Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2012 Feb;14(2):175-82. doi: 10.1089/dia.2011.0163. Epub 2011 Oct 20.
We compared telecare and conventional self-monitored blood glucose (SMBG) programs for titrating the addition of one bolus injection of insulin glulisine in patients with type 2 diabetes uncontrolled on oral hypoglycemic agents for ≥3 months who were first titrated with basal insulin glargine.
This randomized, multicenter, parallel-group study included 241 patients (mean screening glycosylated hemoglobin [HbA(1c)], 8.8% [73 mmol/mol]). In the run-in phase, any antidiabetes medication, except for metformin, was discontinued. Metformin was then up-titrated to 2 g/day (1 g twice daily) until study completion. Following run-in, all patients started glargine for 8-16 weeks, targeting fasting plasma glucose (FPG) ≤5.6 mmol/L using conventional SMBG. Patients with FPG ≤7 mmol/L added a glulisine dose at the meal with the highest postprandial plasma glucose excursion, titrated to target 2-h postprandial plasma glucose level <7.8 mmol/L using telecare or SMBG for 24 weeks. Patients with FPG >7 mmol/L at week 16 were withdrawn from the study.
After glargine titration, 224 patients achieved FPG ≤7 mmol/L, without any difference between telecare and SBMG groups (mean±SD, 6.2±0.8 vs. 6.0±0. 9 mmol/L, respectively). HbA(1c) levels were lower following titration and were similar for telecare and SMBG (7.9±0.9% vs. 7.8±0.9% [63 vs. 62 mmol/mol], respectively). Adding glulisine further reduced HbA(1c) in both groups (-0.7% vs. -0.7%); 45.2% and 54.8% (P=0.14), respectively, of patients achieved HbA(1c) ≤7.0% (≤53 mmol/mol). Weight change and hypoglycemia were similar between groups.
Patients adding one dose of glulisine at the meal with the highest postprandial plasma glucose excursion to titrated basal glargine achieved comparable improvements in glycemic control irrespective of traditional or telecare blood glucose monitoring.
我们比较了远程医疗和常规自我监测血糖(SMBG)方案,以调整 2 型糖尿病患者的胰岛素用量,这些患者在使用甘精胰岛素的基础上,联合口服降糖药治疗 3 个月以上仍未得到控制(糖化血红蛋白 [HbA1c]>8.8%[73mmol/mol])。
这是一项随机、多中心、平行分组研究,共纳入 241 例患者(平均筛查时糖化血红蛋白 [HbA1c]为 8.8%[73mmol/mol])。在导入期,除二甲双胍外,所有降糖药物均被停用。然后,逐步增加二甲双胍的剂量,每天 2g(每天 1 次,每次 1g),直至研究结束。导入期结束后,所有患者开始使用甘精胰岛素治疗 8-16 周,采用常规 SMBG 使空腹血糖(FPG)≤5.6mmol/L。FPG≤7mmol/L 的患者在餐后血糖最高的那次用餐时添加 1 次门冬胰岛素,调整餐后 2 小时血糖目标值<7.8mmol/L,采用远程医疗或 SMBG 治疗 24 周。FPG 在第 16 周时>7mmol/L 的患者退出研究。
甘精胰岛素滴定后,224 例患者 FPG≤7mmol/L,远程医疗组和 SMBG 组之间无差异(分别为 6.2±0.8mmol/L 和 6.0±0.9mmol/L)。治疗后 HbA1c 水平降低,且远程医疗组和 SMBG 组之间无差异(分别为 7.9±0.9%和 7.8±0.9%[63mmol/mol 和 62mmol/mol])。两组患者加用门冬胰岛素后 HbA1c 进一步降低(分别降低 0.7%和 0.7%);45.2%和 54.8%(P=0.14)的患者达到 HbA1c≤7.0%(≤53mmol/mol)。两组体重变化和低血糖发生率相似。
在接受甘精胰岛素基础上联合餐时门冬胰岛素治疗的患者中,无论采用传统还是远程医疗血糖监测,血糖控制的改善情况相当。