• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在治疗经验丰富的患者中,普泽那韦联合利托那韦与达芦那韦的比较:来自随机 POTENT 试验的观察性数据。

Boosted tipranavir versus darunavir in treatment-experienced patients: observational data from the randomized POTENT trial.

机构信息

Clinical Development and Medical Affairs, Boehringer Ingelheim (Canada) Ltd., Burlington, ON, Canada.

出版信息

Drugs R D. 2011 Dec 1;11(4):295-302. doi: 10.2165/11596340-000000000-00000.

DOI:10.2165/11596340-000000000-00000
PMID:22007990
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3585832/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The POTENT trial compared the safety and efficacy of tipranavir/ritonavir (TPV/r) to darunavir/ritonavir (DRV/r), each with an optimized background regimen (OBR) in triple-class experienced HIV-1-infected patients with resistance to more than one protease inhibitor (PI).

METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: POTENT was a prospective, open-label study of triple-class (PI, non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors [NNRTI], nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors [NRTI]), treatment-experienced, HIV-positive patients. Subjects were randomized to either TPV/r (500/200 mg twice daily) or DRV/r (600/100 mg twice daily) on a genotype-guided, investigator-selected OBR. CD4+ counts and HIV viral loads were assayed at key timepoints. The primary endpoint was time to virologic failure (viral load ≥500copies/mL). POTENT was prematurely terminated due to slow enrollment. Thirty-nine patients were treated with either TPV/r (n = 19) or DRV/r (n = 20); 82% were male, 77% White, with mean age of 43.6 years. Mean baseline HIV RNA was 3.9 log(10) copies/mL. Median prior antiretrovirals was 11, with no prior raltegravir or maraviroc exposure. Raltegravir was the most common novel class agent in the OBRs (n = 14 TPV/r; n = 12 DRV/r). In both groups, patients achieved mean viral load decreases ≥2 log(10) copies/mL by week 8, and by week 12 mean CD4+ counts rose by 40-50 cells/mm3. Total observation time was 32 weeks. Drug-related adverse events were reported in 21% (TPV/r) and 25% (DRV/r) of patients.

CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: TPV/r- and DRV/r-based regimens showed similar short-term safety and efficacy. These data support the use of next-generation PIs such as tipranavir or darunavir with novel class antiretroviral agents (integrase inhibitors, CCR5 antagonists, or fusion inhibitors).

摘要

背景

POTENT 试验比较了替拉那韦/利托那韦(TPV/r)和达芦那韦/利托那韦(DRV/r)在对一种以上蛋白酶抑制剂(PI)耐药的经三种药物治疗的 HIV-1 感染患者中与优化背景方案(OBR)联合应用的安全性和疗效。

方法/主要发现:POTENT 是一项针对经三种药物(PI、非核苷类逆转录酶抑制剂[NNRTI]、核苷类逆转录酶抑制剂[NRTI])、治疗经验丰富、HIV 阳性的患者的前瞻性、开放性研究。受试者根据基因型和研究者选择的 OBR 随机分配至 TPV/r(500/200mg 每日两次)或 DRV/r(600/100mg 每日两次)治疗。在关键时间点检测 CD4+细胞计数和 HIV 病毒载量。主要终点是病毒学失败时间(病毒载量≥500 拷贝/mL)。由于入组缓慢,POTENT 提前终止。39 例患者接受了 TPV/r(n=19)或 DRV/r(n=20)治疗;82%为男性,77%为白人,平均年龄为 43.6 岁。基线时平均 HIV RNA 为 3.9log10 拷贝/mL。中位既往抗逆转录病毒药物为 11 种,无既往拉替拉韦或马拉维若暴露。拉替拉韦是 OBR 中最常用的新型药物(TPV/r 组 n=14;DRV/r 组 n=12)。两组患者在第 8 周时均达到了平均病毒载量下降≥2log10 拷贝/mL,第 12 周时平均 CD4+细胞计数增加了 40-50 个/mm3。总观察时间为 32 周。报告了 21%(TPV/r)和 25%(DRV/r)的患者出现了药物相关不良事件。

结论/意义:TPV/r 和 DRV/r 方案显示出相似的短期安全性和疗效。这些数据支持使用替拉那韦或达芦那韦等下一代 PI 与新型抗逆转录病毒药物(整合酶抑制剂、CCR5 拮抗剂或融合抑制剂)联合应用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b7b4/4239220/e2e6ac2c7d49/40268_2012_11040295_Fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b7b4/4239220/8ab816c9f968/40268_2012_11040295_Fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b7b4/4239220/824169741429/40268_2012_11040295_Tab1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b7b4/4239220/387ee451c01c/40268_2012_11040295_Tab2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b7b4/4239220/e810db6520ab/40268_2012_11040295_Tab3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b7b4/4239220/f610ccdb9c0d/40268_2012_11040295_Fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b7b4/4239220/e2e6ac2c7d49/40268_2012_11040295_Fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b7b4/4239220/8ab816c9f968/40268_2012_11040295_Fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b7b4/4239220/824169741429/40268_2012_11040295_Tab1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b7b4/4239220/387ee451c01c/40268_2012_11040295_Tab2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b7b4/4239220/e810db6520ab/40268_2012_11040295_Tab3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b7b4/4239220/f610ccdb9c0d/40268_2012_11040295_Fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b7b4/4239220/e2e6ac2c7d49/40268_2012_11040295_Fig3.jpg

相似文献

1
Boosted tipranavir versus darunavir in treatment-experienced patients: observational data from the randomized POTENT trial.在治疗经验丰富的患者中,普泽那韦联合利托那韦与达芦那韦的比较:来自随机 POTENT 试验的观察性数据。
Drugs R D. 2011 Dec 1;11(4):295-302. doi: 10.2165/11596340-000000000-00000.
2
Virologic and immunologic effectiveness of tipranavir/ritonavir (TPV/r)- versus darunavir/ritonavir (DRV/r)-based regimens in clinical practice.在临床实践中,替拉那韦/利托那韦(TPV/r)与达芦那韦/利托那韦(DRV/r)方案的病毒学和免疫学有效性。
J Int Assoc Physicians AIDS Care (Chic). 2010 Nov-Dec;9(6):382-9. doi: 10.1177/1545109710382041.
3
Effectiveness of tipranavir versus darunavir as a salvage therapy in HIV-1 treatment-experienced patients.替拉那韦与地瑞那韦作为挽救疗法用于有HIV-1治疗经验患者的有效性比较
J Infect Dev Ctries. 2016 Sep 30;10(9):982-987. doi: 10.3855/jidc.6629.
4
Virologic Effectiveness of Abacavir/Lamivudine with Darunavir/Ritonavir Versus Other Protease Inhibitors in Treatment-Experienced HIV-Infected Patients in Clinical Practice.阿巴卡韦/拉米夫定联合达芦那韦/利托那韦与其他蛋白酶抑制剂对临床实践中接受过治疗的HIV感染患者的病毒学疗效
Clin Drug Investig. 2017 Jan;37(1):51-60. doi: 10.1007/s40261-016-0456-1.
5
Changes in darunavir/r resistance score after previous failure to tipranavir/r in HIV-1-infected multidrug-resistant patients.在先前使用替拉那韦/利托那韦治疗失败的HIV-1感染多药耐药患者中,达芦那韦/利托那韦耐药评分的变化
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2009 Feb 1;50(2):192-5. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0b013e31819367fc.
6
Tipranavir/Ritonavir (500/200 mg and 500/100 mg) Was Virologically Non-Inferior to Lopinavir/Ritonavir (400/100 mg) at Week 48 in Treatment-Naïve HIV-1-Infected Patients: A Randomized, Multinational, Multicenter Trial.替拉那韦/利托那韦(500/200毫克和500/100毫克)在初治的HIV-1感染患者中,第48周时病毒学疗效不劣于洛匹那韦/利托那韦(400/100毫克):一项随机、多国、多中心试验。
PLoS One. 2016 Jan 5;11(1):e0144917. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0144917. eCollection 2016.
7
Emerging HIV-1 resistance to tipranavir and darunavir in patients with virological failure to first-generation protease inhibitors in Taiwan.台湾地区第一代蛋白酶抑制剂病毒学治疗失败患者中出现的HIV-1对替拉那韦和达芦那韦的耐药性
Int J STD AIDS. 2011 Nov;22(11):617-20. doi: 10.1258/ijsa.2009.009007.
8
Efficacy of the protease inhibitors tipranavir plus ritonavir in treatment-experienced patients: 24-week analysis from the RESIST-1 trial.蛋白酶抑制剂替拉那韦联合利托那韦在经治患者中的疗效:RESIST-1试验的24周分析
Clin Infect Dis. 2006 Nov 15;43(10):1337-46. doi: 10.1086/508353. Epub 2006 Oct 17.
9
Darunavir: a review of its use in the management of HIV infection in adults.地瑞那韦:关于其在成人HIV感染管理中应用的综述
Drugs. 2009;69(4):477-503. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200969040-00007.
10
Efficacy and safety of three doses of tipranavir boosted with ritonavir in treatment-experienced HIV type-1 infected patients.三种剂量的替拉那韦与利托那韦联用对经治1型HIV感染患者的疗效和安全性
AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 2007 Feb;23(2):216-23. doi: 10.1089/aid.2006.0178.

引用本文的文献

1
Virologic Effectiveness of Abacavir/Lamivudine with Darunavir/Ritonavir Versus Other Protease Inhibitors in Treatment-Experienced HIV-Infected Patients in Clinical Practice.阿巴卡韦/拉米夫定联合达芦那韦/利托那韦与其他蛋白酶抑制剂对临床实践中接受过治疗的HIV感染患者的病毒学疗效
Clin Drug Investig. 2017 Jan;37(1):51-60. doi: 10.1007/s40261-016-0456-1.
2
Darunavir: a review of its use in the management of HIV-1 infection.达芦那韦:用于治疗人类免疫缺陷病毒 1 型感染的综述。
Drugs. 2014 Jan;74(1):99-125. doi: 10.1007/s40265-013-0159-3.
3
Virologic response to tipranavir-ritonavir or darunavir-ritonavir based regimens in antiretroviral therapy experienced HIV-1 patients: a meta-analysis and meta-regression of randomized controlled clinical trials.

本文引用的文献

1
Darunavir outcomes study: comparative effectiveness of virologic suppression, regimen durability, and discontinuation reasons for three-class experienced patients at 48 weeks.地瑞那韦疗效研究:三类经治患者在48周时病毒学抑制的比较效果、治疗方案持久性及停药原因
AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 2010 Dec;26(12):1279-85. doi: 10.1089/aid.2010.0059. Epub 2010 Oct 21.
2
Efficacy, safety and pharmacokinetics of 900/100 mg of darunavir/ritonavir once daily in treatment-experienced patients.每日一次服用 900/100 毫克达芦那韦/利托那韦在治疗经验丰富的患者中的疗效、安全性和药代动力学。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2010 Oct;65(10):2195-203. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkq295. Epub 2010 Aug 16.
3
基于替诺福韦/利托那韦或达芦那韦/利托那韦方案的抗逆转录病毒治疗经验的 HIV-1 患者的病毒学应答:一项随机对照临床试验的荟萃分析和荟萃回归。
PLoS One. 2013 Apr 4;8(4):e60814. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0060814. Print 2013.
4
Tipranavir in the protease inhibitors arena.蛋白酶抑制剂领域中的替拉那韦。
Drugs R D. 2011 Dec 1;11(4):291-3. doi: 10.2165/11594570-000000000-00000.
Long-term efficacy and safety of the HIV integrase inhibitor raltegravir in patients with limited treatment options in a Phase II study.
在一项 II 期研究中,对于治疗选择有限的 HIV 整合酶抑制剂拉替拉韦的长期疗效和安全性。
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2010 Apr 1;53(4):456-63. doi: 10.1097/qai.0b013e3181c9c967.
4
High rates of survival, immune reconstitution, and virologic suppression on second-line antiretroviral therapy in South Africa.南非二线抗逆转录病毒治疗的高存活率、免疫重建和病毒学抑制率。
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2010 Apr 1;53(4):500-6. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0b013e3181bcdac1.
5
Resistance to newly approved and investigational protease inhibitors.对新批准和正在研究的蛋白酶抑制剂的耐药性。
Curr Opin HIV AIDS. 2007 Mar;2(2):130-6. doi: 10.1097/COH.0b013e3280287a38.
6
Continuous improvement in the immune system of HIV-infected children on prolonged antiretroviral therapy.长期接受抗逆转录病毒治疗的HIV感染儿童免疫系统持续改善。
AIDS. 2008 Nov 12;22(17):2267-77. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0b013e3283189bb3.
7
Subgroup and resistance analyses of raltegravir for resistant HIV-1 infection.雷特格韦用于耐药HIV-1感染的亚组分析和耐药性分析。
N Engl J Med. 2008 Jul 24;359(4):355-65. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0708978.
8
Resistance profile of darunavir: combined 24-week results from the POWER trials.达芦那韦的耐药性概况:POWER试验的24周综合结果。
AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 2008 Mar;24(3):379-88. doi: 10.1089/aid.2007.0173.
9
Pharmacokinetics, safety, and efficacy of tipranavir boosted with ritonavir alone or in combination with other boosted protease inhibitors as part of optimized combination antiretroviral therapy in highly treatment-experienced patients (BI Study 1182.51).在治疗经验丰富的患者中,作为优化联合抗逆转录病毒疗法的一部分,单独使用利托那韦或与其他增效蛋白酶抑制剂联合使用增效替拉那韦的药代动力学、安全性和疗效(BI研究1182.51)
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2008 Apr 1;47(4):429-40. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0b013e318160a529.
10
Tipranavir: the first nonpeptidic protease inhibitor for the treatment of protease resistance.替拉那韦:首个用于治疗蛋白酶耐药性的非肽类蛋白酶抑制剂。
Clin Ther. 2007 Nov;29(11):2309-18. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2007.11.007.