• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

如关联读出模型所预测的那样,在语境中记忆单词。

Remembering words in context as predicted by an associative read-out model.

作者信息

Hofmann Markus J, Kuchinke Lars, Biemann Chris, Tamm Sascha, Jacobs Arthur M

机构信息

Neurocognitive Psychology, Department of Psychology, Freie Universität Berlin Berlin, Germany.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2011 Oct 4;2:252. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00252. eCollection 2011.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00252
PMID:22007183
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3185299/
Abstract

Interactive activation models (IAMs) simulate orthographic and phonological processes in implicit memory tasks, but they neither account for associative relations between words nor explicit memory performance. To overcome both limitations, we introduce the associative read-out model (AROM), an IAM extended by an associative layer implementing long-term associations between words. According to Hebbian learning, two words were defined as "associated" if they co-occurred significantly often in the sentences of a large corpus. In a study-test task, a greater amount of associated items in the stimulus set increased the "yes" response rates of non-learned and learned words. To model test-phase performance, the associative layer is initialized with greater activation for learned than for non-learned items. Because IAMs scale inhibitory activation changes by the initial activation, learned items gain a greater signal variability than non-learned items, irrespective of the choice of the free parameters. This explains why the slope of the z-transformed receiver-operating characteristics (z-ROCs) is lower one during recognition memory. When fitting the model to the empirical z-ROCs, it likewise predicted which word is recognized with which probability at the item-level. Since many of the strongest associates reflect semantic relations to the presented word (e.g., synonymy), the AROM merges form-based aspects of meaning representation with meaning relations between words.

摘要

交互式激活模型(IAMs)在隐式记忆任务中模拟正字法和语音过程,但它们既没有考虑单词之间的联想关系,也没有考虑显式记忆表现。为了克服这两个局限性,我们引入了联想读出模型(AROM),这是一种通过实现单词之间长期联想的联想层扩展的IAM。根据赫布学习理论,如果两个单词在一个大型语料库的句子中频繁共同出现,那么它们就被定义为“相关联”。在一项学习-测试任务中,刺激集中更多的相关项目提高了未学习和已学习单词的“是”反应率。为了模拟测试阶段的表现,联想层对已学习项目的初始激活要大于未学习项目。因为IAMs通过初始激活来缩放抑制性激活变化,所以无论自由参数如何选择,已学习项目比未学习项目获得更大的信号变异性。这就解释了为什么在识别记忆过程中,z变换后的接收者操作特征(z-ROCs)的斜率较低。当将模型拟合到经验z-ROCs时,它同样可以在项目层面预测哪个单词以何种概率被识别。由于许多最强的联想反映了与呈现单词的语义关系(例如,同义关系),AROM将基于形式的意义表示方面与单词之间的意义关系合并在一起。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/513e/3185299/bd02195da2ec/fpsyg-02-00252-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/513e/3185299/15038ba9850e/fpsyg-02-00252-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/513e/3185299/42f222e6d5a9/fpsyg-02-00252-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/513e/3185299/efd3fb5f3321/fpsyg-02-00252-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/513e/3185299/bd02195da2ec/fpsyg-02-00252-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/513e/3185299/15038ba9850e/fpsyg-02-00252-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/513e/3185299/42f222e6d5a9/fpsyg-02-00252-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/513e/3185299/efd3fb5f3321/fpsyg-02-00252-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/513e/3185299/bd02195da2ec/fpsyg-02-00252-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Remembering words in context as predicted by an associative read-out model.如关联读出模型所预测的那样,在语境中记忆单词。
Front Psychol. 2011 Oct 4;2:252. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00252. eCollection 2011.
2
Interactive activation and competition models and semantic context: From behavioral to brain data.交互式激活与竞争模型和语义语境:从行为到大脑数据。
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2014 Oct;46 Pt 1:85-104. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.06.011. Epub 2014 Jun 30.
3
No one way ticket from orthography to semantics in recognition memory: N400 and P200 effects of associations.在识别记忆中,从正字法到语义不存在单向通道:联想的N400和P200效应。
Brain Res. 2016 May 15;1639:88-98. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2016.02.029. Epub 2016 Feb 24.
4
Latent Relations at Steady-state with Associative Nets.具有关联网络的稳态潜在关系。
Cogn Sci. 2024 Sep;48(9):e13494. doi: 10.1111/cogs.13494.
5
Event-related brain potentials in memory: correlates of episodic, semantic and implicit memory.记忆中的事件相关脑电位:情景记忆、语义记忆和内隐记忆的关联
Clin Neurophysiol. 2003 Jun;114(6):1144-52. doi: 10.1016/s1388-2457(03)00044-0.
6
Recognition memory ROCs for item and associative information: the contribution of recollection and familiarity.项目和关联信息的识别记忆ROC曲线:回忆与熟悉度的作用
Mem Cognit. 1997 Nov;25(6):747-63. doi: 10.3758/bf03211318.
7
Recognition memory for faces: when familiarity supports associative recognition judgments.面部识别记忆:当熟悉度支持联想识别判断时。
Psychon Bull Rev. 1999 Dec;6(4):654-61. doi: 10.3758/bf03212975.
8
A novel co-occurrence-based approach to predict pure associative and semantic priming.一种基于新共现的方法来预测纯粹联想和语义启动。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2018 Aug;25(4):1488-1493. doi: 10.3758/s13423-018-1453-6.
9
The Associative Structure of Language: Contextual Diversity in Early Word Learning.语言的联想结构:早期词汇学习中的语境多样性
J Mem Lang. 2010 Oct 1;63(3):259-273. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2010.06.002.
10
Associative Agreement as a Predictor of Naming Ability in Alzheimer's Disease: A Case for the Semantic Nature of Associative Links.联想一致性作为阿尔茨海默病命名能力的预测指标:联想链接语义本质的一个实例
Front Behav Neurosci. 2018 Jan 9;11:261. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2017.00261. eCollection 2017.

引用本文的文献

1
Neuropsychological differential diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease and vascular dementia: a systematic review with meta-regressions.阿尔茨海默病与血管性痴呆的神经心理学鉴别诊断:一项包含元回归分析的系统评价
Front Aging Neurosci. 2023 Nov 6;15:1267434. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2023.1267434. eCollection 2023.
2
Computational Models of Readers' Apperceptive Mass.读者统觉团的计算模型
Front Artif Intell. 2022 Feb 22;5:718690. doi: 10.3389/frai.2022.718690. eCollection 2022.
3
Semantic feature activation takes time: longer SOA elicits earlier priming effects during reading.

本文引用的文献

1
A dual-route approach to orthographic processing.一种正字法加工的双路径方法。
Front Psychol. 2011 Apr 13;2:54. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00054. eCollection 2011.
2
A model for recognition memory: REM-retrieving effectively from memory.一种再认记忆模型:REM-有效地从记忆中提取。
Psychon Bull Rev. 1997 Jun;4(2):145-66. doi: 10.3758/BF03209391.
3
Six principles for biologically based computational models of cortical cognition.皮质认知的基于生物学的计算模型的六个原则。
语义特征激活需要时间:在阅读过程中,较长的 SOA 会引发更早的启动效应。
Cogn Process. 2022 May;23(2):309-318. doi: 10.1007/s10339-022-01084-3. Epub 2022 Mar 7.
4
Language Models Explain Word Reading Times Better Than Empirical Predictability.语言模型比经验可预测性能更好地解释单词阅读时间。
Front Artif Intell. 2022 Feb 2;4:730570. doi: 10.3389/frai.2021.730570. eCollection 2021.
5
Predicting Lexical Norms: A Comparison between a Word Association Model and Text-Based Word Co-occurrence Models.预测词汇规范:词联想模型与基于文本的词共现模型的比较
J Cogn. 2018 Nov 27;1(1):45. doi: 10.5334/joc.50.
6
A novel co-occurrence-based approach to predict pure associative and semantic priming.一种基于新共现的方法来预测纯粹联想和语义启动。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2018 Aug;25(4):1488-1493. doi: 10.3758/s13423-018-1453-6.
7
If You Don't Have Valence, Ask Your Neighbor: Evaluation of Neutral Words as a Function of Affective Semantic Associates.若你没有效价,问问你的邻居:作为情感语义联想函数的中性词评估。
Front Psychol. 2017 Mar 13;8:343. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00343. eCollection 2017.
8
Drifting through Basic Subprocesses of Reading: A Hierarchical Diffusion Model Analysis of Age Effects on Visual Word Recognition.解读基本阅读子过程:年龄对视觉单词识别影响的分层扩散模型分析
Front Psychol. 2016 Nov 25;7:1863. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01863. eCollection 2016.
9
Mixing positive and negative valence: Affective-semantic integration of bivalent words.混合正价与负价:二价词的情感语义整合
Sci Rep. 2016 Aug 5;6:30718. doi: 10.1038/srep30718.
10
Intuitive decision making as a gradual process: investigating semantic intuition-based and priming-based decisions with fMRI.作为一个渐进过程的直觉决策:使用功能磁共振成像研究基于语义直觉和启动效应的决策
Brain Behav. 2015 Dec 22;6(1):e00420. doi: 10.1002/brb3.420. eCollection 2016 Jan.
Trends Cogn Sci. 1998 Nov 1;2(11):455-62. doi: 10.1016/s1364-6613(98)01241-8.
4
Recognition memory for 2,578 monosyllabic words.对 2578 个单音节词的再认记忆。
Memory. 2010 Aug;18(6):595-609. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2010.493892. Epub 2010 Jul 30.
5
Affective processing within 1/10th of a second: High arousal is necessary for early facilitative processing of negative but not positive words.十分之一秒内的情感加工:高唤醒水平对于负面词汇而非正面词汇的早期促进性加工是必要的。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2009 Dec;9(4):389-97. doi: 10.3758/9.4.389.
6
Integrating experiential and distributional data to learn semantic representations.整合经验数据和分布数据以学习语义表示。
Psychol Rev. 2009 Jul;116(3):463-98. doi: 10.1037/a0016261.
7
The Berlin Affective Word List Reloaded (BAWL-R).《柏林情感词汇表升级版》(BAWL-R)
Behav Res Methods. 2009 May;41(2):534-8. doi: 10.3758/BRM.41.2.534.
8
Does familiarity or conflict account for performance in the word-stem completion task? Evidence from behavioural and event-related-potential data.在词干补全任务中,熟悉度还是冲突能够解释表现?来自行为学和事件相关电位数据的证据。
Psychol Res. 2009 Nov;73(6):871-82. doi: 10.1007/s00426-008-0189-8. Epub 2008 Nov 27.
9
A unitary signal-detection model of implicit and explicit memory.
Trends Cogn Sci. 2008 Oct;12(10):367-73. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2008.06.005. Epub 2008 Aug 27.
10
Testing computational models of letter perception with item-level event-related potentials.使用项目级事件相关电位测试字母感知的计算模型。
Cogn Neuropsychol. 2009 Feb;26(1):7-22. doi: 10.1080/09541440802176300.