• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

嵌入电子健康记录中的临床信息门户的影响及用户满意度

Impact and user satisfaction of a clinical information portal embedded in an electronic health record.

作者信息

Tannery Nancy H, Epstein Barbara A, Wessel Charles B, Yarger Frances, LaDue John, Klem Mary Lou

机构信息

Health Sciences Library System, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.

出版信息

Perspect Health Inf Manag. 2011;8(Fall):1d. Epub 2011 Oct 1.

PMID:22016670
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3193509/
Abstract

In 2008, a clinical information tool was developed and embedded in the electronic health record system of an academic medical center. In 2009, the initial information tool, Clinical-e, was superseded by a portal called Clinical Focus, with a single search box enabling a federated search of selected online information resources. To measure the usefulness and impact of Clinical Focus, a survey was used to gather feedback about users' experience with this clinical resource. The survey determined what type of clinicians were using this tool and assessed user satisfaction and perceived impact on patient care decision making. Initial survey results suggest the majority of respondents found Clinical Focus easy to navigate, the content easy to read, and the retrieved information relevant and complete. The majority would recommend Clinical Focus to their colleagues. Results indicate that this tool is a promising area for future development.

摘要

2008年,一种临床信息工具被开发出来并嵌入到一家学术医疗中心的电子健康记录系统中。2009年,最初的信息工具Clinical-e被一个名为Clinical Focus的门户所取代,该门户有一个单一的搜索框,能够对选定的在线信息资源进行联合搜索。为了衡量Clinical Focus的实用性和影响,一项调查被用来收集关于用户使用这一临床资源的体验的反馈。该调查确定了使用这一工具的临床医生类型,并评估了用户满意度以及对患者护理决策的感知影响。初步调查结果表明,大多数受访者认为Clinical Focus易于操作,内容易于阅读,检索到的信息相关且完整。大多数人会向同事推荐Clinical Focus。结果表明,这一工具是未来发展的一个有前景的领域。

相似文献

1
Impact and user satisfaction of a clinical information portal embedded in an electronic health record.嵌入电子健康记录中的临床信息门户的影响及用户满意度
Perspect Health Inf Manag. 2011;8(Fall):1d. Epub 2011 Oct 1.
2
Disseminating context-specific access to online knowledge resources within electronic health record systems.在电子健康记录系统中传播针对特定情境的在线知识资源访问权限。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2013;192:672-6.
3
Optimization of infobutton design and Implementation: A systematic review.优化信息按钮设计与实现:系统综述。
J Biomed Inform. 2017 Oct;74:10-19. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2017.08.010. Epub 2017 Aug 22.
4
Use, usability, usefulness, and impact of an infobutton manager.信息按钮管理器的使用、可用性、有用性及影响
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2006;2006:151-5.
5
Electronic health record: integrating evidence-based information at the point of clinical decision making.电子健康记录:在临床决策点整合基于证据的信息。
J Med Libr Assoc. 2014 Jan;102(1):52-5. doi: 10.3163/1536-5050.102.1.010.
6
Embedding a Medical Search Engine Within an Electronic Health Record.将医学搜索引擎嵌入电子健康记录中。
Mo Med. 2017 Jul-Aug;114(4):316-320.
7
Clinician perceptions of an electronic medical record during the first year of implementaton in emergency services.临床医生在急诊服务实施的第一年对电子病历的看法。
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2010 Feb;26(2):107-10. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e3181ce2f99.
8
Assessing the electronic Bedside Paediatric Early Warning System: A simulation study on decision-making and usability.评估电子床旁儿科早期预警系统:一项关于决策和可用性的模拟研究。
Int J Med Inform. 2020 Jan;133:103969. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2019.103969. Epub 2019 Sep 14.
9
Experiences sharing of implementing Template-based Electronic Medical Record System (TEMRS) in a Hong Kong medical organization.在香港医疗机构实施基于模板的电子病历系统 (TEMRS) 的经验分享。
J Med Syst. 2011 Dec;35(6):1605-15. doi: 10.1007/s10916-010-9436-9. Epub 2010 Feb 2.
10
Checking the potential shift to perceived usefulness-The analysis of users' response to the updated electronic health record core features.检查感知有用性的潜在变化-对更新的电子健康记录核心功能的用户反应的分析。
Int J Med Inform. 2018 Jul;115:80-91. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2018.04.011. Epub 2018 Apr 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Embedding a Medical Search Engine Within an Electronic Health Record.将医学搜索引擎嵌入电子健康记录中。
Mo Med. 2017 Jul-Aug;114(4):316-320.
2
Evaluating a federated medical search engine: tailoring the methodology and reporting the evaluation outcomes.评估一个联合医学搜索引擎:调整方法并报告评估结果。
Appl Clin Inform. 2014 Aug 13;5(3):731-45. doi: 10.4338/ACI-2014-03-RA-0021. eCollection 2014.

本文引用的文献

1
Development of a clinical information tool for the electronic medical record: a case study.开发电子病历临床信息工具:案例研究。
J Med Libr Assoc. 2010 Jul;98(3):223-7. doi: 10.3163/1536-5050.98.3.010.
2
Replacing an inpatient electronic medical record. Lessons learned from user satisfaction with the former system.更换住院电子病历。从用户对旧系统的满意度中吸取的经验教训。
Methods Inf Med. 2009;48(1):92-100.
3
Validation of Surgical Intensive Care-Infection Registry: a medical informatics system for intensive care unit research, quality of care improvement, and daily patient care.外科重症监护感染登记系统的验证:一个用于重症监护病房研究、改善护理质量和日常患者护理的医学信息系统。
J Am Coll Surg. 2008 Aug;207(2):164-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2008.04.025. Epub 2008 Jun 24.
4
Determinants of user satisfaction with a Clinical Information System.临床信息系统用户满意度的决定因素。
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2006;2006:614-8.
5
Survey research.调查研究。
Annu Rev Psychol. 1999;50:537-67. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.50.1.537.
6
Electronic health record meets digital library: a new environment for achieving an old goal.电子健康记录邂逅数字图书馆:实现旧目标的新环境。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2000 Sep-Oct;7(5):444-52. doi: 10.1136/jamia.2000.0070444.