Department of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Augment Altern Commun. 2011 Sep;27(3):141-9. doi: 10.3109/07434618.2011.610356.
There is a need for a continuous discussion about what terms one should use within the field of augmentative and alternative communication. When talking and thinking about people in their role as users of alternative communication forms, the terms should reflect their communicative ways and means, their achievements and what they are doing, rather than focus on what they cannot do. There are rather few articles analyzing utterance construction and dialogue processes involving children and adults using manual and graphic communication systems. The aim of this paper was to contribute to reviving the discussion of terminology and to more analyses of signing and aided communication and an increase in the use of conversation excerpts in the AAC Journal and elsewhere.
需要不断讨论在增强和替代沟通领域应该使用哪些术语。在谈论和思考作为替代沟通形式使用者的人时，术语应该反映他们的沟通方式和手段、他们的成就和他们正在做的事情，而不是关注他们不能做的事情。分析涉及使用手动和图形沟通系统的儿童和成人的话语构建和对话过程的文章很少。本文的目的是为了重新讨论术语，并对更多的手语和辅助沟通的分析，并增加在 AAC 杂志和其他地方使用对话摘录。
