Suppr超能文献

机器人手术引入期间,全腹腔镜与机器人辅助子宫切除术治疗良性病变的围手术期结果比较

Comparison of Perioperative Outcomes of Total Laparoscopic and Robotically Assisted Hysterectomy for Benign Pathology during Introduction of a Robotic Program.

作者信息

Kilic Gokhan Sami, Moore Gradie, Elbatanony Ayman, Radecki Carmen, Phelps John Y, Borahay Mostafa A

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX 77555-0587, USA.

出版信息

Obstet Gynecol Int. 2011;2011:683703. doi: 10.1155/2011/683703. Epub 2011 Oct 5.

Abstract

Study Objective. Prospectively compare outcomes of robotically assisted and laparoscopic hysterectomy in the process of implementing a new robotic program. Design. Prospectively comparative observational nonrandomized study. Design Classification. II-1. Setting. Tertiary caregiver university hospital. Patients. Data collected consecutively 24 months, 34 patients underwent laparoscopic hysterectomy, 25 patients underwent robotic hysterectomy, and 11 patients underwent vaginal hysterectomy at our institution. Interventions. Outcomes of robotically assisted, laparoscopic, and vaginal complex hysterectomies performed by a single surgeon for noncancerous indications. Measurements and Main Results. Operative times were 208.3 ± 59.01 minutes for laparoscopic, 286.2 ± 82.87 minutes for robotic, and 163.5 ± 61.89 minutes for vaginal (P < .0001). Estimated blood loss for patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery was 242.7 ± 211.37 cc, 137.4 ± 107.50 cc for robotic surgery, and 243.2 ± 127.52 cc for vaginal surgery (P = 0.05). The mean length of stay ranged from 1.8 to 2.3 days for the 3 methods. Association was significant for uterine weight (P = 0.0043) among surgery methods. Conclusion. Robotically assisted hysterectomy is feasible with low morbidity, a shorter hospital stay, and less blood loss. This suggests that robotic assistance facilitates a minimally invasive approach for patients with larger uterine size even during implementing a new robotic program.

摘要

研究目的。在实施一项新的机器人手术项目过程中,前瞻性比较机器人辅助子宫切除术和腹腔镜子宫切除术的结果。设计。前瞻性比较观察性非随机研究。设计分类。II - 1。地点。三级护理大学医院。患者。连续24个月收集数据,在我们机构,34例患者接受了腹腔镜子宫切除术,25例患者接受了机器人子宫切除术,11例患者接受了阴道子宫切除术。干预措施。由一名外科医生进行的机器人辅助、腹腔镜和阴道复杂性子宫切除术治疗非癌性疾病的结果。测量指标和主要结果。腹腔镜手术的手术时间为208.3±59.01分钟,机器人手术为286.2±82.87分钟,阴道手术为163.5±61.89分钟(P <.0001)。接受腹腔镜手术患者的估计失血量为242.7±211.37毫升,机器人手术为137.4±107.50毫升,阴道手术为243.2±127.52毫升(P = 0.05)。三种方法的平均住院时间在1.8至2.3天之间。手术方式之间子宫重量的相关性显著(P = 0.0043)。结论。机器人辅助子宫切除术是可行的,发病率低,住院时间短,失血量少。这表明即使在实施新的机器人手术项目期间,机器人辅助也有助于为子宫较大的患者提供微创方法。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

6
Predictors of the cost of hysterectomy for benign indications.良性指征子宫切除术的费用预测因素。
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2021 Feb;50(2):101936. doi: 10.1016/j.jogoh.2020.101936. Epub 2020 Oct 9.

本文引用的文献

5
Comparison of robotic and laparoscopic myomectomy.机器人辅助与腹腔镜子宫肌瘤切除术的比较。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Dec;201(6):566.e1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2009.05.049. Epub 2009 Aug 15.
9
Hysterectomy for benign disease.良性疾病的子宫切除术。
Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Mar;111(3):753-67. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e318165f18c.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验