Tomasselli A G, Hui J O, Sawyer T K, Staples D J, Bannow C, Reardon I M, Howe W J, DeCamp D L, Craik C S, Heinrikson R L
Biopolymer Chemistry, Upjohn Company, Kalamazoo, Michigan 49001.
J Biol Chem. 1990 Aug 25;265(24):14675-83.
Highly purified, recombinant preparations of the virally encoded proteases from human immunodeficiency viruses (HIV) 1 and 2 have been compared relative to 1) their specificities toward non-viral protein and synthetic peptide substrates, and 2) their inhibition by several P1-P1' pseudodipeptidyl-modified substrate analogs. Hydrolysis of the Leu-Leu and Leu-Ala bonds in the Pseudomonas exotoxin derivative, Lys-PE40, is qualitatively the same for HIV-2 protease as published earlier for the HIV-1 enzyme (Tomasselli, A. G., Hui, J. O., Sawyer, T. K., Staples, D. J., FitzGerald, D. J., Chaudhary, V. K., Pastan, I., and Heinrikson, R. L. (1990) J. Biol. Chem. 265, 408-413). However, the rates of cleavage at these two sites are reversed for the HIV-2 protease which prefers the Leu-Ala bond. The kinetics of hydrolysis of this protein substrate by both enzymes are mirrored by those obtained from cleavage of model peptides. Hydrolysis by the two proteases of other synthetic peptides modeled after processing sites in HIV-1 and HIV-2 gag polyproteins and selected analogs thereof demonstrated differences, as well as similarities, in selectivity. For example, while the two proteases were nearly identical in their rates of cleavage of the Tyr-Pro bond in the HIV-1 gag fragment, Val-Ser-Gln-Asn-Tyr-Pro-Ile-Val, the HIV-1 protease showed a 64-fold enhancement over the HIV-2 enzyme in hydrolysis of a Tyr-Val bond in the same template. Accordingly, the HIV-2 protease appears to have a different specificity than the HIV-1 enzyme; it is better able to hydrolyze substrates with small amino acids in P1 and P1', but is variable in its rate of hydrolysis of peptides with bulky substituents in these positions. In addition to these comparisons of the two proteases with respect to substrate specificity, we present inhibitor structure-activity data for the HIV-2 protease. Relative to P1-P1' statine or Phe psi [CH2N]Pro-modified pseudopeptidyl inhibitors, compounds having Xaa psi[CH(OH)CH2]Yaa inserts were found to show significantly higher affinities to both enzymes, generally binding from 10 to 100 times stronger to HIV-1 protease than to the HIV-2 enzyme. Molecular modeling comparisons based upon the sequence homology of the two enzymes and x-ray crystal structures of HIV-1 protease suggest that most of the nonconservative amino acid replacements occur in regions well outside the catalytic cleft, while only subtle structural differences exist within the active site.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
已对来自人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)1型和2型的病毒编码蛋白酶的高度纯化重组制剂进行了比较,比较内容包括:1)它们对非病毒蛋白和合成肽底物的特异性;2)它们被几种P1 - P1'假二肽基修饰的底物类似物抑制的情况。HIV - 2蛋白酶对假单胞菌外毒素衍生物Lys - PE40中Leu - Leu和Leu - Ala键的水解,在性质上与先前报道的HIV - 1酶相同(托马塞利,A.G.,许,J.O.,索耶,T.K.,斯台普斯,D.J.,菲茨杰拉德,D.J.,乔杜里,V.K.,帕斯坦,I.,和海因里克森,R.L.(1990)《生物化学杂志》265,408 - 413)。然而,HIV - 2蛋白酶在这两个位点的切割速率相反,它更喜欢Leu - Ala键。这两种酶对该蛋白底物的水解动力学与从模型肽切割获得的动力学情况相似。这两种蛋白酶对以HIV - 1和HIV - 2 gag多聚蛋白加工位点为模型的其他合成肽及其选定类似物的水解,显示出选择性上的差异和相似性。例如,虽然这两种蛋白酶对HIV - 1 gag片段Val - Ser - Gln - Asn - Tyr - Pro - Ile - Val中Tyr - Pro键的切割速率几乎相同,但HIV - 1蛋白酶在同一模板中对Tyr - Val键的水解比HIV - 2酶快64倍。因此,HIV - 2蛋白酶似乎具有与HIV - 1酶不同的特异性;它更能水解P1和P1'位带有小氨基酸的底物,但对这些位置带有庞大取代基的肽的水解速率则有所不同。除了对这两种蛋白酶底物特异性的这些比较外,我们还给出了HIV - 2蛋白酶的抑制剂构效关系数据。相对于P1 - P1' 他汀或Phe ψ[CH2N]Pro修饰的假肽基抑制剂,发现具有Xaa ψ[CH(OH)CH2]Yaa插入片段的化合物对这两种酶都显示出显著更高的亲和力,通常与HIV - 1蛋白酶的结合强度比与HIV - 2酶的结合强度高10到100倍。基于这两种酶的序列同源性以及HIV - 1蛋白酶的X射线晶体结构进行的分子模型比较表明,大多数非保守氨基酸替换发生在催化裂隙之外的区域,而活性位点内仅存在细微的结构差异。(摘要截短至400字)