University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
J Interpers Violence. 2012 Mar;27(4):793-811. doi: 10.1177/0886260511423242. Epub 2011 Oct 16.
This study explored the associations between the perpetration of partner violence and two types of face orientation-protective and acquisitive-in Chinese societies. Data from a convenience sample of 3,388 university students from Hong Kong, Shanghai, and Beijing were analyzed. The participants completed the Protective and Acquisitive Face Orientation (PAFO) Scale Short Form and the Revised Conflict Tactics Scale (CTS2) to measure their face orientations and experience of perpetrating violence against their dating partner. Acquisitive face orientation (AFO) was positively associated with the self-reported perpetration of physical and psychological partner violence. No significant associations were found between protective face orientation (PFO) and partner violence perpetration. Gender differences were found across all types of dating violence. City of residence, age, and SES were also associated with partner violence in specific ways. The findings gave insights on the possible mechanisms between partner violence and the concept of face to be explored in future research.
这项研究探讨了在中社会中,伴侣暴力行为的实施与两种面子取向——保护型和获取型——之间的关联。数据来自于来自香港、上海和北京的 3388 名大学生的便利样本。参与者完成了保护和获取面子取向量表(PAFO)短式和修订后的冲突策略量表(CTS2),以衡量他们的面子取向和对约会伴侣实施暴力的经历。获取型面子取向(AFO)与自我报告的身体和心理伴侣暴力行为呈正相关。保护型面子取向(PFO)与伴侣暴力行为的实施之间没有显著关联。在所有类型的约会暴力中都发现了性别差异。居住城市、年龄和 SES 也以特定的方式与伴侣暴力相关。这些发现为未来研究中可能探索伴侣暴力与面子概念之间的关系提供了一些见解。