• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

39 个低收入国家的公立和私立机构的使用和支出。

Utilization and expenditure at public and private facilities in 39 low-income countries.

机构信息

Department of Health Systems Financing, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.

出版信息

Trop Med Int Health. 2012 Jan;17(1):23-35. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3156.2011.02894.x. Epub 2011 Oct 18.

DOI:10.1111/j.1365-3156.2011.02894.x
PMID:22008480
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To document the patterns of health service utilization and health payments at public and private facilities across countries.

METHOD

We used data from the World Health Surveys from 39 low- and low-middle income countries to examine differences between public and private sectors. Utilization of outpatient and inpatient services, out-of-pocket payments (OOP) at public and private facilities, and transportation costs were compared.

RESULTS

Utilization and payments to public and private sectors differ widely. Public facilities dominated in most countries for both outpatient and inpatient services. But, whereas use of private facilities is more common among the rich, poor people also use them, to a considerable extent and in almost all the countries in the study. The majority of OOP were incurred at public providers for inpatient services. On average, this was not the case for outpatient services. Medicines accounted for the largest share of OOP for all services except inpatient services at private facilities, where consultation fees did. Transportation costs were considerable. Price competition is certainly not the only factor that guides choice of provider.

CONCLUSIONS

The results support continued efforts by the governments to engage strategically with the private sector. However, they also highlight the importance of not generalizing conditions across countries. Governments may need to reconsider simplistic user-fee abolition strategies at public providers if they simply focus on consultation fees. Policies to make health services more accessible need to consider a comprehensive benefit package that includes a wider scope of costs related to care such as expenditures on medicines and transportation.

摘要

目的

记录各国公共和私人医疗机构的卫生服务利用和卫生支出模式。

方法

我们使用了来自 39 个低收入和中低收入国家的世界卫生调查数据,以考察公私部门之间的差异。比较了门诊和住院服务在公共和私人设施的利用情况、公共和私人设施的自付费用(OOP)以及交通费用。

结果

公共和私人部门的利用和支出差异很大。在大多数国家,公共设施在门诊和住院服务方面都占主导地位。但是,尽管私人设施的使用在富人中更为普遍,但穷人也在相当程度上使用这些设施,而且在研究中的几乎所有国家都是如此。大多数 OOP 是在公共提供者处为住院服务支付的。平均而言,门诊服务并非如此。除了私人设施的住院服务外,药品占所有服务 OOP 的最大份额,而在私人设施的门诊服务中,咨询费占 OOP 的最大份额。交通费用相当可观。价格竞争肯定不是指导提供者选择的唯一因素。

结论

结果支持政府继续有策略地与私营部门合作。然而,它们也突出表明,不能将各国的情况一概而论。如果政府仅仅关注咨询费,那么它们可能需要重新考虑在公共提供者处取消简单的用户费用策略。使卫生服务更容易获得的政策需要考虑一个全面的福利套餐,其中包括与护理相关的更广泛的费用,如药品和交通支出。

相似文献

1
Utilization and expenditure at public and private facilities in 39 low-income countries.39 个低收入国家的公立和私立机构的使用和支出。
Trop Med Int Health. 2012 Jan;17(1):23-35. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3156.2011.02894.x. Epub 2011 Oct 18.
2
Out-of-pocket expenses for maternity care in rural Bangladesh: a public-private comparison.孟加拉国农村地区孕产妇保健的自付费用:公私部门比较
Int Q Community Health Educ. 2012;33(2):143-57. doi: 10.2190/IQ.33.2.d.
3
Who pays more for health services in middle-income countries: lessons from Mexico.在中等收入国家中,谁为医疗服务支付得更多:来自墨西哥的经验教训。
Public Health. 2005 Feb;119(2):150-2. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2004.03.008.
4
Hong Kong domestic health spending: financial years 1989/90 to 2008/09.香港本地健康开支:1989/90 财政年度至 2008/09 财政年度。
Hong Kong Med J. 2012 Aug;18(4 Suppl 4):1-23.
5
Health insurance and the poor in low income countries.低收入国家的医疗保险与贫困人口
World Hosp Health Serv. 2003;39(1):19-22.
6
Reducing out-of-pocket expenditures to reduce poverty: a disaggregated analysis at rural-urban and state level in India.减少自付费用以减少贫困:印度城乡和邦层面的分类分析
Health Policy Plan. 2009 Mar;24(2):116-28. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czn046. Epub 2008 Dec 17.
7
Understanding the impact of eliminating user fees: utilization and catastrophic health expenditures in Uganda.了解取消用户费用的影响:乌干达的医疗服务利用情况和灾难性医疗支出
Soc Sci Med. 2006 Feb;62(4):866-76. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.07.004. Epub 2005 Sep 1.
8
Assessment of health care needs and utilization in a mixed public-private system: the case of the Athens area.公私混合医疗体系下的医疗保健需求与利用评估:以雅典地区为例。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2006 Nov 2;6:146. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-6-146.
9
Choices and utilization in dental care: Public vs. private dental sectors, and the impact of a two-channel financed health care system.牙科护理中的选择与利用:公共与私立牙科部门,以及双通道融资医疗保健系统的影响。
Eur J Health Econ. 2006 Jun;7(2):99-106. doi: 10.1007/s10198-006-0344-3.
10
Changes in out-of-pocket payments for healthcare in Vietnam and its impact on equity in payments, 1992-2002.1992 - 2002年越南医疗保健自费支付的变化及其对支付公平性的影响
Health Policy. 2008 Oct;88(1):38-48. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2008.02.014. Epub 2008 Apr 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Multivariate decomposition of shift toward public facilities for inpatient care in rural India: evidence from National Sample Survey.印度农村地区住院治疗向公共设施转移的多变量分解:来自全国抽样调查的证据
Front Public Health. 2025 May 14;13:1491297. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1491297. eCollection 2025.
2
Knowledge, attitudes and practices related to health and well-being in a forest fringe community in southern India.印度南部一个森林边缘社区中与健康和福祉相关的知识、态度及行为。
BMC Public Health. 2025 May 6;25(1):1666. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-22653-z.
3
Delivering maternal and child health interventions through the private sector in LMIC: a scoping review of strategies and effective approaches.
通过低收入和中等收入国家的私营部门提供母婴健康干预措施:策略与有效方法的范围审查
BMJ Public Health. 2023 Dec 22;1(1):e000088. doi: 10.1136/bmjph-2023-000088. eCollection 2023 Nov.
4
Household catastrophic health expenditures for rheumatoid arthritis: a single centre study from South India.类风湿关节炎患者家庭灾难性卫生支出:来自印度南部的单中心研究。
Sci Rep. 2023 Sep 16;13(1):15385. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-42623-y.
5
Scarcity in abundance? Spatial inequalities in Rheumatoid Arthritis in a health system with financial equity.充裕中的匮乏?财政公平的卫生系统中类风湿关节炎的空间不平等。
BMC Rheumatol. 2023 Jul 11;7(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s41927-023-00332-z.
6
Unmet need for treatment-seeking from public health facilities in India: An analysis of sociodemographic, regional and disease-wise variations.印度公共卫生设施寻求治疗的未满足需求:社会人口统计学、地区和疾病方面差异的分析
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2022 Apr 19;2(4):e0000148. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0000148. eCollection 2022.
7
Health services utilization and associated factors among fee waiver beneficiaries' in Dessie city administration, Northeast Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study design.埃塞俄比亚东北部德西市政府免费受益人的卫生服务利用及其影响因素:一项横断面研究设计。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Dec 17;22(1):1544. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08963-7.
8
Disease-specific distress healthcare financing and catastrophic out-of-pocket expenditure for hospitalization in Bangladesh.孟加拉国特定疾病困扰、医疗保健融资以及住院灾难性自付支出
Int J Equity Health. 2022 Aug 20;21(1):114. doi: 10.1186/s12939-022-01712-6.
9
A STUDY OF CATASTROPHIC HEALTH EXPENDITURES IN INDIA - EVIDENCE FROM NATIONALLY REPRESENTATIVE SURVEY DATA: 2014-2018.印度灾难性卫生支出研究——基于全国代表性调查数据的证据:2014-2018 年。
F1000Res. 2022 Feb 3;11:141. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.75808.1. eCollection 2022.
10
The long-term effects of free care on birth outcomes: Evidence from a national policy reform in Zambia.免费医疗对分娩结局的长期影响:来自赞比亚一项国家政策改革的证据。
SSM Popul Health. 2022 Feb 24;17:101051. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2022.101051. eCollection 2022 Mar.