• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Comparison of Perioperative Outcomes of Total Laparoscopic and Robotically Assisted Hysterectomy for Benign Pathology during Introduction of a Robotic Program.机器人手术引入期间,全腹腔镜与机器人辅助子宫切除术治疗良性病变的围手术期结果比较
Obstet Gynecol Int. 2011;2011:683703. doi: 10.1155/2011/683703. Epub 2011 Oct 5.
2
A comparison of total laparoscopic hysterectomy to robotically assisted hysterectomy: surgical outcomes in a community practice.全腹腔镜子宫切除术与机器人辅助子宫切除术的比较:社区实践中的手术结果
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2008 May-Jun;15(3):286-91. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2008.01.008. Epub 2008 Mar 6.
3
An analysis of the impact of previous laparoscopic hysterectomy experience on the learning curve for robotic hysterectomy.既往腹腔镜子宫切除术经验对机器人辅助子宫切除术学习曲线影响的分析
J Robot Surg. 2013 Sep;7(3):295-9. doi: 10.1007/s11701-012-0388-6. Epub 2013 Feb 27.
4
Robotically assisted vs laparoscopic hysterectomy among women with benign gynecologic disease.机器人辅助与腹腔镜子宫切除术治疗良性妇科疾病的比较。
JAMA. 2013 Feb 20;309(7):689-98. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.186.
5
Comparative analysis of vaginal versus robotic-assisted hysterectomy for benign indications.良性指征下阴道子宫切除术与机器人辅助子宫切除术的对比分析
J Robot Surg. 2013 Mar;7(1):39-46. doi: 10.1007/s11701-012-0339-2. Epub 2012 Mar 14.
6
A Comparison of Outcomes Between Robotic-Assisted, Single-Site Laparoscopy Versus Laparoendoscopic Single Site for Benign Hysterectomy.机器人辅助单孔腹腔镜手术与腹腔镜单孔手术治疗良性子宫切除术的疗效比较
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2016 Jan;23(1):84-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2015.08.883. Epub 2015 Aug 29.
7
Perioperative outcomes of robotically assisted hysterectomy for benign cases with complex pathology.复杂病理良性病例机器人辅助子宫切除术的围手术期结局
Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Sep;114(3):585-593. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181b47030.
8
Comparison of robotic and other minimally invasive routes of hysterectomy for benign indications.机器人辅助与其他微创途径子宫切除术治疗良性疾病的比较。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Nov;215(5):650.e1-650.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.06.027. Epub 2016 Jun 22.
9
The impact of surgeon volume on perioperative adverse events in women undergoing minimally invasive hysterectomy for the large uterus.手术医生手术量对大子宫行微创子宫切除术的围手术期不良事件的影响。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Nov;219(5):490.e1-490.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.09.003. Epub 2018 Sep 14.
10
Robotic-assisted minimally invasive surgery for gynecologic and urologic oncology: an evidence-based analysis.机器人辅助微创手术在妇科和泌尿外科肿瘤学中的应用:一项基于证据的分析。
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2010;10(27):1-118. Epub 2010 Dec 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Uterine Weight and Perioperative Morbidity in Robotic-Assisted versus Conventional Laparoscopic Hysterectomy.机器人辅助与传统腹腔镜子宫切除术的子宫重量和围手术期发病率。
JSLS. 2023 Oct-Dec;27(4). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2023.00042.
2
Cost drivers for benign hysterectomy within a health care system: Influence of patient, perioperative, and hospital factors.良性子宫切除术在医疗体系中的成本驱动因素:患者、围手术期和医院因素的影响。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2023 May;161(2):616-623. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.14593. Epub 2022 Dec 14.
3
Impact of Obesity on Clinical and Financial Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy for Benign Conditions.肥胖对良性疾病微创子宫切除术的临床和财务结局的影响。
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2022 Sep;44(9):953-959. doi: 10.1016/j.jogc.2022.04.018. Epub 2022 May 20.
4
The Role of Robotic Visceral Surgery in Patients with Adhesions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.机器人内脏手术在粘连患者中的作用:系统评价与荟萃分析
J Pers Med. 2022 Feb 18;12(2):307. doi: 10.3390/jpm12020307.
5
Predictors of Minimally Invasive Myomectomy in the National Inpatient Sample Database, 2010-2014.2010-2014 年国家住院患者样本数据库中微创子宫肌瘤切除术的预测因素。
JSLS. 2021 Oct-Dec;25(4). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2021.00065.
6
Predictors of the cost of hysterectomy for benign indications.良性指征子宫切除术的费用预测因素。
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2021 Feb;50(2):101936. doi: 10.1016/j.jogoh.2020.101936. Epub 2020 Oct 9.
7
Postoperative Telephone-Based Questionnaire on Quality of Life after Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Hysterectomy versus Conventional Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy.机器人辅助腹腔镜子宫切除术与传统全腹腔镜子宫切除术术后基于电话的生活质量问卷
J Clin Med. 2020 Sep 2;9(9):2849. doi: 10.3390/jcm9092849.
8
Outcomes of robotic, laparoscopic, and open hysterectomy for benign conditions in obese patients.肥胖患者良性疾病的机器人辅助、腹腔镜及开腹子宫切除术的疗效
J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc. 2018 Jun 4;19(2):72-77. doi: 10.4274/jtgga.2018.0018. Epub 2018 Apr 27.
9
Health care cost consequences of using robot technology for hysterectomy: a register-based study of consecutive patients during 2006-2013.使用机器人技术进行子宫切除术的医疗成本后果:一项基于登记的2006 - 2013年连续患者研究。
J Robot Surg. 2018 Jun;12(2):283-294. doi: 10.1007/s11701-017-0725-x. Epub 2017 Jul 10.
10
Analysis of postoperative pain in robotic versus traditional laparoscopic hysterectomy.机器人辅助与传统腹腔镜子宫切除术术后疼痛分析
J Robot Surg. 2014 Mar;8(1):35-41. doi: 10.1007/s11701-013-0418-z. Epub 2013 Jul 3.

本文引用的文献

1
Robotic radical parametrectomy in benign disease: report of two cases.良性疾病的机器人根治性子宫旁组织切除术:两例报告。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2010 Aug;89(8):1108-10. doi: 10.3109/00016349.2010.481016.
2
Nationwide use of laparoscopic hysterectomy compared with abdominal and vaginal approaches.全国范围使用腹腔镜子宫切除术与经腹和经阴道途径的比较。
Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Nov;114(5):1041-1048. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181b9d222.
3
Robotic-assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy versus conventional total laparoscopic hysterectomy.机器人辅助全腹腔镜子宫切除术与传统全腹腔镜子宫切除术的比较
JSLS. 2009 Jul-Sep;13(3):364-9.
4
Perioperative outcomes of robotically assisted hysterectomy for benign cases with complex pathology.复杂病理良性病例机器人辅助子宫切除术的围手术期结局
Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Sep;114(3):585-593. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181b47030.
5
Comparison of robotic and laparoscopic myomectomy.机器人辅助与腹腔镜子宫肌瘤切除术的比较。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Dec;201(6):566.e1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2009.05.049. Epub 2009 Aug 15.
6
Short-term outcomes of robotic sacrocolpopexy compared with abdominal sacrocolpopexy.机器人骶骨阴道固定术与开腹骶骨阴道固定术的短期疗效比较。
Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Dec;112(6):1201-1206. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31818ce394.
7
Robotic surgery in gynecologic oncology: program initiation and outcomes after the first year with comparison with laparotomy for endometrial cancer staging.妇科肿瘤学中的机器人手术:项目启动及第一年的结果,并与子宫内膜癌分期的剖腹手术进行比较。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Jun;198(6):679.e1-9; discussion 679.e9-10. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.03.032.
8
A comparison of total laparoscopic hysterectomy to robotically assisted hysterectomy: surgical outcomes in a community practice.全腹腔镜子宫切除术与机器人辅助子宫切除术的比较:社区实践中的手术结果
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2008 May-Jun;15(3):286-91. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2008.01.008. Epub 2008 Mar 6.
9
Hysterectomy for benign disease.良性疾病的子宫切除术。
Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Mar;111(3):753-67. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e318165f18c.
10
Robotic radical hysterectomy: comparison with laparoscopy and laparotomy.机器人根治性子宫切除术:与腹腔镜手术和剖腹手术的比较。
Gynecol Oncol. 2008 Apr;109(1):86-91. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.01.011. Epub 2008 Feb 14.

机器人手术引入期间,全腹腔镜与机器人辅助子宫切除术治疗良性病变的围手术期结果比较

Comparison of Perioperative Outcomes of Total Laparoscopic and Robotically Assisted Hysterectomy for Benign Pathology during Introduction of a Robotic Program.

作者信息

Kilic Gokhan Sami, Moore Gradie, Elbatanony Ayman, Radecki Carmen, Phelps John Y, Borahay Mostafa A

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX 77555-0587, USA.

出版信息

Obstet Gynecol Int. 2011;2011:683703. doi: 10.1155/2011/683703. Epub 2011 Oct 5.

DOI:10.1155/2011/683703
PMID:22007229
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3189617/
Abstract

Study Objective. Prospectively compare outcomes of robotically assisted and laparoscopic hysterectomy in the process of implementing a new robotic program. Design. Prospectively comparative observational nonrandomized study. Design Classification. II-1. Setting. Tertiary caregiver university hospital. Patients. Data collected consecutively 24 months, 34 patients underwent laparoscopic hysterectomy, 25 patients underwent robotic hysterectomy, and 11 patients underwent vaginal hysterectomy at our institution. Interventions. Outcomes of robotically assisted, laparoscopic, and vaginal complex hysterectomies performed by a single surgeon for noncancerous indications. Measurements and Main Results. Operative times were 208.3 ± 59.01 minutes for laparoscopic, 286.2 ± 82.87 minutes for robotic, and 163.5 ± 61.89 minutes for vaginal (P < .0001). Estimated blood loss for patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery was 242.7 ± 211.37 cc, 137.4 ± 107.50 cc for robotic surgery, and 243.2 ± 127.52 cc for vaginal surgery (P = 0.05). The mean length of stay ranged from 1.8 to 2.3 days for the 3 methods. Association was significant for uterine weight (P = 0.0043) among surgery methods. Conclusion. Robotically assisted hysterectomy is feasible with low morbidity, a shorter hospital stay, and less blood loss. This suggests that robotic assistance facilitates a minimally invasive approach for patients with larger uterine size even during implementing a new robotic program.

摘要

研究目的。在实施一项新的机器人手术项目过程中,前瞻性比较机器人辅助子宫切除术和腹腔镜子宫切除术的结果。设计。前瞻性比较观察性非随机研究。设计分类。II - 1。地点。三级护理大学医院。患者。连续24个月收集数据,在我们机构,34例患者接受了腹腔镜子宫切除术,25例患者接受了机器人子宫切除术,11例患者接受了阴道子宫切除术。干预措施。由一名外科医生进行的机器人辅助、腹腔镜和阴道复杂性子宫切除术治疗非癌性疾病的结果。测量指标和主要结果。腹腔镜手术的手术时间为208.3±59.01分钟,机器人手术为286.2±82.87分钟,阴道手术为163.5±61.89分钟(P <.0001)。接受腹腔镜手术患者的估计失血量为242.7±211.37毫升,机器人手术为137.4±107.50毫升,阴道手术为243.2±127.52毫升(P = 0.05)。三种方法的平均住院时间在1.8至2.3天之间。手术方式之间子宫重量的相关性显著(P = 0.0043)。结论。机器人辅助子宫切除术是可行的,发病率低,住院时间短,失血量少。这表明即使在实施新的机器人手术项目期间,机器人辅助也有助于为子宫较大的患者提供微创方法。