Suppr超能文献

Comparison between transthoracic echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in patients status post atrial switch procedure.

作者信息

Ho Jason G, Cohen Mervyn D, Ebenroth Eric S, Schamberger Marcus S, Cordes Timothy M, Bramlet Matthew T, Hurwitz Roger A, Johnson Tiffanie R

机构信息

Section of Pediatric Cardiology, Department of Pediatrics, Riley Hospital for Children, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Ind 46202, USA.

出版信息

Congenit Heart Dis. 2012 Mar-Apr;7(2):122-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1747-0803.2011.00571.x. Epub 2011 Oct 20.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This study compares image quality, cost, right ventricular ejection fraction analysis, and baffle visualization between transthoracic echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in those status post atrial switch for transposition of the great arteries.

BACKGROUND

This population requires imaging for serial evaluations. Transthoracic echocardiography is often first line but has drawbacks, many of which are addressed by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging.

METHODS

Twelve patients (mean age 25 years) with relatively concurrent (mean 157 days) studies were included. Three separate echocardiography and magnetic resonance imaging physicians independently analyzed baffles, image quality, and right ventricular ejection fractions. Institutional and Medicaid charges were compared.

RESULTS

For right ventricular ejection fraction, echocardiography (36.1%) underestimated cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (47.8%, P = .002). Image quality for transthoracic echocardiography was significantly rated lower than cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (P = .002). Baffles were better seen in cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (transthoracic echocardiography vs. cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: superior vena cava 86% vs. 100% [P = .063]; inferior vena cava 33% vs. 97% [P = .002]; pulmonary vein 92% vs. 100% [P = .250]). Comparing hospital charges and Medicaid reimbursement, transthoracic echocardiography respectively costs 18% and 38% less than cardiac magnetic resonance imaging.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, transthoracic echocardiography underestimated right ventricular ejection fraction compared to cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging had consistently higher image quality and better visualization of the baffles. Cost differences are minimal. We propose that cardiac magnetic resonance imaging be considered first line for imaging in certain patients' status post atrial switch procedure.

摘要

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验