Bhan M K, Sazawal S, Bhatnagar S, Bhandari N, Guha D K, Aggarwal S K
Division of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Enteric Infections, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi.
Acta Paediatr Scand. 1990 May;79(5):518-26. doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.1990.tb11506.x.
We evaluated the efficacy and safety of an oral rehydration solution containing glycyl-glycine, glycine, and maltodextrin (GGG-ORS), in comparison to the glucose based ORS (standard ORS). The osmolality of the GGG-ORS (305 mOsm/l) and standard ORS (311 mOsm/l) was similar. Ninety-two children presenting with acute gastroenteritis and moderate dehydration, aged 3 months to 3 years, were randomly assigned to receive standard ORS or GGG-ORS. All the patients were successfully rehydrated orally. The two groups were comparable for baseline characteristics including the microbial etiology. Rotavirus (49%, 36%), ETEC (11%, 18%) or a combination of rotavirus and ETEC (15%, 9%) were the main stool pathogens isolated. There was no significant difference in the mean stool output or duration of diarrhoea between the two groups. Patients in the GGG-ORS group had higher urine output (p less than 0.01) and weight gain (p less than 0.05) in the initial 6 hours when feeding was withheld, but no such differences were observed beyond this period. Hypernatremia did not develop in any patient during the study. We conclude that glycine and glycyl-glycine supplemented oral rehydration solution does not have any therapeutic advantage in the treatment of acute gastroenteritis with moderate dehydration caused predominantly by rotavirus.
我们评估了一种含有甘氨酰甘氨酸、甘氨酸和麦芽糊精的口服补液溶液(GGG-ORS)与基于葡萄糖的口服补液溶液(标准ORS)相比的疗效和安全性。GGG-ORS(305毫渗摩尔/升)和标准ORS(311毫渗摩尔/升)的渗透压相似。92名年龄在3个月至3岁、患有急性肠胃炎并伴有中度脱水的儿童被随机分配接受标准ORS或GGG-ORS。所有患者均通过口服成功补液。两组在包括微生物病因在内的基线特征方面具有可比性。分离出的主要粪便病原体为轮状病毒(49%,36%)、肠毒素性大肠杆菌(11%,18%)或轮状病毒与肠毒素性大肠杆菌的组合(15%,9%)。两组之间的平均粪便排出量或腹泻持续时间没有显著差异。在禁食的最初6小时内,GGG-ORS组患者的尿量(p小于0.01)和体重增加(p小于0.05)更高,但在此之后未观察到此类差异。在研究期间,没有任何患者发生高钠血症。我们得出结论,补充甘氨酸和甘氨酰甘氨酸的口服补液溶液在治疗主要由轮状病毒引起的伴有中度脱水的急性肠胃炎方面没有任何治疗优势。