Suppr超能文献

超声压迫检查作为深静脉血栓形成的可靠影像学监测手段。

Compression ultrasonography as a reliable imaging monitor in deep venous thrombosis.

作者信息

Mussurakis S, Papaioannou S, Voros D, Vrakatselis T

机构信息

Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Hippokration General Hospital, Athens, Greece.

出版信息

Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1990 Sep;171(3):233-9.

PMID:2201094
Abstract

Our experience at Hippokration Athens Hospital with high-resolution real-time ultrasonography of the deep veins of the lower extremities is described, drawn from the results of a prospective comparative study of 65 patients. We used a combination of sonography and contrast venography for the detection of deep venous thrombosis (DVT). Of the study group, 33 had clinically suspected DVT, 20 were asymptomatic high-risk patients, while 12 with varicosities of the leg and scheduled for saphenectomy were examined preoperatively for deep venous patency confirmation. For all patients, venography, the reference method, was performed within 12 hours of the ultrasound scan. Since 29 of the examinations were bilateral, the total number of extremities studied was 94. The sonographic criteria analyzed were the intraluminal echogenicity and the venous compressibility with the ultrasound transducer probe. In addition, the response of the common femoral vein to the Valsalva maneuver was studied. Among these three criteria, compressibility was by far the most accurate. Noncompressible abnormal veins were noted in all of the 24 extremities with proximal thrombosis and in six of the 12 with thrombosis limited to the calf veins. Thus, the sensitivity of the compressibility criterion was 100 per cent for proximal and 50 per cent for isolated calf venous thrombosis (83 per cent). All venographically patent veins were fully compressible (specificity, 100 per cent). Abnormal intraluminal echoes were found in 18 of the 36 extremities with thrombosis but not in those with negative findings on venography. Sensitivity of intraluminal echogenicity was, therefore, 50 per cent and specificity, 100 per cent. For the Valsalva criterion, the standard lower normal limit of 10 per cent was applied, leading to 40 per cent sensitivity and 93 per cent specificity rates. In comparison with venography, ultrasonography underestimated the extent of thrombosis in 60 per cent of the true-positive examinations, although never to a clinically significant degree. In conclusion, compression ultrasonography, a technique based upon the unique criterion of venous compressibility, is a highly accurate and objective noninvasive diagnostic method, and is also suitable as a screening test. We urge clinicians to support their therapeutic decisions concerning the management of DVT with it.

摘要

本文描述了雅典希波克拉底医院对65例患者进行下肢深静脉高分辨率实时超声检查的经验,这些经验来源于一项前瞻性对比研究的结果。我们联合使用超声检查和静脉造影来检测深静脉血栓形成(DVT)。在研究组中,33例临床上怀疑患有DVT,20例为无症状高危患者,另有12例患有下肢静脉曲张且计划进行大隐静脉切除术,术前对其进行检查以确认深静脉通畅情况。对于所有患者,作为参考方法的静脉造影在超声扫描后12小时内进行。由于29例检查为双侧检查,因此研究的肢体总数为94个。分析的超声检查标准包括管腔内回声特性以及超声换能器探头对静脉的压迫性。此外,还研究了股总静脉对瓦尔萨尔瓦动作的反应。在这三个标准中,压迫性是迄今为止最准确的。在所有24例近端血栓形成的肢体以及12例仅累及小腿静脉血栓形成的肢体中的6例中,均发现了不可压迫的异常静脉。因此,压迫性标准对近端血栓形成的敏感性为100%,对孤立性小腿静脉血栓形成的敏感性为50%(总体敏感性为83%)。所有静脉造影显示通畅的静脉均可完全被压迫(特异性为100%)。在36例有血栓形成的肢体中的18例中发现了异常管腔内回声,但在静脉造影结果为阴性的肢体中未发现。因此,管腔内回声特性的敏感性为50%,特异性为100%。对于瓦尔萨尔瓦动作标准,采用标准下限正常值10%,敏感性为40%,特异性为9%。与静脉造影相比,在60%的真阳性检查中,超声检查低估了血栓形成的范围,尽管从未达到具有临床意义的程度。总之,压迫性超声检查是一种基于静脉压迫性这一独特标准的技术,是一种高度准确且客观的无创诊断方法,也适合作为筛查试验。我们敦促临床医生在对DVT的治疗决策中采用该方法。

引用本文的文献

1
Multimodality imaging of the peripheral venous system.
Int J Biomed Imaging. 2007;2007:54616. doi: 10.1155/2007/54616.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验