted. The internationally recognized guidelines provide different recommendation when it comes to this topic, while some major drawbacks in the design of the positive clinical trials may have distorted the relevance of the communicated data. This paper aimed to review the most contentious aspects which should be considered while contemplating the use of MT in the daily clinical practice.
大多数非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者在确诊时已处于晚期转移性疾病状态。目前针对这种情况的最佳治疗方法是一线和二线化疗(CT),以及适当的支持性护理措施,这些措施旨在缓解症状并提高生存率。在过去几年中,维持治疗(MT)已被纳入这些患者的治疗方案中。MT可定义为在诱导化疗后病情无进展的患者中继续进行积极治疗直至疾病进展。尽管多项随机试验结果显示使用这种方法有显著益处,但该策略远未被普遍接受。国际公认的指南在这个问题上提供了不同的建议,而阳性临床试验设计中的一些主要缺陷可能扭曲了所传达数据的相关性。本文旨在回顾在日常临床实践中考虑使用MT时应考虑的最具争议性的方面。