Suppr超能文献

总体肥胖和腹部肥胖均通过不同的机制增加血液黏度。

Both overall adiposity and abdominal adiposity increase blood viscosity by separate mechanisms.

机构信息

Physiopathologie & Médecine Expérimentale du Coeur et des Muscles INSERM U1046, Unité d'Explorations Métaboliques (CERAMM), Service Central de Physiologie Clinique, Hôpital Lapeyronie CHU Montpellier, France.

出版信息

Clin Hemorheol Microcirc. 2011;48(4):257-63. doi: 10.3233/CH-2011-1418.

Abstract

While recent studies suggested that both general adiposity and abdominal adiposity are associated with the risk of death and support the use of waist circumference or waist-to-hip ratio (WHR) in addition to body index mass (BMI) in assessing the risk of death, this issue remains cintroversial since most authors conclude that BMI explains almost all the obesity-related risk of diabetes and conary heart disease (CHD). We investigated the separate effects of BMI and WHR on blood rheology in 430 patients attending to a metabolic check-up and exhibiting all the spectrum of age (11-77 yr) and BMI (15-50 kg/m2). BMI and WHR are correlated to each other (r = 0.269; p = 0.009) and are both predictors of blood viscosity (BMI: r = 0.15516; p = 0.004; WHR: r = 0.3638; p = 0.03). However while looking at determinants of viscosity these correlations had not the same meaning. For BMI it was explained by its correlation with plasma viscosity (r = 0.17718; p = 0.00105) and red blood cells (RBC) aggregation (all Myrenne and SEFAM indices with r ranging between 0.226 and 0.430) while these parameters were not correlated to WHR. By contrast WHR was strongly correlated with hematocrit (r = 0.524; p = 0.0003) which was not correlated with BMI. A forward stepwise regression selected WRH as a better predictor of blood viscosity, excluding BMI. Thus both BMI and WHR are associated with increased blood viscosity but these correlations reflect separate mechanisms. These data suggest that both overall adiposity and abdominal adiposity induce hyper viscosity, consistent with epidemiological studies linking the risk of CHD to abdominal adiposity and BMI.

摘要

虽然最近的研究表明,总体肥胖和腹部肥胖都与死亡风险相关,并支持在评估死亡风险时除了身体质量指数(BMI)外还使用腰围或腰臀比(WHR),但由于大多数作者得出的结论是 BMI 几乎可以解释肥胖与糖尿病和冠心病(CHD)的相关性风险,因此这个问题仍然存在争议。我们研究了 430 名接受代谢检查的患者中 BMI 和 WHR 对血液流变学的单独影响,这些患者的年龄范围从 11 岁到 77 岁,BMI 范围从 15 公斤/平方米到 50 公斤/平方米。BMI 和 WHR 相互关联(r = 0.269;p = 0.009),并且都是血液粘度的预测因子(BMI:r = 0.15516;p = 0.004;WHR:r = 0.3638;p = 0.03)。然而,在观察粘度的决定因素时,这些相关性并没有相同的意义。对于 BMI,它与血浆粘度(r = 0.17718;p = 0.00105)和红细胞(RBC)聚集(所有 Myrenne 和 SEFAM 指数的 r 值在 0.226 到 0.430 之间)相关,而这些参数与 WHR 不相关。相比之下,WHR 与红细胞压积(r = 0.524;p = 0.0003)高度相关,而红细胞压积与 BMI 不相关。向前逐步回归选择 WHR 作为血液粘度的更好预测因子,排除了 BMI。因此,BMI 和 WHR 都与血液粘度增加有关,但这些相关性反映了不同的机制。这些数据表明,总体肥胖和腹部肥胖都会导致血液高粘度,与将 CHD 风险与腹部肥胖和 BMI 相关联的流行病学研究一致。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验