• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

若你没有效价,问问你的邻居:作为情感语义联想函数的中性词评估。

If You Don't Have Valence, Ask Your Neighbor: Evaluation of Neutral Words as a Function of Affective Semantic Associates.

作者信息

Kuhlmann Michael, Hofmann Markus J, Jacobs Arthur M

机构信息

Department of Education and Psychology, Free University Berlin Berlin, Germany.

Department of Psychology, University Wuppertal Wuppertal, Germany.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2017 Mar 13;8:343. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00343. eCollection 2017.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00343
PMID:28348538
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5346566/
Abstract

How do humans perform difficult forced-choice evaluations, e.g., of words that have been previously rated as being neutral? Here we tested the hypothesis that in this case, the valence of semantic associates is of significant influence. From corpus based co-occurrence statistics as a measure of association strength we computed individual neighborhoods for single neutral words comprised of the 10 words with the largest association strength. We then selected neutral words according to the valence of the associated words included in the neighborhoods, which were either mostly positive, mostly negative, mostly neutral or mixed positive and negative, and tested them using a valence decision task (VDT). The data showed that the valence of semantic neighbors can predict valence judgments to neutral words. However, all but the positive neighborhood items revealed a high tendency to elicit negative responses. For the positive and negative neighborhood categories responses congruent with the neighborhood's valence were faster than incongruent responses. We interpret this effect as a semantic network process that supports the evaluation of neutral words by assessing the valence of the associative semantic neighborhood. In this perspective, valence is considered a semantic super-feature, at least partially represented in associative activation patterns of semantic networks.

摘要

人类如何进行困难的强制选择评估,例如对先前被评定为中性的词语进行评估?在这里,我们测试了这样一个假设:在这种情况下,语义联想词的效价具有重大影响。基于语料库的共现统计作为关联强度的一种度量,我们为单个中性词计算了由10个具有最大关联强度的词组成的个体邻域。然后,我们根据邻域中包含的关联词语的效价来选择中性词,这些邻域要么主要是积极的,要么主要是消极的,要么主要是中性的,要么是正负混合的,并使用效价决策任务(VDT)对它们进行测试。数据表明,语义邻域的效价可以预测对中性词的效价判断。然而,除了积极邻域项目外,所有项目都显示出引发负面反应的高度倾向。对于积极和消极邻域类别,与邻域效价一致的反应比不一致的反应更快。我们将这种效应解释为一种语义网络过程,该过程通过评估关联语义邻域的效价来支持对中性词的评估。从这个角度来看,效价被认为是一种语义超级特征,至少部分地体现在语义网络的关联激活模式中。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8f50/5346566/8966ef416a7b/fpsyg-08-00343-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8f50/5346566/8966ef416a7b/fpsyg-08-00343-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8f50/5346566/8966ef416a7b/fpsyg-08-00343-g0001.jpg

相似文献

1
If You Don't Have Valence, Ask Your Neighbor: Evaluation of Neutral Words as a Function of Affective Semantic Associates.若你没有效价,问问你的邻居:作为情感语义联想函数的中性词评估。
Front Psychol. 2017 Mar 13;8:343. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00343. eCollection 2017.
2
Mixing positive and negative valence: Affective-semantic integration of bivalent words.混合正价与负价:二价词的情感语义整合
Sci Rep. 2016 Aug 5;6:30718. doi: 10.1038/srep30718.
3
Are all negative words alike? Behavioral differences in processing negative words associated and not associated with physical and social pain.所有的否定词都一样吗?与身体疼痛和社会疼痛相关及不相关的否定词在处理过程中的行为差异。
Front Psychol. 2024 Sep 30;15:1474945. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1474945. eCollection 2024.
4
Semantic priming of different affective categories.不同情感类别的语义启动
Emotion. 2004 Dec;4(4):354-63. doi: 10.1037/1528-3542.4.4.354.
5
Effects of valence and arousal on affective priming vary with the degree of affective experience denoted by words.效价和唤醒度对情感启动的影响随词语所表示的情感体验程度的不同而变化。
Int J Psychophysiol. 2019 Jun;140:15-25. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2019.03.011. Epub 2019 Apr 5.
6
The Affective Meaning of Words is Constrained by the Conceptual Meaning.词语的情感意义受概念意义的限制。
J Psycholinguist Res. 2019 Dec;48(6):1377-1390. doi: 10.1007/s10936-019-09663-w.
7
Processing negative valence of word pairs that include a positive word.处理包含积极词汇的负面词对的过程。
Cogn Emot. 2016 Sep;30(6):1180-7. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2015.1039934. Epub 2015 May 26.
8
Incidental effects of emotional valence in single word processing: an fMRI study.单字加工中情绪效价的附带效应:一项功能磁共振成像研究。
Neuroimage. 2005 Dec;28(4):1022-32. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.06.050. Epub 2005 Aug 8.
9
[Connection between the evaluation of positive or negative valence and verbal responses to a lexical decision making task].[正负效价评估与词汇决策任务的言语反应之间的联系]
Can J Exp Psychol. 2005 Dec;59(4):255-61. doi: 10.1037/h0088053.
10
Disentangling Genuine Semantic Stroop Effects in Reading from Contingency Effects: On the Need for Two Neutral Baselines.区分阅读中真正的语义斯特鲁普效应与偶然效应:论两个中性基线的必要性。
Front Psychol. 2016 Mar 17;7:386. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00386. eCollection 2016.

引用本文的文献

1
Learning new words via reading: The influence of emotional narrative context on learning novel adjectives.通过阅读学习新单词:情感叙事语境对学习新形容词的影响。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2024 Dec 26;78(10):17470218241308221. doi: 10.1177/17470218241308221.
2
Neuroimaging of valence decisions in children and adults.儿童和成人情绪决策的神经影像学研究。
Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2021 Apr;48:100925. doi: 10.1016/j.dcn.2021.100925. Epub 2021 Jan 27.
3
Neural correlates of affective contributions to lexical decisions in children and adults.

本文引用的文献

1
Mixing positive and negative valence: Affective-semantic integration of bivalent words.混合正价与负价:二价词的情感语义整合
Sci Rep. 2016 Aug 5;6:30718. doi: 10.1038/srep30718.
2
Avoid violence, rioting, and outrage; approach celebration, delight, and strength: Using large text corpora to compute valence, arousal, and the basic emotions.避免暴力、骚乱和愤怒;拥抱庆祝、愉悦和力量:利用大型文本语料库计算效价、唤醒度和基本情绪。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2015;68(8):1599-622. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2014.970204. Epub 2014 Nov 17.
3
10 years of BAWLing into affective and aesthetic processes in reading: what are the echoes?
儿童和成人词汇判断中情感贡献的神经相关物。
Sci Rep. 2021 Jan 13;11(1):945. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-80359-1.
4
Bridging the theoretical gap between semantic representation models without the pressure of a ranking: some lessons learnt from LSA.在没有排名压力的情况下弥合语义表示模型之间的理论差距:从潜在语义分析中学到的一些经验教训。
Cogn Process. 2020 Feb;21(1):1-21. doi: 10.1007/s10339-019-00934-x. Epub 2019 Sep 25.
十年来对阅读中情感与审美过程的大声疾呼:有哪些反响?
Front Psychol. 2015 Jun 3;6:714. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00714. eCollection 2015.
4
Interactive activation and competition models and semantic context: From behavioral to brain data.交互式激活与竞争模型和语义语境:从行为到大脑数据。
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2014 Oct;46 Pt 1:85-104. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.06.011. Epub 2014 Jun 30.
5
The affective meanings of automatic social behaviors: three mechanisms that explain priming.自动社会行为的情感意义:解释启动的三种机制。
Psychol Rev. 2013 Jan;120(1):255-80. doi: 10.1037/a0030972. Epub 2012 Dec 10.
6
Emotion, Etmnooi, or Emitoon?--Faster lexical access to emotional than to neutral words during reading.情绪、情感还是情感表达?——阅读过程中情绪词比中性词有更快的词汇通达。
Biol Psychol. 2013 Mar;92(3):464-79. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2012.09.004. Epub 2012 Oct 8.
7
Micro-valences: perceiving affective valence in everyday objects.微效价:感知日常物品中的情感效价。
Front Psychol. 2012 Apr 17;3:107. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00107. eCollection 2012.
8
Remembering words in context as predicted by an associative read-out model.如关联读出模型所预测的那样,在语境中记忆单词。
Front Psychol. 2011 Oct 4;2:252. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00252. eCollection 2011.
9
The current status of research on the structure of evaluative space.评价空间结构研究的现状。
Biol Psychol. 2010 Jul;84(3):422-36. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2010.03.011. Epub 2010 Mar 24.
10
Integrating experiential and distributional data to learn semantic representations.整合经验数据和分布数据以学习语义表示。
Psychol Rev. 2009 Jul;116(3):463-98. doi: 10.1037/a0016261.