• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

从新诊断的青少年及其父母的角度出发进行乳糜泻的大规模筛查:一项混合方法研究。

Mass screening for celiac disease from the perspective of newly diagnosed adolescents and their parents: a mixed-method study.

机构信息

Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Epidemiology and Global Health, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.

出版信息

BMC Public Health. 2011 Oct 21;11:822. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-822.

DOI:10.1186/1471-2458-11-822
PMID:22017750
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3229548/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Mass screening for celiac disease (CD) as a public health intervention is controversial. Prior to implementation, acceptability to the targeted population should be addressed. We aimed at exploring adolescents' and parents' experiences of having the adolescents' CD detected through mass screening, and their attitudes towards possible future mass screening.

METHODS

All adolescents (n = 145) with screening-detected CD found in a Swedish school-based screening study, and their parents, were invited to this study about one year after diagnosis. In all, 14 focus group discussions were conducted with 31 adolescents and 43 parents. Written narrative was completed by 91 adolescents (63%) and 105 parents (72%), and questionnaires returned by 114 parents (79%). Data were analyzed using qualitative content analysis. In addition, narratives and questionnaire data allowed for quantified measures.

RESULTS

Adolescents and parents described how they agreed to participate "for the good of others," without considering consequences for themselves. However, since the screening also introduced a potential risk of having the disease, the invitation was regarded as "an offer hard to resist." For the majority, receiving the diagnosis was described as "a bolt of lightning," but for some it provided an explanation for previous health problems, and "suddenly everything made sense." Looking back at the screening, the predominant attitude was "feeling grateful for being made aware," but some adolescents and parents also expressed "ambivalent feelings about personal benefits." Among parents, 92% supported future CD screening. The most common opinion among both adolescents and parents was that future CD mass screening should be "a right for everyone" and should be offered as early as possible. However, some argued that it should be "only for sufferers" with symptoms, whereas others were "questioning the benefits" of CD mass screening.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the incentives to participate in the CD screening were partly non-personal, and diagnosis was met with surprise, adolescents and parents felt grateful that they were made aware. They welcomed future CD screening, but suggested that it should be conducted earlier in life. Thus, CD mass screening seemed acceptable to most of those who were diagnosed and their parents.

摘要

背景

作为公共卫生干预措施,对乳糜泻(CD)进行大规模筛查存在争议。在实施之前,应解决目标人群的可接受性问题。我们旨在探讨青少年在大规模筛查中发现 CD 的经历,以及他们对未来可能进行的大规模筛查的态度。

方法

在一项瑞典基于学校的筛查研究中,所有筛查发现的 CD 青少年(n=145)及其父母均被邀请参加本研究。共进行了 31 名青少年和 43 名父母的 14 个焦点小组讨论。91 名青少年(63%)和 105 名父母(72%)完成了书面叙述,114 名父母(79%)返回了问卷。使用定性内容分析对数据进行分析。此外,叙述和问卷数据允许进行量化测量。

结果

青少年和父母描述了他们如何同意“为了他人的利益”参与筛查,而不考虑对自己的后果。然而,由于筛查也引入了患病的潜在风险,因此邀请被视为“难以抗拒的提议”。对大多数人来说,接受诊断被描述为“晴天霹雳”,但对一些人来说,这为之前的健康问题提供了解释,“突然间一切都有了意义”。回顾筛查,主要态度是“庆幸被发现”,但有些青少年和父母也表达了对个人获益的“矛盾情绪”。在父母中,92%的人支持未来的 CD 筛查。青少年和父母最常见的观点是,未来的 CD 大规模筛查应该“人人享有权利”,并应尽早提供。然而,一些人认为它应该只针对有症状的“患者”,而另一些人则对 CD 大规模筛查的“好处”表示质疑。

结论

尽管参与 CD 筛查的动机部分是非个人的,且诊断令人惊讶,但青少年和父母都感到庆幸自己被发现了。他们欢迎未来的 CD 筛查,但建议应在生命早期进行。因此,大多数被诊断的青少年及其父母都对 CD 大规模筛查表示认可。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1bde/3229548/e6fcf54b46a0/1471-2458-11-822-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1bde/3229548/7f1617840e64/1471-2458-11-822-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1bde/3229548/e6fcf54b46a0/1471-2458-11-822-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1bde/3229548/7f1617840e64/1471-2458-11-822-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1bde/3229548/e6fcf54b46a0/1471-2458-11-822-2.jpg

相似文献

1
Mass screening for celiac disease from the perspective of newly diagnosed adolescents and their parents: a mixed-method study.从新诊断的青少年及其父母的角度出发进行乳糜泻的大规模筛查:一项混合方法研究。
BMC Public Health. 2011 Oct 21;11:822. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-822.
2
Balancing health benefits and social sacrifices: a qualitative study of how screening-detected celiac disease impacts adolescents' quality of life.权衡健康获益与社会牺牲:一项定性研究,探讨筛查发现的乳糜泻如何影响青少年的生活质量。
BMC Pediatr. 2011 May 10;11:32. doi: 10.1186/1471-2431-11-32.
3
Internalizing the threat of risk--a qualitative study about adolescents' experience living with screening-detected celiac disease 5 years after diagnosis.内化风险威胁——一项关于青少年在诊断后 5 年内经历筛查发现的乳糜泻的定性研究。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2014 Jun 11;12:91. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-12-91.
4
Health-related quality of life in adolescents with screening-detected celiac disease, before and one year after diagnosis and initiation of gluten-free diet, a prospective nested case-referent study.前瞻性巢式病例对照研究:在诊断和开始无麸质饮食之前和一年后,筛查发现的乳糜泻青少年的健康相关生活质量。
BMC Public Health. 2013 Feb 16;13:142. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-142.
5
An intervention to improve the quality of life in children of parents with serious mental illness: the Young SMILES feasibility RCT.改善严重精神疾病父母子女生活质量的干预措施:Young SMILES 可行性 RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2020 Nov;24(59):1-136. doi: 10.3310/hta24590.
6
Parents' willingness to pay for coeliac disease screening of their child.家长愿意为孩子进行乳糜泻筛查。
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2011 Apr;52(4):452-9. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0b013e3182037efd.
7
Health-related quality-of-life in children with coeliac disease, measured prior to receiving their diagnosis through screening.接受筛查前诊断为乳糜泻的儿童的健康相关生活质量。
J Med Screen. 2011;18(4):187-92. doi: 10.1258/jms.2011.011081. Epub 2011 Nov 21.
8
Usefulness of symptoms to screen for celiac disease.症状在筛查乳糜泻中的作用。
Pediatrics. 2014 Feb;133(2):211-8. doi: 10.1542/peds.2012-3765. Epub 2014 Jan 13.
9
Parents' and teachers' views on sexual health education and screening for sexually transmitted infections among in-school adolescent girls in Kenya: a qualitative study.肯尼亚在校少女性健康教育培训和性传播感染筛查:家长和教师的观点——一项定性研究。
Reprod Health. 2017 Aug 14;14(1):95. doi: 10.1186/s12978-017-0360-z.
10
A Qualitative Analysis of Adolescent and Caregiver Acceptability of Universally Offered Gonorrhea and Chlamydia Screening in the Pediatric Emergency Department.儿科急诊科普遍提供淋病和衣原体筛查的青少年及照顾者可接受性的定性分析
Ann Emerg Med. 2017 Dec;70(6):787-796.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2017.04.017. Epub 2017 May 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Celiac disease screening in children: evaluating the evidence, benefits, and challenges.儿童乳糜泻筛查:评估证据、益处及挑战
Front Pediatr. 2025 Apr 3;13:1562073. doi: 10.3389/fped.2025.1562073. eCollection 2025.
2
Knowledge and opinions of asymptomatic adolescents and their caregivers on celiac disease screening.无症状青少年及其照顾者对乳糜泻筛查的认知与看法。
Paediatr Child Health. 2020 Apr 2;26(3):e145-e151. doi: 10.1093/pch/pxaa006. eCollection 2021 Jun.
3
Internalizing the threat of risk--a qualitative study about adolescents' experience living with screening-detected celiac disease 5 years after diagnosis.

本文引用的文献

1
Balancing health benefits and social sacrifices: a qualitative study of how screening-detected celiac disease impacts adolescents' quality of life.权衡健康获益与社会牺牲:一项定性研究,探讨筛查发现的乳糜泻如何影响青少年的生活质量。
BMC Pediatr. 2011 May 10;11:32. doi: 10.1186/1471-2431-11-32.
2
The PreventCD Study design: towards new strategies for the prevention of coeliac disease.《预防 CD 研究设计:探索乳糜泻预防的新策略》。
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010 Dec;22(12):1424-30. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0b013e32833fe9ae.
3
Parents' experiences of having an asymptomatic child diagnosed with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy through family screening.
内化风险威胁——一项关于青少年在诊断后 5 年内经历筛查发现的乳糜泻的定性研究。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2014 Jun 11;12:91. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-12-91.
父母通过家族筛查让无症状孩子被诊断为肥厚型心肌病的经历。
Cardiol Young. 2011 Feb;21(1):8-14. doi: 10.1017/S1047951110001290. Epub 2010 Oct 1.
4
How do children experience participating in a coeliac disease screening? A qualitative study based on children's written narratives.儿童参与乳糜泻筛查的体验如何?基于儿童书面叙述的定性研究。
Scand J Public Health. 2010 Jun;38(4):351-8. doi: 10.1177/1403494810368454. Epub 2010 Apr 22.
5
Dietary compliance and life style of children with coeliac disease.儿童乳糜泻的饮食依从性和生活方式。
J Hum Nutr Diet. 2010 Apr;23(2):176-82. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-277X.2009.01036.x. Epub 2010 Feb 12.
6
Should we screen for coeliac disease? No.我们应该筛查乳糜泻吗?不应该。
BMJ. 2009 Sep 17;339:b3674. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b3674.
7
Should we screen for coeliac disease? Yes.我们应该筛查乳糜泻吗?应该。
BMJ. 2009 Sep 17;339:b3592. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b3592.
8
Celiac disease revealed in 3% of Swedish 12-year-olds born during an epidemic.在疫情期间出生的瑞典12岁儿童中,3%被查出患有乳糜泻。
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2009 Aug;49(2):170-6. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0b013e31818c52cc.
9
Coeliac disease.乳糜泻
Lancet. 2009 Apr 25;373(9673):1480-93. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60254-3.
10
Long-term health and quality-of-life consequences of mass screening for childhood celiac disease: a 10-year follow-up study.儿童乳糜泻大规模筛查的长期健康及生活质量影响:一项10年随访研究
Pediatrics. 2009 Apr;123(4):e582-8. doi: 10.1542/peds.2008-2221.