Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Kroto Research Institute, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom.
Tissue Eng Part B Rev. 2012 Apr;18(2):116-28. doi: 10.1089/ten.TEB.2011.0498. Epub 2011 Dec 8.
Nerve guides are increasingly being used surgically to repair acute peripheral nerve injuries. This is not only due to an increase in the number of commercially available devices, but also clinical acceptance. However, regeneration distance is typically limited to 20-25 mm, in part due to the basic tubular design. A number of experimental studies have shown improvements in nerve regeneration distance when conduits incorporate coatings, internal scaffolds, topographical cues, or the delivery of support cells. Current studies on designing nerve guides for maximizing nerve regeneration focus both on cell-containing and cell-free devices, the latter being clinically attractive as "off the shelf" products. Arguably better results are obtained when conduits are used in conjunction with support cells (e.g., Schwann cells or stem cells) that can improve regeneration distance and speed of repair, and provide informative experimental data on how Schwann and neuronal cells respond in regenerating injured nerves. In this review we discuss the range of current nerve guides commercially available and appraise experimental studies in the context of the future design of nerve guides for clinical use.
神经导管越来越多地被用于外科手术修复急性周围神经损伤。这不仅是因为商业上可获得的设备数量增加,而且还因为临床接受度提高。然而,再生距离通常限于 20-25mm,部分原因是基本的管状设计。许多实验研究表明,当导管包含涂层、内部支架、形貌线索或支持细胞的输送时,神经再生距离会有所改善。目前,关于设计神经导管以最大限度地促进神经再生的研究既关注含有细胞的装置,也关注无细胞的装置,后者作为“现成的”产品在临床上具有吸引力。当导管与支持细胞(例如施万细胞或干细胞)一起使用时,可能会获得更好的结果,这些支持细胞可以改善再生距离和修复速度,并提供有关施万细胞和神经元细胞在再生受损神经中反应的有价值的实验数据。在这篇综述中,我们讨论了目前市售的各种神经导管,并根据未来临床使用的神经导管设计评估了实验研究。