• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

三联药物组合预防异基因造血干细胞移植前白消安加环磷酰胺化疗后恶心和呕吐

Triple drug combination in the prevention of nausea and vomiting following busulfan plus cyclophosphamide chemotherapy before allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

作者信息

Pielichowski W, Gawronski K, Mlot B, Oborska S, Wasko-Grabowska A, Rzepecki P

机构信息

Military Institute of Medicine, Oncology Department, Warsaw, Poland.

出版信息

J BUON. 2011 Jul-Sep;16(3):541-6.

PMID:22006763
Abstract

PURPOSE

A clinical study of triple drug combination (aprepitant+palonosetron+ dexamethasone) was carried out to evaluate its efficacy in preventing both acute and delayed emesis after high-dose chemotherapy (HDC) with busulphan+cyclophosphamide (BuCy) before hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT).

METHODS

The study enrolled 60 patients suffering from various hematological malignancies: 20 in the triple drug antiemetic group and 20 in each of two historical control groups that received dexamethasone plus either ondansetron or palonosetron. The groups were comparable for statistical analysis. The observation period started with the initiation of chemotherapy (0 h) and continued for 24 h after its completion for the acute phase, and during 5 days after finishing chemotherapy for the delayed phase. The response rate of the study drugs was evaluated by a 4-grade scale based on the condition of nausea and vomiting: highly, moderately or slightly effective and not effective.

RESULTS

Patients treated with the triple drug combination had significantly higher response rates than those receiving palonosetron or ondansetron (+ dexamethasone) during both the acute and delayed phases: highly effective in early + late phases: 55 vs. 30 vs. 20%; highly effective in early phase: 70 vs. 30 vs. 20%; highly effective in late phase: 55 vs. 55 vs. 30%; highly + moderately effective in early phase: 75 vs. 32 vs. 25%; highly + moderately effective in late phase: 85 vs. 60 vs. 40% for triple drug combination, palonosetron + dexamethasone and ondansetron + dexamethasone, respectively.

CONCLUSION

This triple drug combination was more effective than ondansetron or palonosetron (+ dexamethasone) in preventing acute (especially), and delayed nausea and vomiting following BuCy chemotherapy before HSCT.

摘要

目的

开展一项关于三联药物组合(阿瑞匹坦+帕洛诺司琼+地塞米松)的临床研究,以评估其在造血干细胞移植(HSCT)前使用白消安+环磷酰胺(BuCy)进行大剂量化疗(HDC)后预防急性和迟发性呕吐的疗效。

方法

该研究纳入了60例患有各种血液系统恶性肿瘤的患者:20例在三联药物止吐组,另外20例分别在两个历史对照组,这两个对照组接受地塞米松加昂丹司琼或帕洛诺司琼。这些组在统计学分析方面具有可比性。观察期从化疗开始(0小时)起,急性期在化疗结束后持续24小时,延迟期在化疗结束后持续5天。根据恶心和呕吐情况,通过4级量表评估研究药物的有效率:高度有效、中度有效、轻度有效和无效。

结果

在急性和延迟期,接受三联药物组合治疗的患者的有效率显著高于接受帕洛诺司琼或昂丹司琼(+地塞米松)治疗的患者:在早期+晚期高度有效:分别为55%、30%和20%;在早期高度有效:分别为70%、30%和20%;在晚期高度有效:分别为55%、55%和30%;在早期高度+中度有效:分别为75%、32%和25%;在晚期高度+中度有效:分别为85%、60%和40%,分别对应三联药物组合、帕洛诺司琼+地塞米松和昂丹司琼+地塞米松组。

结论

在预防HSCT前BuCy化疗后的急性(尤其是)和迟发性恶心和呕吐方面,这种三联药物组合比昂丹司琼或帕洛诺司琼(+地塞米松)更有效。

相似文献

1
Triple drug combination in the prevention of nausea and vomiting following busulfan plus cyclophosphamide chemotherapy before allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.三联药物组合预防异基因造血干细胞移植前白消安加环磷酰胺化疗后恶心和呕吐
J BUON. 2011 Jul-Sep;16(3):541-6.
2
A triple-drug combination to prevent nausea and vomiting following BEAM chemotherapy before autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.一种三联药物组合用于预防自体造血干细胞移植前BEAM化疗后的恶心和呕吐。
Transplant Proc. 2011 Oct;43(8):3107-10. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2011.08.010.
3
Palonosetron in prevention of nausea and vomiting after highly emetogenic chemotherapy before haematopoietic stem cell transplantation-single center experience.帕洛诺司琼预防造血干细胞移植前高致吐性化疗后恶心和呕吐的单中心经验
Transplant Proc. 2009 Oct;41(8):3247-9. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2009.07.071.
4
Infusion of palonosetron plus dexamethasone for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting.输注帕洛诺司琼加地塞米松预防化疗引起的恶心和呕吐。
J Support Oncol. 2006 Oct;4(9):467-71.
5
Combination therapy for chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in patients receiving moderately emetogenic chemotherapy: palonosetron, dexamethasone, and aprepitant.接受中度致吐性化疗患者化疗引起的恶心和呕吐的联合治疗:帕洛诺司琼、地塞米松和阿瑞匹坦。
J Support Oncol. 2006 Sep;4(8):403-8.
6
Comparative study of low-dose oral granisetron plus dexamethasone and high-dose metoclopramide plus dexamethasone in prevention of nausea and vomiting induced by CHOP-therapy in young patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.低剂量口服格拉司琼加地塞米松与高剂量甲氧氯普胺加地塞米松预防年轻非霍奇金淋巴瘤患者CHOP化疗所致恶心呕吐的比较研究
J Med Assoc Thai. 2002 Nov;85(11):1156-63.
7
Phase 2 trial results with the novel neurokinin-1 receptor antagonist casopitant in combination with ondansetron and dexamethasone for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in cancer patients receiving moderately emetogenic chemotherapy.新型神经激肽-1 受体拮抗剂卡索匹坦与昂丹司琼和地塞米松联合用于预防接受中度致吐性化疗的癌症患者化疗引起的恶心和呕吐的 2 期临床试验结果。
Cancer. 2009 Dec 15;115(24):5807-16. doi: 10.1002/cncr.24630.
8
Comparison of the efficacy and safety of oral granisetron plus dexamethasone with intravenous ondansetron plus dexamethasone to control nausea and vomiting induced by moderate/severe emetogenic chemotherapy.口服格拉司琼加地塞米松与静脉注射昂丹司琼加地塞米松控制中/重度致吐性化疗引起的恶心和呕吐的疗效及安全性比较。
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi (Taipei). 2000 Oct;63(10):729-36.
9
Randomized, placebo-controlled, pilot study evaluating aprepitant single dose plus palonosetron and dexamethasone for the prevention of acute and delayed chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting.一项随机、安慰剂对照的试点研究,评估阿瑞匹坦单剂量联合帕洛诺司琼和地塞米松预防化疗引起的急性和延迟性恶心和呕吐。
Cancer. 2008 May 1;112(9):2080-7. doi: 10.1002/cncr.23364.
10
Ondansetron and dexamethasone versus standard combination antiemetic therapy. A randomized trial for the prevention of acute and delayed emesis induced by cyclophosphamide-doxorubicin chemotherapy and maintenance of antiemetic effect at subsequent courses.昂丹司琼与地塞米松对比标准联合止吐疗法:一项预防环磷酰胺-阿霉素化疗引起的急性和迟发性呕吐以及在后续疗程维持止吐效果的随机试验。
Am J Clin Oncol. 1994 Dec;17(6):522-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Antiemetic Strategies in Patients Who Undergo Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation.造血干细胞移植患者的止吐策略
Clin Hematol Int. 2022 Sep;4(3):89-98. doi: 10.1007/s44228-022-00012-8. Epub 2022 Jul 11.
2
Vitamin D levels and busulphan kinetics in patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, a multicenter study.维生素 D 水平和白消安动力学在接受造血干细胞移植的患者中的研究,一项多中心研究。
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2021 Apr;56(4):807-817. doi: 10.1038/s41409-020-01091-y. Epub 2020 Oct 21.
3
2016 updated MASCC/ESMO consensus recommendations: prevention of nausea and vomiting following multiple-day chemotherapy, high-dose chemotherapy, and breakthrough nausea and vomiting.
2016年更新的MASCC/ESMO共识建议:多日化疗、大剂量化疗后恶心和呕吐的预防以及突破性恶心和呕吐。
Support Care Cancer. 2017 Jan;25(1):303-308. doi: 10.1007/s00520-016-3449-y. Epub 2016 Nov 4.
4
A randomized trial of olanzapine versus palonosetron versus infused ondansetron for the treatment of breakthrough chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.奥氮平对比帕洛诺司琼对比静脉输注昂丹司琼治疗造血干细胞移植患者化疗引起的突破性恶心和呕吐的随机试验。
Support Care Cancer. 2017 Feb;25(2):607-613. doi: 10.1007/s00520-016-3445-2. Epub 2016 Oct 13.
5
Efficacy and safety of aprepitant in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.阿瑞匹坦在异基因造血干细胞移植中的疗效与安全性。
Pharmacotherapy. 2013 Sep;33(9):893-901. doi: 10.1002/phar.1294. Epub 2013 May 26.