Suppr超能文献

使用单一溶液对腹泻且伴有轻度至中度脱水的婴儿进行口服补液及维持治疗。

Use of a single solution for oral rehydration and maintenance therapy of infants with diarrhea and mild to moderate dehydration.

作者信息

Cohen M B, Mezoff A G, Laney D W, Bezerra J A, Beane B M, Drazner D, Baker R, Moran J R

机构信息

Division of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH 45229, USA.

出版信息

Pediatrics. 1995 May;95(5):639-45.

PMID:7724298
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy of two commonly used solutions in the rehydration of infants with mild to moderate dehydration caused by acute diarrhea in the United States.

DESIGN AND SETTING

Double-blind, parallel-group, randomized study performed at Children's Hospital Medical Center.

PATIENTS

Sixty infant boys (< or = 2 years old), with mild (< or = 5%) or moderate (6 to 9%) dehydration caused by acute diarrhea of less than 1 week's duration were included in the study.

INTERVENTIONS

Infants were randomly assigned to receive treatment with either a glucose-based oral rehydration solution (ORS) (Pedialyte, Ross Laboratories, Columbus, OH) or a rice syrup solids-based ORS (Infalyte, Mead Johnson Nutritional Group, Evansville, IN). After rehydration was achieved, patients entered a maintenance phase during which, in addition to a maintenance ORS, breast milk or a soy-based formula was offered; infants older than 1 year were also given a lactose-free diet.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Rehydration was judged clinically. Infants remained on a metabolic bed during the study in to separate and quantitate urine and stool output. Therefore, in addition to clinical outcome, we compared intake, output and apparent absorption and retention of fluid, sodium, and potassium between groups.

RESULTS

All patients were successfully rehydrated using an ORS without the use of intravenous fluids. No differences were detected between treatment groups in time to rehydration, percentage of weight gain after rehydration, consumption of ORS to achieve rehydration, or stool output. However, the apparent sodium absorption (net intake less fecal output) was greater in the Infalyte group than the Pedialyte group during the first 24 hours.

CONCLUSION

The two maintenance oral electrolyte solutions (Pedialyte and Infalyte) most commonly used in the United States are effective as rehydration solutions for infants with mild to moderate dehydration. We speculate that a strategy for oral rehydration therapy in the United States, based on the use of a single solution during the rehydration and maintenance phase, might gain additional acceptance by practicing pediatricians and family physicians.

摘要

目的

比较在美国用于急性腹泻所致轻至中度脱水婴儿补液的两种常用溶液的疗效。

设计与地点

在儿童医院医疗中心进行的双盲、平行组随机研究。

患者

60名男婴(年龄≤2岁),因病程小于1周的急性腹泻导致轻度(≤5%)或中度(6%至9%)脱水,纳入本研究。

干预措施

婴儿被随机分配接受基于葡萄糖的口服补液溶液(ORS)(Pedialyte,罗斯实验室,俄亥俄州哥伦布市)或基于米糖浆固体的ORS(Infalyte,美赞臣营养集团,印第安纳州埃文斯维尔市)治疗。补液成功后,患者进入维持阶段,在此期间,除了维持用ORS外,还提供母乳或大豆配方奶;1岁以上婴儿还给予无乳糖饮食。

观察指标

通过临床判断补液情况。在研究期间,婴儿躺在代谢床上以分别收集和定量尿液及粪便排出量。因此,除了临床结果外,我们还比较了两组之间液体、钠和钾的摄入量、排出量以及表观吸收和潴留情况。

结果

所有患者使用ORS均成功补液,无需使用静脉输液。治疗组之间在补液时间、补液后体重增加百分比、达到补液所需ORS的消耗量或粪便排出量方面未检测到差异。然而,在最初24小时内,Infalyte组的表观钠吸收(净摄入量减去粪便排出量)高于Pedialyte组。

结论

在美国最常用的两种维持性口服电解质溶液(Pedialyte和Infalyte)作为轻至中度脱水婴儿的补液溶液是有效的。我们推测,基于在补液和维持阶段使用单一溶液的美国口服补液疗法策略,可能会获得执业儿科医生和家庭医生更多的认可。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验