Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, 29 N. Curley Street, Baltimore, MD, 21224.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kuwait University, Kuwait City, Kuwait, 1245 Chapel Street, New Haven, CT, 06511.
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2022 Sep;44(9):953-959. doi: 10.1016/j.jogc.2022.04.018. Epub 2022 May 20.
To evaluate the effect of obesity on clinical and financial outcomes of minimally invasive hysterectomy METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of 5 affiliated hospitals. We obtained demographic, operative, and financial characteristics to analyze the effects of obesity on outcomes, including operating room (OR) time, estimated blood loss (EBL), length of stay (LOS), adverse perioperative events, and hospital charges. Obesity was stratified by the following classes: no obesity (BMI <30 kg/m), class I (BMI 30-34 kg/m), class II (BMI 35-39 kg/m), and class III (BMI >40 kg/m). Descriptive statistics and multivariate logistic and linear regressions were performed.
A total of 2483 women underwent benign, minimally invasive hysterectomy. Laparoscopic was the most common approach (79.8%), followed by robotic (12.2%), and vaginal (8.0%). Mean BMI was 30.13 ± 6.99 kg/m, and total charges were US $13 928 ± $5954. Each additional minute in the OR increased costs by US $47.89 (P < 0.001). Compared with patients without obesity, OR time and EBL were significantly higher among patients with class I or II obesity and highest among patients with class III obesity (P < 0.001). Obesity did not affect LOS or occurrence of adverse perioperative events. Although obesity appeared to be a significant predictor of hysterectomy charges, after adjusting for covariates, charges for laparoscopic and robotic hysterectomy did not differ significantly by BMI.
Obesity appears to have a significant effect on clinical outcomes of benign hysterectomy that is approach-dependent and most notable among patients with class III obesity. BMI was not, however, a predictor of financial outcomes.
评估肥胖对微创子宫切除术临床和财务结果的影响
这是一项对 5 家附属医院的回顾性队列研究。我们获取了人口统计学、手术和财务特征,以分析肥胖对结局的影响,包括手术室(OR)时间、估计失血量(EBL)、住院时间(LOS)、围手术期不良事件和医院费用。肥胖分为以下几类:无肥胖(BMI<30kg/m)、I 类(BMI 30-34kg/m)、II 类(BMI 35-39kg/m)和 III 类(BMI>40kg/m)。进行描述性统计和多元逻辑回归和线性回归分析。
共有 2483 名女性接受了良性、微创子宫切除术。腹腔镜是最常见的方法(79.8%),其次是机器人(12.2%)和阴道(8.0%)。平均 BMI 为 30.13±6.99kg/m,总费用为 13928 美元±5954 美元。OR 每增加一分钟,费用增加 47.89 美元(P<0.001)。与无肥胖的患者相比,I 类或 II 类肥胖患者的 OR 时间和 EBL 显著升高,而 III 类肥胖患者最高(P<0.001)。肥胖并不影响 LOS 或围手术期不良事件的发生。尽管肥胖似乎是良性子宫切除术费用的重要预测因素,但在调整了协变量后,腹腔镜和机器人子宫切除术的费用与 BMI 无显著差异。
肥胖对良性子宫切除术的临床结局有显著影响,这种影响与手术方式有关,在 III 类肥胖患者中最为明显。然而,BMI 并不是财务结果的预测因素。