• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

单外科医师行腹腔镜单部位手术与标准腹腔镜根治性肾切除术的配对比较。

A matched-pair comparison of laparoendoscopic single-site surgery and standard laparoscopic radical nephrectomy by a single urologist.

机构信息

Department of Urology, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China.

出版信息

J Endourol. 2012 Jun;26(6):676-81. doi: 10.1089/end.2011.0161. Epub 2011 Oct 21.

DOI:10.1089/end.2011.0161
PMID:22017261
Abstract

PURPOSE

The aim of this study is to compare the perioperative outcomes after transumbilical laparoendoscopic single-site (LESS) radical nephrectomy (LESS-RN) performed by a surgeon during his learning curve of this novel procedure with the outcomes after standard laparoscopic radical nephrectomy (LRN) for patients with a solitary renal tumor. Using this information, we examined whether LESS exhibits any objective advantages over standard laparoscopy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Twenty patients who underwent LESS-RN for a solitary cT(1)N(0)M(0) renal mass (group 1) were matched and compared with 33 patients who underwent standard LRN (group 2) for tumors of similar sizes. Patient and surgical data, pathologic outcomes, and follow-up information, including patient responses regarding cosmetic satisfaction, were analyzed.

RESULTS

The minimum duration of follow-up was 6 months for both groups. Patients in group 1 had significantly (P<0.05) quicker recoveries of bowel function, shorter postoperative analgesic time, and lower pain scores during their hospital stay. At the time of the last follow-up, all patients remained symptom free, and no evidence of recurrence was detected. Compared with that of standard LRN patients, LESS-RN patients exhibited better cosmetic satisfaction scores postoperatively at least to 6 months (P=0.013).

CONCLUSIONS

Transumbilical LESS-RN is a feasible, safe, and efficacious procedure with favorable perioperative outcomes that results in significantly improved control of postoperative pain, more rapid recovery of bowel function, and increased cosmetic satisfaction. Additional research, including randomized controlled trials and long-term follow-ups, however, will be needed to draw solid conclusions regarding the relative efficacy of this procedure compared with standard approaches.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较在该新术式学习曲线期间由外科医生进行的经脐腹腔镜单部位(LESS)根治性肾切除术(LESS-RN)与用于治疗单个肾肿瘤患者的标准腹腔镜根治性肾切除术(LRN)的围手术期结果。利用这些信息,我们检查了LESS 是否相对于标准腹腔镜具有任何客观优势。

患者与方法

20 例接受 LESS-RN 治疗的单个 cT(1)N(0)M(0)肾肿瘤患者(组 1)与 33 例接受标准 LRN 治疗的肿瘤大小相似的患者(组 2)进行匹配和比较。分析患者和手术数据、病理结果以及随访信息,包括患者对美容满意度的回复。

结果

两组患者的随访时间均至少为 6 个月。组 1 患者的肠道功能恢复、术后镇痛时间和住院期间疼痛评分明显(P<0.05)更快。在最后一次随访时,所有患者均无症状,未发现复发迹象。与标准 LRN 患者相比,LESS-RN 患者至少在术后 6 个月时表现出更好的美容满意度评分(P=0.013)。

结论

经脐LESS-RN 是一种可行、安全、有效的手术方法,具有良好的围手术期结果,可显著改善术后疼痛控制、更快恢复肠道功能和提高美容满意度。然而,需要进行更多的研究,包括随机对照试验和长期随访,才能得出关于该术式与标准方法相比的相对疗效的可靠结论。

相似文献

1
A matched-pair comparison of laparoendoscopic single-site surgery and standard laparoscopic radical nephrectomy by a single urologist.单外科医师行腹腔镜单部位手术与标准腹腔镜根治性肾切除术的配对比较。
J Endourol. 2012 Jun;26(6):676-81. doi: 10.1089/end.2011.0161. Epub 2011 Oct 21.
2
Retroperitoneal Laparoendoscopic Single-Incision Radical Nephrectomy Without Special Platforms: A Single-Center Initial Experience.无特殊平台的腹膜后腹腔镜单切口根治性肾切除术:单中心初步经验
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2016 Mar;26(3):203-8. doi: 10.1089/lap.2015.0483. Epub 2016 Feb 9.
3
[Laparoendoscopic single-site radical nephrectomy for kidney tumor. Surgical technique, cosmetic and postoperative pain control outcomes].[腹腔镜单孔入路根治性肾切除术治疗肾肿瘤。手术技术、美容效果及术后疼痛控制结果]
Urologia. 2013 Apr 24;80 Suppl 22:16-23. doi: 10.5301/ru.2013.11097.
4
Laparoendoscopic single-site versus conventional laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for renal cell cancer in patients with increased comorbidities and previous abdominal surgery: preliminary results of a single-centre retrospective study.腹腔镜单部位与传统腹腔镜根治性肾切除术治疗合并症增加和既往腹部手术的肾细胞癌患者:单中心回顾性研究的初步结果。
World J Urol. 2013 Feb;31(1):213-8. doi: 10.1007/s00345-012-1005-z. Epub 2012 Dec 16.
5
Laparoendoscopic single-site radical nephrectomy for renal cancer: technique and surgical outcomes.腹腔镜单部位根治性肾切除术治疗肾癌:技术与手术结果。
Eur Urol. 2012 Jul;62(1):168-74. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.10.002. Epub 2011 Oct 18.
6
Costs analysis of laparoendoscopic, single-site laparoscopic and open surgery for cT1 renal masses in a European high-volume centre.欧洲一家高容量中心针对cT1期肾肿块进行腹腔镜、单孔腹腔镜及开放手术的成本分析
World J Urol. 2014 Dec;32(6):1501-10. doi: 10.1007/s00345-013-1223-z. Epub 2013 Dec 18.
7
Comparison of laparoendoscopic single-site and multiport laparoscopic radical and partial nephrectomy: a prospective, nonrandomized study.腹腔镜单部位与多孔腹腔镜根治性和部分肾切除术的比较:一项前瞻性、非随机研究。
Urology. 2012 Nov;80(5):1039-45. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2012.07.018. Epub 2012 Sep 15.
8
Laparoendoscopic single-site and conventional laparoscopic radical nephrectomy result in equivalent surgical trauma: preliminary results of a single-centre retrospective controlled study.单孔腹腔镜与传统腹腔镜根治性肾切除术导致的手术创伤相当:单中心回顾性对照研究的初步结果。
Eur Urol. 2012 May;61(5):1048-53. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.01.043. Epub 2012 Feb 1.
9
Preliminary experience with transperitoneal laparoendoscopic single-site radical nephrectomy using a home-made single-port device in China.中国经腹腔腹腔镜单部位单孔装置根治性肾切除术的初步经验。
Chin Med J (Engl). 2014;127(2):279-83.
10
Is laparoendoscopic single-site surgery a viable approach for radical nephrectomy with renal vein thrombus? Comparison with multiport laparoscopy.腹腔镜单部位手术是否可作为伴有静脉瘤栓的根治性肾切除术的一种可行方法?与多孔腹腔镜的比较。
Urology. 2013 Jul;82(1):105-10. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2013.01.075. Epub 2013 May 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Initial experience of laparoendoscopic single-site radical prostatectomy with a novel purpose-built robotic system.使用新型专用机器人系统进行腹腔镜单孔根治性前列腺切除术的初步经验。
Asian J Urol. 2023 Oct;10(4):467-474. doi: 10.1016/j.ajur.2023.08.002. Epub 2023 Aug 18.
2
A comparison of perioperative outcomes between extraperitoneal robotic single-port and multiport radical prostatectomy with the da Vinci Si Surgical System.经腹腔入路机器人单孔与多孔前列腺根治术与达芬奇 Si 手术系统的围手术期结局比较。
Asian J Androl. 2021 Nov-Dec;23(6):640-647. doi: 10.4103/aja.aja_50_21.
3
Laparoendoscopic single-site nephrectomy versus conventional laparoendoscopic nephrectomy for kidney tumor: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
腹腔镜单孔肾切除术与传统腹腔镜肾切除术治疗肾肿瘤的系统评价和Meta分析
Biosci Rep. 2019 Aug 9;39(8). doi: 10.1042/BSR20190014. Print 2019 Aug 30.
4
Position of laparo-endoscopic single-site surgery nephrectomy in clinical practice and comparison (matched case-control study) with standard laparoscopic nephrectomy.腹腔镜单孔手术肾切除术在临床实践中的地位及与标准腹腔镜肾切除术的比较(配对病例对照研究)
Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2014 Sep;9(3):371-9. doi: 10.5114/wiitm.2014.43019. Epub 2014 May 26.
5
Prospective randomized controlled trial of conventional laparoscopic versus laparoendoscopic single-site radical nephrectomy for localized renal cell carcinoma: a preliminary report regarding quality of life.传统腹腔镜手术与经自然腔道内镜手术单孔根治性肾切除术治疗局限性肾细胞癌的前瞻性随机对照试验:关于生活质量的初步报告
World J Urol. 2015 Mar;33(3):367-72. doi: 10.1007/s00345-014-1322-5. Epub 2014 May 15.
6
Trends in surgical management of T1 renal cell carcinoma.T1 期肾细胞癌的手术治疗趋势。
Curr Urol Rep. 2014 Feb;15(2):383. doi: 10.1007/s11934-013-0383-0.
7
Have we learned from lessons of the past? A systematic review of training for single incision laparoscopic surgery.我们从过去的经验中吸取教训了吗?单孔腹腔镜手术培训的系统评价。
Surg Endosc. 2013 May;27(5):1478-84. doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2632-6. Epub 2012 Oct 17.